How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spectral gap for a unitary representation
Definition
Let be a topological group and let be a strongly continuous unitary representation (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners) on a Hilbert space (Hilbert space). Put This is a closed invariant subspace: if and , then for every the isometry gives . Its orthogonal complement (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement) is also closed and -invariant by Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations, so the restriction is a strongly continuous unitary representation. The representation has spectral gap if where is the trivial representation and is weak containment (Weak containment of unitary representations).
If is locally compact Hausdorff (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice), this is equivalent by Weak containment of the trivial representation and almost invariant vectors to the existence of a compact containing the identity and an such that No displacement equivalence is asserted for general topological groups.
Remarks
The weak-containment lemma says, under its LCH and AC hypotheses, that exactly when every compact and every admit a unit vector in with displacement . Negating this statement gives one compact and one for which every unit vector has displacement at least . Rescaling gives the displayed bound for every nonzero vector, and for both sides are zero. Replacing by preserves the bound and ensures the compact set is nonempty. If , the weak-containment condition fails and the displacement inequality holds vacuously apart from its true zero-vector equality.
Depends on
- Weak containment of unitary representations
- Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners
- Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement
- Hilbert space
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations
- Weak containment of the trivial representation and almost invariant vectors
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.