How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Matrix 2-vector spaces exhibit horizontal and vertical composition
Example
In the ungraded component of , identify with pairs of vector spaces. A linear functor is a matrix of finite-dimensional vector spaces, and composition is matrix multiplication using direct sums and tensor products.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The matrix presentation of finite semisimple categories and the composition convention in G-graded finite semisimple 2-vector space.
Weak linear 2-category: Horizontal composition is a functor, so its functoriality gives the interchange equation between horizontal and vertical composition.
Verification
Let have matrix and let have matrix . With rows indexed by outputs and columns by inputs, , so Each summand is the contribution of one intermediate simple label.
Let scale by , let scale the same entry by , let scale by , and let scale the same entry by ; all other entries and components are identities. On the second intermediate-label summand of the entry of , horizontal composition first gives scalar , and the next horizontal 2-cell gives , so vertical composition gives . Vertically composing first gives scalar in and in , whose horizontal tensor is . The first intermediate-label summand is unchanged in both paths. Thus the two interchange composites agree entrywise, and hence agree as natural transformations.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Douglas and Reutter, Fusion 2-Categories and a State-Sum Invariant for 4-Manifolds, §1.4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Décoppet and Yu, Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara-Yamagami Fusion 2-Categories, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)