Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite triangulation angle bookkeeping

Example

For the tetrahedral combinatorial pattern V=4, E=6, F=4, the incidence identity 3F=2E holds and the Euler expression is 2π(V−E+F)=4π. If this pattern is equipped with face-corner angles from a smooth closed surface triangulation, the angles around each vertex sum to 2π; then the total exterior-angle correction is 3πF−2πV=4π, leaving 2πF−4π=4π in the local-to-global count. The incidence pattern alone supplies no angle measurements or curvature integral.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite combinatorial data of a closed triangulation with four vertices, six edges and four triangular faces, each vertex incident with three face corners, each edge incident with two faces, and each face bounded by three distinct edges.

[F1]

For a curvilinear triangulation of a compact surface, the number mv of face corners at a vertex satisfies ∑vmv=3F, the face-edge incidences satisfy 3F=2Eint+Ebd, and boundary incidences satisfy Ebd=Vbd; in the closed case these reduce to ∑vmv=3F=2E (Curvilinear face-to-face triangulation).

[F2]

Under full AC, the supplied local-to-global lemma applies to a closed oriented Riemannian surface with a finite face-to-face geodesic triangulation whose faces are compact regular oriented disks in frameable charts, and gives ∫MK dA=2π(V−E+F); the incident face angles sum to 2π at each interior vertex (Summing local Gauss-Bonnet over a supplied triangulation).

[F3]

For a curvilinear triangulation of a compact surface the Euler characteristic of the triangulated surface is χ(M;T)=V−E+F (Euler characteristic of a finitely triangulated compact surface).

Verification

technique · enumerate the incidences of the tetrahedral pattern, count the vertex angles and substitute into the finite local-to-global identity
1.1F1F3given

In the given pattern V=4, E=6 and F=4; every edge is interior and incident with two faces, so counting face-edge incidences gives 3F=12=2E, and counting face corners gives ∑vmv=3F=12, compatible with three corners at each of the four vertices. Hence V−E+F=4−6+4=2.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

For the conditional angle count, suppose face-corner angles βc are supplied and satisfy the smooth closed-surface normalization ∑c∋vβc=2π at each of the four vertices. This is additional geometric data, not a consequence of the incidence pattern. With exterior angles αc=π−βc, there are 3F face corners by [F1], so ∑f∑cαc=3πF−∑v2π=12π−8π=4π.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Under the angle normalization in step 2.1, the formal remainder is 2πF−∑f∑cαc=8π−4π=4π. Since 3F=2E and V=4, this is 2π(V−E+F). If AC and a smooth oriented Riemannian realization with a supplied finite geodesic triangulation satisfying [F2]'s hypotheses were separately supplied, [F2] would identify this count with its curvature integral. The combinatorial pattern alone supplies neither the angle normalization nor a Riemannian surface, so it asserts no curvature integral.

Source locator

Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Chapter 9, printed pp. 167-172, reduces the global theorem to the vertex-edge-face count for a finite triangulation; Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Lecture 2, Section 2.2, printed pp. 13-15, uses the same incidence identities. The tetrahedral enumeration is carried out here purely as finite arithmetic against the conventions of Curvilinear face-to-face triangulation and the count of Summing local Gauss-Bonnet over a supplied triangulation, with no geometric realization claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources