Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Infinite dihedral type: the chamber system is a line, not a sphere; the contractible model is deferred

Example

Let S={s,t} with m(s,t)=∞ (infinite dihedral type), so that B(es,et)=−1 and B is positive semidefinite with radical R(es+et) (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clause (3)(i)); write a functional f∈V∗ as (ys,yt)=(f(es),f(et)) and put Δ(f):=f(es+et)=ys+yt. Let C, the chambers wC and the Tits cone U=⋃w∈WwC be as in The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes and The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional. Then:

(i) The generators act by s:(ys,yt)↦(−ys, 2ys+yt) and t:(ys,yt)↦(ys+2yt, −yt), and Δ is W-invariant. The fundamental chamber is the closed positive quadrant C={ys≥0, yt≥0}, and the chambers wC (w∈W) are the cones over the unit intervals [k,k+1] (k∈Z) of the affine line {Δ=1}; their relative interiors are pairwise disjoint.

(ii) U={f:Δ(f)>0}∪{0}, so U≠V∗; the nonzero points of the line {Δ=0} lie outside U, and 0∉U∘.

(iii) There is no w∈W with wC=−C: indeed every nonzero f∈−C has Δ(f)<0, hence −C∖{0} is disjoint from U, while every chamber lies in U. Consequently Φ is infinite and the length function ℓ is unbounded on W, so W has no longest element; the spherical conclusion of The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere fails at its finiteness hypothesis.

(iv) The rays of U are the nonzero points of the chart {Δ=1}: the map f↦f/Δ(f) is a bijection from (U∖{0})/R>0 onto {Δ=1}≅R, and the images of the chambers are the unit intervals [k,k+1]. The chamber subdivision is therefore infinite and has no finite subcomplex covering it; in particular the complex is not a finite sphere. The construction of a contractible W-complex for infinite W (the Davis complex) and its comparison with this chamber system belong to the later page spherical-parabolic-cosets-and-the-davis-complex (order 1768); no result of that page is used or asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Coxeter system with S={s,t} and m(s,t)=∞, the form B on V=RS, the dual action on V∗ with chamber C, chambers wC and Tits cone U, and a functional written as (ys,yt) with Δ=ys+yt.

[F1]

B is symmetric bilinear with B(es,es)=B(et,et)=1 and B(es,et)=−1, and B∣P on P=Res+Ret is positive semidefinite with radical R(es+et); the reflection formula is ra(v)=v−2B(v,a)a for B(a,a)=1, so rs(es)=−es, rs(et)=et+2es, rt(et)=−et, rt(es)=es+2et; the product A:=ρ(st)=rsrt has matrix (3−22−1)=I+N with N=(2−22−2)≠0 and N2=0, so Ak=I+kN for every k∈Z (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clauses (1)-(3)); and ρ is the canonical reflection homomorphism with root system Φ={ρ(w)es:w∈W, s∈S} (The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone).

[F2]

The dual action is (w⋅f)(v)=f(ρ(w)−1v), and in the coordinates (ys,yt) its generators act by s:(ys,yt)↦(−ys, 2ys+yt) and t:(ys,yt)↦(ys+2yt, −yt); the closed chamber is C={f:f(es)≥0, f(et)≥0} and the chambers of the chamber system are the sets wC (The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes, The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling, clause (3), The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional).

[F3]

The open chambers wC∘ (w∈W) are pairwise disjoint (Chamber collisions, point stabilizers, and the intersection rule, clause (6)).

[F4]

0∈U∘ if and only if W is finite (The interior of the Tits cone, finite parabolic stabilizers, and local finiteness, clause (5)).

Verification

technique · explicit coordinate computation with the dual action
1.1F2algebragiven

In the coordinates (ys,yt) the generators act by the displayed formulas [F2], and both fix Δ: (−ys)+(2ys+yt)=ys+yt and (ys+2yt)+(−yt)=ys+yt. Since S generates W and the dual action is a left action, Δ(w⋅f)=Δ(f) for every w∈W.

1.2F1algebragiven

The element st satisfies ρ(st)=rsrt and by [F1] its matrix on P is A=I+N with N≠0 and N2=0; hence ρ((st)k)=Ak=I+kN≠I for every k≠0 (for negative k use (I+N)−1=I−N, which holds because N2=0). Therefore (st)k≠1 in W for every k≠0, and W is infinite.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

For f with Δ(f)=1 write a:=ys, so yt=1−a; then [F2] gives s⋅f=(−a, 2a+1−a)=(−a, 1+a), that is, s acts on the line {Δ=1} by a↦−a, and t⋅f=(a+2(1−a), −(1−a))=(2−a, a−1), that is, a↦2−a; since the action is a left action, (st)k acts by a↦a−2k and s(st)k by a↦−a+2k, so the images of C∩{Δ=1}={0≤a≤1}=[0,1] under W include every interval [2k,2k+1] and [2k−1,2k], that is, every unit interval [k,k+1] with k∈Z. Conversely s sends a unit interval [k,k+1] to [−k−1,−k] and t to [1−k,2−k], both unit intervals, so by induction on length every w sends [0,1] to a unit interval. Since the w act linearly and C={ys≥0, yt≥0} is the cone over [0,1], each wC is the cone over w⋅[0,1]. Hence the chambers are exactly the cones over the unit intervals [k,k+1].

2.2F4step 1.2given

By step 1.2 the group W is infinite, so [F4] gives 0∉U∘.

2.3F1step 1.2algebra

By [F1], ρ((st)k)=I+kN on P gives ρ((st)k)es=es+k(2es+2et)=(1+2k)es+2ket, and these are pairwise distinct roots for k∈Z because their es-coefficients 1+2k are distinct; hence Φ is infinite. If ℓ were bounded by some natural number N, then every element of W would be the value of one of the finitely many words in S of length at most N (using s−1=s), so W would be finite, contradicting step 1.2. Thus ℓ is unbounded on W and W has no longest element.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Every chamber is the cone over a unit interval of {Δ=1} by step 2.1, and every point of such a cone is λg with λ≥0 and Δ(g)=1, so Δ is nonnegative on U and positive on U∖{0}. Conversely, if Δ(f)>0 then a:=ys/Δ(f) is a real number, hence lies in some unit interval [k,k+1], and then f=Δ(f)(a,1−a) lies in the cone over [k,k+1], which is a chamber; and 0∈C⊆U. Therefore U={f:Δ(f)>0}∪{0}, so the nonzero points of {Δ=0} lie outside U and U≠V∗.

3.2F3step 2.1algebra

The relative interior of the chamber which is the cone over [k,k+1] is the open cone over (k,k+1), which is the open chamber wC∘ for the corresponding w; by [F3] these are pairwise disjoint.

3.3step 2.1algebra

If wC=−C for some w, then −C⊆{Δ≥0} because every chamber is contained in {Δ≥0} by step 2.1; but −C contains −(v) for v∈C∘, and Δ(−v)=−Δ(v)<0 since Δ(v)>0 for v∈C∘ (C∘ is the open quadrant and v≠0). This contradiction shows that no chamber equals −C.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

The map f↦f/Δ(f) is well defined on U∖{0} by step 3.1, has values in {Δ=1}, is invariant under positive scaling and separates distinct positive rays: if f/Δ(f)=g/Δ(g) then f=(Δ(f)/Δ(g))g with positive factor, and conversely positive multiples have the same image; it is surjective onto {Δ=1} because Δ(g)=1 gives g=g/Δ(g) with g∈U by step 3.1. By step 2.1 it carries the chambers onto the unit intervals [k,k+1]. The subdivision is infinite because the intervals are pairwise distinct, and no finite union of chambers covers U: a finite union of cones over [k1,k1+1],…,[kn,kn+1] contains no point f with Δ(f)=1 and ys-coordinate a>max⁡iki+1, while such points of {Δ=1}⊆U exist. Hence this chamber system is not a finite sphere; the contractible comparison complex (the Davis complex) belongs to the later page named in the statement and is not used here.

Remarks

  • Consistency with the finite-negativity criterion. For a nonzero f with Δ(f)=0, one has yt=−ys and ys≠0. By the matrix in [F1], the roots αk:=ρ((st)k)es=(1+2k)es+2ket and βk:=ρ((st)−k)et=2kes+(1+2k)et are positive for every integer k≥0, and each family is pairwise distinct. Their values are f(αk)=ys and f(βk)=−ys. Thus the first family supplies infinitely many negative values when ys<0, and the second does so when ys>0. Hence f has infinitely many negative positive roots, in agreement with The finite-negativity criterion, the reduction step, and convexity of the Tits cone (1), which gives f∉U.

  • The negative comparison is the whole of it. This item proves that the finiteness hypothesis in the spherical tiling and triangulation cannot be dropped, and it stops there: it asserts nothing about a contractible complex on which W acts, and it declares no dependency on the later page that supplies one.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources