How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Infinite dihedral type: the chamber system is a line, not a sphere; the contractible model is deferred
Example
Let with (infinite dihedral type), so that and is positive semidefinite with radical (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clause (3)(i)); write a functional as and put . Let , the chambers and the Tits cone be as in The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes and The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional. Then:
(i) The generators act by and , and is -invariant. The fundamental chamber is the closed positive quadrant , and the chambers are the cones over the unit intervals of the affine line ; their relative interiors are pairwise disjoint.
(ii) , so ; the nonzero points of the line lie outside , and .
(iii) There is no with : indeed every nonzero has , hence is disjoint from , while every chamber lies in . Consequently is infinite and the length function is unbounded on , so has no longest element; the spherical conclusion of The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere fails at its finiteness hypothesis.
(iv) The rays of are the nonzero points of the chart : the map is a bijection from onto , and the images of the chambers are the unit intervals . The chamber subdivision is therefore infinite and has no finite subcomplex covering it; in particular the complex is not a finite sphere. The construction of a contractible -complex for infinite (the Davis complex) and its comparison with this chamber system belong to the later page spherical-parabolic-cosets-and-the-davis-complex (order 1768); no result of that page is used or asserted here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Coxeter system with and , the form on , the dual action on with chamber , chambers and Tits cone , and a functional written as with .
is symmetric bilinear with and , and on is positive semidefinite with radical ; the reflection formula is for , so , , , ; the product has matrix with and , so for every (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clauses (1)-(3)); and is the canonical reflection homomorphism with root system (The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone).
The dual action is , and in the coordinates its generators act by and ; the closed chamber is and the chambers of the chamber system are the sets (The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes, The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling, clause (3), The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional).
The open chambers are pairwise disjoint (Chamber collisions, point stabilizers, and the intersection rule, clause (6)).
if and only if is finite (The interior of the Tits cone, finite parabolic stabilizers, and local finiteness, clause (5)).
Verification
In the coordinates the generators act by the displayed formulas [F2], and both fix : and . Since generates and the dual action is a left action, for every .
The element satisfies and by [F1] its matrix on is with and ; hence for every (for negative use , which holds because ). Therefore in for every , and is infinite.
For with write , so ; then [F2] gives , that is, acts on the line by , and , that is, ; since the action is a left action, acts by and by , so the images of under include every interval and , that is, every unit interval with . Conversely sends a unit interval to and to , both unit intervals, so by induction on length every sends to a unit interval. Since the act linearly and is the cone over , each is the cone over . Hence the chambers are exactly the cones over the unit intervals .
By step 1.2 the group is infinite, so [F4] gives .
By [F1], on gives , and these are pairwise distinct roots for because their -coefficients are distinct; hence is infinite. If were bounded by some natural number , then every element of would be the value of one of the finitely many words in of length at most (using ), so would be finite, contradicting step 1.2. Thus is unbounded on and has no longest element.
Every chamber is the cone over a unit interval of by step 2.1, and every point of such a cone is with and , so is nonnegative on and positive on . Conversely, if then is a real number, hence lies in some unit interval , and then lies in the cone over , which is a chamber; and . Therefore , so the nonzero points of lie outside and .
The relative interior of the chamber which is the cone over is the open cone over , which is the open chamber for the corresponding ; by [F3] these are pairwise disjoint.
If for some , then because every chamber is contained in by step 2.1; but contains for , and since for ( is the open quadrant and ). This contradiction shows that no chamber equals .
The map is well defined on by step 3.1, has values in , is invariant under positive scaling and separates distinct positive rays: if then with positive factor, and conversely positive multiples have the same image; it is surjective onto because gives with by step 3.1. By step 2.1 it carries the chambers onto the unit intervals . The subdivision is infinite because the intervals are pairwise distinct, and no finite union of chambers covers : a finite union of cones over contains no point with and -coordinate , while such points of exist. Hence this chamber system is not a finite sphere; the contractible comparison complex (the Davis complex) belongs to the later page named in the statement and is not used here.
Remarks
-
Consistency with the finite-negativity criterion. For a nonzero with , one has and . By the matrix in [F1], the roots and are positive for every integer , and each family is pairwise distinct. Their values are and . Thus the first family supplies infinitely many negative values when , and the second does so when . Hence has infinitely many negative positive roots, in agreement with The finite-negativity criterion, the reduction step, and convexity of the Tits cone (1), which gives .
-
The negative comparison is the whole of it. This item proves that the finiteness hypothesis in the spherical tiling and triangulation cannot be dropped, and it stops there: it asserts nothing about a contractible complex on which acts, and it declares no dependency on the later page that supplies one.
Depends on
- The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone
- The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional
- Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups
- The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling
- Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order
- Chamber collisions, point stabilizers, and the intersection rule
- The finite-negativity criterion, the reduction step, and convexity of the Tits cone
- The interior of the Tits cone, finite parabolic stabilizers, and local finiteness
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (Princeton University Press 2008, first-edition author manuscript PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean Michel, Lectures on Coxeter groups (Beijing lecture notes, April-May 2014, author-hosted PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)