How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Standard and costandard objects
Definition
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and .
For , define the standard and costandard weight modules by
The Verma module is defined in Verma modules, and its restricted dual is defined in Restricted Chevalley dual. Under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), Restricted duality is exact and involutive on O places in , so both displayed modules are objects of that category. These symbols impose no projectivity or highest-weight-category axiom.
Depends on
Used by
- Injectives have costandard filtrations Corollary
- Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities Definition
- Standard- and costandard-filtered objects and tilting objects Definition
- The integral parabolic category-O blocks for higher-level Schur-Weyl duality Definition
- The regular integral block and its antidominant weight Definition
- The singular integral block and its dot stabilizer Definition
- The regular integral sl2 block Example
- Standard-costandard Hom and Ext-one orthogonality Lemma
- The simple socle of a costandard object Proposition
- BGG reciprocity Theorem
- Duflo–Joseph g-finite endomorphisms of every Verma module Theorem
- Parabolic category O is a highest weight category Theorem
- Simple Verma composition multiplicities are Kazhdan–Lusztig values Theorem
- Singular category O multiplicities are parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig values Theorem
- Translation to the wall on Verma, simple and projective objects Theorem
- Type-A parabolic category-O Ringel duality via the opposite parabolic Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lecture 8 §3 Definition 3.12, p.5 (standard reference, not scraped)