Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unreduced homology theory on cw pairs

Definition

A CW pair is (X,A) with A a CW subcomplex of X, as in Skeleta, CW subcomplexes, and relative CW complexes. Morphisms are all continuous maps of pairs, not just cellular maps. An ordinary unreduced homology theory assigns covariant functors hn from CW pairs to abelian groups, for every nZ, and natural homomorphisms :hn(X,A)hn1(A), where hn(X)=hn(X,), satisfying:

  • Homotopic maps of pairs induce equal homomorphisms.
  • The inclusion maps and form an exact sequence hn(A)hn(X)hn(X,A)hn1(A).
  • For CW subcomplexes U,V of X=UV, inclusion induces hn(U,UV)hn(X,V).
  • For a point , hn()=0 when n0; write G=h0().
  • For every set-indexed family of CW pairs, including the empty family, the inclusions induce αhn(Xα,Aα)hn(αXα,αAα).

Thus hn()=0. No finite-dimensionality or finite-cell restriction is implicit.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources