Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spectral gap for a unitary representation

Definition

Let G be a topological group and let (π,H) be a strongly continuous unitary representation (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners) on a Hilbert space H (Hilbert space). Put HG:={ξ∈H:π(g)ξ=ξ for every g∈G}. This is a closed invariant subspace: if ξn∈HG and ξn→ξ, then for every g the isometry π(g) gives ∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥≤2∥ξ−ξn∥→0. Its orthogonal complement HG⊥ (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement) is also closed and G-invariant by Invariant orthogonal complements in unitary representations, so the restriction π∣HG⊥ is a strongly continuous unitary representation. The representation π has spectral gap if 1G⊀π∣HG⊥, where 1G is the trivial representation and ≺ is weak containment (Weak containment of unitary representations).

If G is locally compact Hausdorff (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice), this is equivalent by Weak containment of the trivial representation and almost invariant vectors to the existence of a compact Q⊆G containing the identity and an ε>0 such that sup⁡g∈Q∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥≥ε∥ξ∥for every ξ∈HG⊥. No displacement equivalence is asserted for general topological groups.

Remarks

The weak-containment lemma says, under its LCH and AC hypotheses, that 1G≺π∣HG⊥ exactly when every compact Q and every δ>0 admit a unit vector in HG⊥ with displacement <δ. Negating this statement gives one compact Q and one ε>0 for which every unit vector has displacement at least ε. Rescaling gives the displayed bound for every nonzero vector, and for ξ=0 both sides are zero. Replacing Q by Q∪{e} preserves the bound and ensures the compact set is nonempty. If HG⊥={0}, the weak-containment condition fails and the displacement inequality holds vacuously apart from its true zero-vector equality.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources