Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Simpson indicator misses a feature between its sample nodes

Example

On [0,1], let f(x)=∏r=04(x−r/4)2. The root indicator is zero, so for every τ>0 the call to Finite-depth adaptive Simpson with an indicator with D=0 and P=1 accepts its root panel and returns estimate 0. Choose τ=C/32; for this tolerance the true error is strictly greater than τ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The polynomial f above, the exact-real Simpson algorithm, and the adaptive call with D=0, P=1, and τ=C/32, where C=(181165169161316)2>0.

[F1]

Finite-depth adaptive Simpson with an indicator: the root call returns the refined Simpson value with accepted status when its indicator does not exceed τ.

[F2]

Embedded Simpson refinement indicator: the root indicator is ∣S1−S0∣/15 using the parent and its two child Simpson values.

[F4]

Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable: a continuous real function on [0,1] is Riemann integrable.

[F6]

Composite Simpson rule on an even uniform grid: for an even grid, the Simpson value is the stated weighted sum of its endpoint, midpoint and quarter-grid values.

[F7]

For a<c<b: f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c] and on [c,b], and then ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,c: for bounded integrable f and a<c<b, ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf; applying this twice splits the integral over the three adjacent intervals used below.

Verification

1.1givenF2F6algebra

Every parent and child sample node is in {0,1/4,1/2,3/4,1}. Each node makes one factor of f zero, so [F6] gives S0=S1=0 and [F2] gives indicator 0.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Since 0≤τ, [F1] accepts immediately, before the depth cap is relevant, and returns S1=0.

3.1givenF3F4F5F7F8step 2.1algebra∎

On [1/8,3/16], the five absolute factors are at least 1/8,1/16,5/16,9/16,13/16, respectively, so f≥C there. Since f is a product of squares, f≥0 on all of [0,1]; each factor has absolute value at most 1 there, so f≤1 and is bounded. By [F3]–[F4], its restrictions to the three adjacent intervals determined by 1/8 and 3/16 are integrable. Monotonicity [F5] and the constant integral [F8] give ∫1/83/16f≥C/16; monotonicity [F5] gives nonnegative integrals on the two outer intervals. Applying the two-piece identity [F7] twice therefore yields ∫01f≥C/16=2τ. Step 2.1 gives returned estimate 0, so the returned error satisfies ∣∫01f−0∣≥2τ>τ, despite the accepted status.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources