Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Coxeter complex of A3: a triangulation of the sphere and the residue of a proper parabolic

Example

Let S={s1,s2,s3} with m(si,si)=1, m(si,sj)=3 when ∣i−j∣=1 and m(si,sj)=2 when ∣i−j∣=2 (type A3; thus W≅S4 and ∣W∣=24), and let A, C, the faces CI‾, the sphere S2, the coset face poset and the complex Σ be as in The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset and The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere. Then:

(i) B is positive definite and the spherical Coxeter complex is a triangulation of S2 with 24 chambers (triangles), 36 edges and 14 vertices: the vertices are the cosets wWI with ∣I∣=2, namely the 4 cosets wW{s2,s3}, the 6 cosets wW{s1,s3} and the 4 cosets wW{s1,s2}, where W{s2,s3}≅W{s1,s2}≅S3 have order 6 and W{s1,s3}≅Z/2×Z/2 has order 4; the combinatorial Euler characteristic (vertices minus edges plus triangles) is 14−36+24=2.

(ii) The residue (equivalently the link) of a vertex of type I with ∣I∣=2 is the Coxeter complex of the rank-two parabolic WI: exactly ∣WI∣ chambers contain the vertex and the link is a cycle with ∣WI∣ edges and ∣WI∣ vertices. For I={s2,s3} this is the hexagon of WI≅S3 of type I2(3), with six chambers and six edges through the vertex, and for I={s1,s3} the 4-cycle of WI≅Z/2×Z/2 of type I2(2). The residue of an edge (∣I∣=1) is two points, and the residue of a chamber is empty.

(iii) The fundamental spherical triangle C∩S2 has dihedral angles π/3, π/3 and π/2, that is angle sum 7π/6, and the 24 chambers are its images under the 24 isometries ρ(w), w∈W, of the sphere, so all chambers are congruent spherical triangles. Each has round surface area π/6, and their total area is 24(π/6)=4π, the area of the round unit sphere.

(iv) ℓ(w0)=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣=6, w02=1, w0 corresponds to the reversal permutation of S4, and ρ(w0)esi=−es4−i for i=1,2,3; the permutation of The longest element as the opposition of the chamber, and longest elements of finite parabolics (1)(v) is si↦s4−i.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the three-element set S={s1,s2,s3} with the Coxeter matrix of type A3, the space V=RS with the Coxeter form B, the presented group W with length function ℓ, the canonical reflection homomorphism ρ with root system Φ=Φ+⊔Φ− and reflection set T, the dual action with chamber C, faces CI‾ and Tits cone, the arrangement A, the unit sphere S2, the coset face poset {wWI:I⊊S} with WI=⟨s:s∈I⟩, and the triangulation Σ of The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset and The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere.

[F1]

The Coxeter data of type A3: m(si,si)=1, m(si,sj)=3 for ∣i−j∣=1, m(si,sj)=2 for ∣i−j∣=2; B(esi,esj)=1 for i=j, −1/2 for ∣i−j∣=1 and 0 for ∣i−j∣=2; ρ(si)=resi with the reflection formula ra(v)=v−2B(v,a)a for B(a,a)=1, and every such ra is B-preserving; Φ={ρ(w)es:w∈W, s∈S}; every root has B-norm one (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order (2), The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone, Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, Coxeter diagrams: edges, labels, components and finite type, Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections (3)).

[F2]

Type A identification: si↦(i−1 i) extends to an isomorphism φ:W→S4 (the library's symmetric group on the letters {0,1,2,3}), and ℓ(w)=inv⁡(φ(w)) for every w∈W (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (4), Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn⁡(σ)=(−1)inv⁡(σ), and even and odd permutations).

[F3]
[F4]

Parabolic subsystems: for J⊆S one has WJ={w∈W:S(w)⊆J} with S(w) the support, (WJ,J) is a Coxeter system whose intrinsic length is the restriction of ℓ, and WJ∩S=J (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (1), (2)). Consequently: W{si}={1,si} has order 2; the restrictions to {s2,s3} and {s1,s2} are of type A2, so by (4) applied with n=3 the groups W{s2,s3} and W{s1,s2} are isomorphic to S3 of order 6; and (s1s3)2=1 because m(s1,s3)=2, so s1s3=s3s1 and W{s1,s3}={1,s1,s3,s1s3} has order 4: the images of these four elements under [F2] are 1, (0 1), (2 3) and (0 1)(2 3), which are distinct.

[F5]

The chamber tiling, the dual-basis description of the faces, the face dictionary and the triangulation: V=⋃w∈WwC; for the B-dual basis (vs)s∈S one has C={∑sλsvs:λs≥0} and CI‾={∑s∉Iλsvs:λs≥0}; the assignment wWI↦wCI‾ is a bijection onto the proper faces with wWI=vWJ  ⟺  wCI‾=vCJ‾ and wCI‾∩vCJ‾=wCI∪J∪S(v−1w)‾; the dihedral angle between Hes and Het is π/m(s,t) in the sense of the tangent sector computed in The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere (2); and Σ={wCI‾∩S2:w∈W, I⊊S} is a finite simplicial complex whose faces have the vertices ρ(w)vs/∥vs∥B (s∉I), with pairwise disjoint relative interiors covering S2 (The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere (1)-(4)).

[F6]

Since W is finite, there is a unique w0∈W with w0⋅C=−C, equivalently with N(w0)=Φ+; it satisfies ℓ(w0)=∣N(w0)∣=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣, w02=1, is the unique element of maximal length, and there is a permutation σ of S with ρ(w0)es=−eσ(s), equivalently w0sw0=σ(s), for every s∈S (The longest element as the opposition of the chamber, and longest elements of finite parabolics (1)(i)-(v)).

[F8]

A regular patch is parametrized on a compact Jordan region, and its area is the integral of the Gram density Jψ=det⁡(⟨ψi,ψj⟩)i,j=12 (Regular parametrized surface patches on compact Jordan parameter regions, The first fundamental form, Gram matrix, and area density of a surface patch, Surface area and scalar surface integrals on a regular patch). Injective C1 changes of coordinates with invertible derivative obey compact-Jordan change of variables (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set). Bounded sets with content-zero boundary are Jordan measurable; integrals of bounded continuous densities add over finitely many Jordan pieces with content-zero overlaps (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero, Additivity of the integral over finitely many Jordan pieces that fill a Jordan set up to content zero).

[F10]

For a subgroup H of a finite group G, [G:H]=∣G∣/∣H∣ (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F11]

Totally differentiable Euclidean maps obey the chain rule, and a C1 map between open subsets of R2 with invertible derivative has a local C1 inverse (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Verification

technique · direct; coset counts, rank-two incidences, the type-$A$ length formula, and a choice-free finite-patch area calculation
1.1F2F3F7algebra

By [F2] and [F3] the group W is finite, of order 24; hence by [F7] the form B is positive definite.

1.2F3F4F10algebra

The subgroup orders of [F4] and [F10] give the coset counts ∣W∣/∣WI∣ for the proper subsets I: ∣W∣/∣W{si}∣=12 for the three one-element I, and for ∣I∣=2 the values 24/6=4, 24/4=6 and 24/6=4 for I={s2,s3}, {s1,s3} and {s1,s2}.

1.3F4F5algebra

The faces containing wCI‾ are exactly uCK‾ with u∈wWI and K⊆I. If u=wx, x∈WI, then uCI‾=wCI‾ because x fixes this face pointwise by [F5]; and K⊆I gives CI‾⊆CK‾. Conversely, if wCI‾⊆uCK‾, their intersection is wCI‾, so [F5] and the dual-basis formula give I∪K∪S(u−1w)=I. Hence K⊆I and u−1w∈WI by [F4], equivalently u∈wWI.

1.4F2F3F6algebra

Let σ0∈S4 be the reversal permutation j↦3−j (j∈{0,1,2,3}); it satisfies inv⁡(σ0)=6 because every one of the six pairs i<j is inverted, and inv⁡(τ)≤6 for every τ∈S4 because an inversion set consists of pairs. Hence ℓ attains its maximum 6 at φ−1(σ0), and by [F6] the longest element w0 is the unique element of maximal length; thus w0=φ−1(σ0) corresponds to the reversal permutation, and ℓ(w0)=6=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣ and w02=1 by [F6].

2.1step 1.2F5algebra

By [F5] the faces of Σ are the cosets wWI with I⊊S; a face of type I is a spherical simplex on the ∣S∖I∣ vertices ρ(w)vs/∥vs∥B (s∉I). Hence the chambers (type I=∅) number ∣W∣/∣W∅∣=24, the edges (type ∣I∣=1) number 3⋅12=36, and the vertices (type ∣I∣=2, where the simplex is a single point) number 4+6+4=14 by step 1.2; the alternating face count of this triangulation is 14−36+24=2. Since ∣S∣=3, [F5] realizes Σ as a triangulation of S2. This proves the combinatorial part of (i).

2.2step 1.2step 1.3F4F5algebra

Let I={s,t} with ∣I∣=2 and let σ:=wCI‾ be a vertex. By step 1.3 the chambers containing σ are the chambers uC with u∈wWI, so there are ∣WI∣ of them; the edges containing σ are the faces uC{r}‾ with u∈wWI, r∈I (step 1.3 with K={r}), and two such faces coincide exactly when the cosets uW{r} and u′W{r′} coincide, by the dictionary uC{r}‾=u′C{r′}‾  ⟺  uW{r}=u′W{r′} of [F5]. Each chamber uC through σ contains exactly the two edges uC{s}‾ and uC{t}‾ through σ; and each edge uC{r}‾ through σ lies, by step 1.3 with I={r}, in exactly the two chambers uC and urC through σ. Counting the incidences between the chambers and the edges through σ by chambers gives twice ∣WI∣, and by edges gives twice the number e of edges; hence e=∣WI∣. The chambers through σ form a connected graph under the relation of sharing an edge, because WI=⟨s,t⟩ is generated by its two elements, so the consecutive chambers uC, usC share uC{s}‾ and uC, utC share uC{t}‾. A connected graph in which every vertex has degree 2 is a cycle; hence the link of σ is a cycle with ∣WI∣ edges and ∣WI∣ vertices, namely with 2⋅m(s,t) of each. Its chamber edges are indexed by the coset wWI and its vertex edges by the cosets uW{r} (u∈wWI, r∈I), which is the incidence structure of the Coxeter complex of the parabolic subsystem (WI,I): for I={s2,s3} (respectively {s1,s2}) this is the hexagon of I2(3) with 2⋅3=6 edges, and for I={s1,s3} the 4-cycle of I2(2). The same count with ∣I∣=1 shows that an edge lies in exactly ∣WI∣=2 chambers, so the link of an edge is two points, and the link of a chamber is empty. This proves (ii).

2.3F1F5F8F11F13step 1.1algebraconstruct

To compute the round area, use orthonormal coordinates for B (successively subtract projections from the three basis vectors and divide by their positive norms). Put Δ={(u,t):u,t≥0, u+t≤1}, p(u,t)=(1−u−t)vs1+uvs2+tvs3 and ψ=p/∥p∥B. The coefficient-sum functional L(∑iaivsi)=∑iai satisfies L(p)=1, so p≠0 on a neighbourhood of Δ; moreover radial projection is injective on the affine plane L=1, with inverse x↦x/L(x) where L(x)>0. Its derivative on that plane is injective: D(p/∥p∥B)h=0 forces h parallel to p, whereas L(h)=0 and L(p)=1. Thus ψ is a regular patch for C∩S2. For every w, ψw=ρ(w)ψ is a regular patch for its chamber, and B-invariance gives identical Gram matrices and therefore identical densities Jψw=Jψ. Let a=∫ΔJψ; each chamber has area a.

3.1F1F5step 2.1algebra

The three vertices of the spherical triangle C∩S2 lie each on a pair of the walls Hes1,Hes2,Hes3, so by the dihedral-angle clause of [F5] its interior angles are π/m(s1,s2)=π/3, π/m(s2,s3)=π/3 and π/m(s1,s3)=π/2, with sum 7π/6; every chamber is wC for a unique w∈W, and ρ(w) preserves B by [F1], hence is an isometry of (V,B) carrying C∩S2 onto wC∩S2; so all 24 chambers are congruent spherical triangles.

3.2F5F8F9F11F12F13step 2.3algebra

Here is the finite chart comparison needed to sum these areas; no independence of an arbitrary surface presentation is assumed. In orthonormal coordinates let η(ϕ,θ)=(sin⁡ϕcos⁡θ,sin⁡ϕsin⁡θ,cos⁡ϕ) and Rε=[ε,π−ε]×[ε,2π−ε], 0<ε<π/2. This is an injective regular chart, with Gram matrix diag⁡(1,sin⁡2ϕ), so Jη=sin⁡ϕ. Cut Rε by the chamber walls and let Ew,ε=η−1(ψw(Δ))∩Rε, Dw,ε=ψw−1(η(Rε))∩Δ. These compact sets are Jordan: away from the latitude-chart seam and poles, great circles have nonzero tangent and their chart preimages are locally smooth arcs; in the radial charts the chamber edges are straight segments, and latitude and longitude boundaries have smooth arc preimages. A finite cover of each compact arc by regular curve pieces suffices. A C1 curve on a neighbourhood of a compact interval has bounded derivative by [F12], and hence a Lipschitz bound M there by [F13]; it has content zero in the plane: divide the interval into n equal parts and cover each image by a square of side at most 2M times the part length (enlarging by 1/n2 if necessary); the total square area tends to zero. Finite unions and points have the same property, so the boundary criterion in [F8] applies, and the overlaps between different Ew,ε have content zero by [F5]. On a neighbourhood of Dw,ε the transition h=η−1∘ψw is an injective C1 coordinate change with invertible derivative: radial projection has the explicit inverse in step 2.3 and the latitude chart has a C1 inverse away from its seam and poles: at each point choose two ambient coordinate components on which its derivative has nonzero determinant and apply [F11]. The remaining sphere coordinate is locally the fixed-sign function ±1−xi2−xj2, since it is nonzero there; thus the local inverse also applies to ψw, and the inverses agree on overlaps by injectivity of η. The chain rule [F11] yields Gψw=DhT(Gη∘h)Dh, hence Jψw=(Jη∘h)∣det⁡Dh∣. Change of variables and finite additivity in [F8] now give ∑w∫Dw,εJψ=∑w∫Ew,εsin⁡ϕ=∫Rεsin⁡ϕ.

4.1F8F9F12F13step 2.3step 3.2step 3.1algebra

The omitted radial parameter sets approach the preimage of the single longitude seam and the two poles. That compact preimage has content zero: the seam lies on a great circle, whose radial preimage lies on a straight line, and each pole has at most one preimage. For any finite open rectangle cover of that set, compactness places all omitted points in the cover once ε is sufficiently small: otherwise a compact subset outside the cover would meet arbitrarily narrow seam or pole strips despite its image avoiding the seam and poles. Since Jψ is continuous and bounded on Δ, the omitted integral is bounded by its bound times the total area of such a cover, and so tends to zero. There are only 24 patches, hence the left side in step 3.2 tends to 24a. By [F9] the right side is (2π−2ε)∫επ−εsin⁡ϕ dϕ=(2π−2ε)2cos⁡ε, tending to 4π; the full latitude patch on [0,π]×[0,2π] itself has area ∫02π∫0πsin⁡ϕ dϕ dθ=4π, with its only seam identifications and rank failures on the parameter boundary. Thus the actual finite chamber sum equals the round sphere area, 24a=4π, and a=π/6. Together with step 3.1 this proves (iii). All covers and coordinate choices are finite; no choice principle is used.

5.1step 1.4F2F6algebra∎

Conjugating the adjacent transposition (i−1 i) by the reversal σ0 gives (σ0(i−1) σ0(i))=(4−i 3−i), which is the adjacent transposition (3−i 4−i), that is s4−i under the identification of [F2]; hence w0siw0=s4−i for i=1,2,3. By [F6] the permutation σ with ρ(w0)esi=−eσ(si) satisfies σ(si)=s4−i, so ρ(w0)esi=−es4−i. This proves (iv).

Remarks

  • The area uses symmetry and finite patch integrals. Steps 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 prove the needed chart comparison locally and divide the sphere area by the 24 congruent chambers. No spherical-excess theorem or examples-page supplier is used.

  • The residue is an incidence statement. Clause (ii) identifies the residue of a face with the Coxeter complex of the parabolic subsystem through its incidence structure (chambers, edges and their containment). It does not construct an abstract simplicial complex separate from Σ and does not assert a metric identification with a standard simplex.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

250 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources