Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Finite Reflection Arrangements and Spherical Coxeter Complexes — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This draft companion is a dependency leaf. Its exercises and examples use the theory of finite-reflection-arrangements-and-spherical-coxeter-complexes, together with the established prerequisites hilbert-space-geometry-and-riesz-representation for inner-product geometry, further-trigonometric-identities-and-inverses for principal angles, permutation-statistics-inversions-and-eulerian-numbers for finite permutation counts, and the-divergence-theorem-and-classical-stokes for the finite-Jordan integration results used in the sphere-area computation. No other theory page may depend on a supplier homed here.

Three worked computations test the constructions. The Coxeter complex of I2(5): the circle triangulated by the ten chambers computes the rank-two complex of I2(5): ten chambers, ten vertices, five root lines, the explicit dual vectors with B(us,ut)=cos⁡(π/5), and the circle triangulated by a decagon. The Coxeter complex of A3: a triangulation of the sphere and the residue of a proper parabolic counts the A3 complex — 24 triangles, 36 edges, 14 vertices — with the vertex types and their parabolic residues (the I2(3) hexagon and the I2(2) four-cycle), the dihedral angles π/3,π/3,π/2, and the reversal permutation as the longest element with ρ(w0)esi=−es4−i; each chamber has area π/6 and the total sphere area is 4π, proved by a finite-patch calculation and chamber symmetry. Infinite dihedral type: the chamber system is a line, not a sphere; the contractible model is deferred computes the degenerate rank-two case m(s,t)=∞: the chamber system is a line, U={Δ>0}∪{0}, there is no opposite chamber, and Φ is infinite with ℓ unbounded. The contractible model for infinite W (the Davis complex) belongs to the later page spherical-parabolic-cosets-and-the-davis-complex and is not used here.

Each example states all hypotheses and verifies the claimed calculation. A drawing or symbolic calculation alone does not certify a general theorem; the general statements tested here are proved on the theory page finite-reflection-arrangements-and-spherical-coxeter-complexes.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08Open item page →

The Coxeter complex of I2(5): the circle triangulated by the ten chambers

Example

Let S={s,t} with m(s,t)=5 and put c:=cos⁡(π/5), so that B(es,es)=B(et,et)=1 and B(es,et)=−c (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order (3)); let A, C, the faces CI‾, the sphere S1, the coset face poset and the triangulation Σ be as in The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset and The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere. Then:

(i) B is positive definite, ∣W∣=10, ∣Φ∣=10, ∣Φ+∣=∣T∣=5, and the arrangement A consists of the five distinct root lines Hα (α∈Φ+).

(ii) The five root lines cut S1 into ten arcs, and these arcs are exactly the spherical chambers wC∩S1 (w∈W); the complex Σ is a circle triangulated by ten edges and ten vertices, five of type {t} (the cosets wW{t}) and five of type {s} (the cosets wW{s}), with combinatorial Euler characteristic 10−10=0 (the number of vertices minus the number of edges).

(iii) The B-dual vectors are vs=(es+cet)/(1−c2) and vt=(ces+et)/(1−c2), with B(vs,vs)=B(vt,vt)=1/(1−c2) and B(vs,vt)=c/(1−c2); hence the two vertices us:=vs/∥vs∥B and ut:=vt/∥vt∥B of the fundamental chamber satisfy B(us,ut)=c=cos⁡(π/5), so that every spherical chamber subtends the angle arccos⁡c=π/5 at the centre, and the ten arcs account for the full turn 10⋅(π/5)=2π.

(iv) Each vertex of Σ lies in exactly two chambers and each chamber has exactly two vertices; the residue of a vertex of the coset wW{t} is the Coxeter complex of the rank-one parabolic W{t}≅Z/2, namely the two chambers wC and wtC, and symmetrically for the cosets wW{s}.

(v) The longest element satisfies ℓ(w0)=5=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣, w02=1, w0=(st)2s, and ρ(w0)es=−et, ρ(w0)et=−es; the permutation of The longest element as the opposition of the chamber, and longest elements of finite parabolics (1)(v) interchanges s and t.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the two-element set S={s,t} with m(s,t)=5, the constant c=cos⁡(π/5), the space V=RS with the Coxeter form B, the presented group W with length function ℓ, the canonical reflection homomorphism ρ with root system Φ, the dual action with chamber C, faces CI‾ and Tits cone U, the arrangement A, the unit sphere S1, the coset face poset {wWI:I⊊S} and the triangulation Σ of The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset and The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere.

[F1]

B(es,es)=B(et,et)=1 and B(es,et)=−c; the reflection formula is ra(v)=v−2B(v,a)a for B(a,a)=1, and in the ordered basis (es,et) of P=Res+Ret one has [ρ(s)]=[rs]=(−12c01) and [ρ(t)]=[rt]=(102c−1), so that [A]=(4c2−1−2c2c−1) for A:=ρ(s)ρ(t)=ρ(st), with det⁡A=1, A5=I and Ak≠I for 0<k<5 (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order (2), (3)(i)-(iv), The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone).

[F3]

W is the group presented on {s,t} by s2=t2=(st)5=1; ρ is the homomorphism with ρ(s)=rs, ρ(t)=rt, and Φ={ρ(w)es:w∈W}∪{ρ(w)et:w∈W} (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone).

[F4]

Φ=Φ+⊔Φ− with Φ+=Φ∩V+, V+={λes+μet:λ,μ≥0} and V+∩(−V+)={0}, and α↦tα is a bijection Φ+→T (Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots (1), (2), The inversion formula ∣N(w)∣=ℓ(w), the root-reflection dictionary and strong exchange (1)(iv)).

[F5]

Chambers and faces of the finite chamber system: V=⋃w∈WwC, distinct closed chambers have disjoint interiors, CI‾={∑s∉Iλsvs:λs≥0} for the B-dual basis (vs)s∈S, the assignment wWI↦wCI‾ is a bijection onto the proper faces with wWI=vWJ  ⟺  wCI‾=vCJ‾ and wCI‾∩vCJ‾=wCI∪J∪S(v−1w)‾, and Σ realizes S1 as a simplicial complex with one maximal simplex per chamber (The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere (1)-(4)).

[F6]

For J⊆S, WJ={w∈W:S(w)⊆J}, where S(w) is the support of a reduced expression, and WJ∩S=J; the subsystem (W{t},{t}) is a Coxeter system with W{t}={1,t}, and symmetrically W{s}={1,s} (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (1), (2)).

[F7]

The longest element: for finite W there is a unique w0 with N(w0)=Φ+, equivalently with w0⋅C=−C, and then ℓ(w0)=∣N(w0)∣=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣, w02=1, and there is a permutation σ of S with ρ(w0)es=−eσ(s) for every s∈S, equivalently w0sw0=σ(s) (The longest element as the opposition of the chamber, and longest elements of finite parabolics (1)(i), (ii), (iv), (v), The geometric inversion set N(w) of an element of a Coxeter group).

[F8]

The B-dual family: there are vs,vt∈V with B(vs,es)=B(vt,et)=1 and B(vs,et)=B(vt,es)=0, and they form a basis of V (The dual family (b∗)b∈B associated to a Hamel basis B, defined by b∗(c)=δbc, The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension).

[F9]

∥v∥B=B(v,v)1/2 is a norm, ∥v∥B>0 for v≠0, and arccos⁡(cos⁡x)=x for x∈[0,π]; for B-unit vectors u,u′ we define their principal angle to be arccos⁡B(u,u′) (The induced length is a norm, Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine).

[F10]

For the determinant of a matrix: det⁡(AB)=det⁡Adet⁡B, det⁡Ak=(det⁡A)k, and the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes, For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B), The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries).

[F11]

For a subgroup H of a finite group G, the coset count is [G:H]=∣G∣/∣H∣ (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

Verification

technique · explicit computation in the rank-two plane, with the two generators represented by the matrices of [F1]
1.1F2algebra

The number c=cos⁡(π/5) satisfies 4c2−2c−1=0: with θ:=π/5 one has cos⁡2θ=2c2−1 and cos⁡3θ=4c3−3c by the addition formulas, while 3θ=π−2θ gives cos⁡3θ=−cos⁡2θ=−(2c2−1) by the shift formula cos⁡(π−x)=−cos⁡x; hence 4c3−3c=−2c2+1, that is (c+1)(4c2−2c−1)=0, and c>0>−1 forces 4c2−2c−1=0, equivalently 4c2−1=2c and 4c2−2c=1.

1.2F1F10algebra

ρ(s)2=ρ(s2)=I and [ρ(s)] is triangular with diagonal entries −1,1, so det⁡ρ(s)=−1; with det⁡A=1 and det⁡Ak=(det⁡A)k this gives det⁡Ak=1 for every k∈Z, so no power of A equals ρ(s).

1.3F1F3algebra

Put z:=st. Then t=sz, szs=ts=z−1, and therefore szk=z−ks for every integer k. Substitute t=sz into a word in s,t and move every s to the right by this identity, cancelling s2=1; the value is zk or zks. Since z5=1, reduce k modulo 5. Thus W={(st)k,(st)ks:0≤k<5} has at most ten elements and is finite.

1.4F1F8algebra

By the positive-definiteness clause of [F1], 1−c2=sin⁡2(π/5)>0. The dual vectors are vs=(es+cet)/(1−c2) and vt=(ces+et)/(1−c2): with vs=αes+βet the conditions B(vs,es)=1 and B(vs,et)=0 read α−cβ=1 and β−cα=0, that is β=cα and α(1−c2)=1; the computation for vt is symmetric. Then B(vs,vs)=αB(vs,es)+βB(vs,et)=α=1/(1−c2) and B(vs,vt)=B(vs,ces+et)/(1−c2)=c/(1−c2), and B(vt,vt)=1/(1−c2) similarly.

1.5F5F6algebra

The faces containing a face wCI‾ are exactly the faces uCK‾ with u∈wWI and K⊆I: if K⊆I and u=wx with x∈WI then uCK‾⊇uCI‾=wCI‾ because x fixes CI‾ pointwise and CI‾⊆CK‾; conversely wCI‾⊆u′CK‾ makes their intersection equal to wCI‾. By [F5] that intersection is wCI∪K∪S(u′−1w)‾; the dual-basis formula of [F5] distinguishes the face types, so I∪K∪S(u′−1w)=I. Hence K⊆I and S(u′−1w)⊆I, giving u′−1w∈WI by [F6], equivalently u′∈wWI. Here C∅‾=C.

2.1step 1.2F1F3algebra

ρ(s)Aρ(s)−1=ρ(s)ρ(s)ρ(t)ρ(s)−1=ρ(t)ρ(s)=A−1, using ρ(s)−1=ρ(s) and A−1=ρ(t)−1ρ(s)−1=ρ(t)ρ(s); consequently ρ(t)=ρ(s)A and every element of the subgroup generated by ρ(s) and ρ(t) has the form Ak or Akρ(s) with k∈Z.

2.2step 1.3F1F3F4algebra

The root set is Φ={±es, ±et, ±2c(es+et), ±(2ces+et), ±(es+2cet)}: in the basis (es,et) the matrices of Ak applied to es give Aes=2c(es+et), A2es=et, A3es=−(2ces+et) and A4es=−(es+2cet) (using 4c2−1=2c and 4c2−2c=1), and applying ρ(s), whose matrix sends es↦−es and et↦2ces+et, to those five vectors gives −es, es+2cet, 2ces+et, −et and −2c(es+et); since by step 1.3 every element of W is (st)k or (st)ks, the roots ρ(w)es (w∈W) are exactly those ten vectors. The roots ρ(w)et are the values ρ((st)k)A2es=Ak+2es and ρ((st)ks)et=Ak(2ces+et); the first five are et, −(2ces+et), −(es+2cet), es and 2c(es+et), and the second five are 2ces+et, es+2cet, −es, −2c(es+et) and −et, so both families lie in the displayed set and Φ equals it. The five vectors es, et, 2c(es+et), 2ces+et and es+2cet have pairwise different coordinate pairs in the basis (es,et) (because 2c≠1: 4c2−2c−1 vanishes at c but not at c=12) and lie in V+∖{0}, while their negatives lie in −V+∖{0}; hence the five are pairwise distinct, and V+∩(−V+)={0} shows that none of the ten is a negative of another of the five, so the displayed set has ten elements. By [F4] each root lies in V+∖{0}∪(−V+∖{0}), so Φ+=Φ∩V+ consists exactly of those five vectors: ∣Φ∣=10 and ∣Φ+∣=5.

2.3step 1.5F5F6algebra

The vertex C{t}‾=R≥0vs lies in exactly two chambers, namely C and tC: by step 1.5 with I={t} the chambers containing it are the uC with u∈W{t}={1,t}, and these are distinct. Symmetrically the vertex C{s}‾=R≥0vt lies in exactly the chambers C and sC; every vertex of Σ is of the form wC{t}‾ or wC{s}‾ and hence, by the W-action, lies in exactly two chambers. Each chamber wC has exactly the two vertices wC{s}‾ and wC{t}‾, since these are exactly the two one-dimensional faces of C by the dual-basis formula of [F5]. The residue of the vertex wW{t} is therefore the two-point complex {wC,wtC}, which is the Coxeter complex of the rank-one system (W{t},{t}), and symmetrically for wW{s}. This proves (iv).

3.1step 1.3step 1.2step 2.1F1F10algebra

The ten elements Ak and Akρ(s) (0≤k<5) are pairwise distinct: the Ak are distinct by A5=I and Ak≠I for 0<k<5, the Akρ(s) are distinct for the same reason, and Ak=Ajρ(s) is impossible because the left side has determinant 1 while det⁡ρ(s)=−1. Hence the image group ρ(W)=⟨ρ(s),ρ(t)⟩ has at least ten elements, so ∣W∣≥10; combined with step 1.3 this gives ∣W∣=10.

3.2step 2.2F4algebra

By steps 1.3 and 2.2 the group W is finite, so the finiteness criterion applies; by clause (1) of Finiteness criterion: W is finite exactly when the Coxeter form is positive definite the form B is positive definite. The map α↦tα is a bijection Φ+→T by [F4], so ∣T∣=5; and H−α=Hα because B(v,−α)=−B(v,α), so A={Hα:α∈Φ+}. The five lines are pairwise distinct: the five positive roots correspond in the coordinates (ys,yt) to the directions (1,0), (0,1), (2c,2c), (2c,1) and (1,2c); two of these are proportional only if the corresponding pairs differ by a common nonzero factor, which fails for (1,0) and (0,1) against all others (a zero coordinate stays zero) and for the remaining three, as is checked by comparing ratios: (2c,2c) versus (1,2c) would force 2c=1, (2c,2c) versus (2c,1) likewise, and (2c,1) versus (1,2c) would force 4c2=1, hence 2c+1=1 and c=0, contrary to 4c2−2c−1=−1≠0. This proves (i).

3.3step 2.2F1F7algebra

Put w1:=(st)2s; then ρ(w1)=A2ρ(s) has matrix (0−11−2c)(−12c01)=(0−1−10), so ρ(w1)es=−et and ρ(w1)et=−es; applied to the five positive roots in the order of step 2.2 this gives −et, −es, −2c(es+et), −(es+2cet) and −(2ces+et), so ρ(w1)Φ+=Φ− and hence N(w1)=Φ+.

4.1F5F6F11step 1.3step 2.2step 3.1algebra

By [F5] the chamber C equals {λvs+μvt:λ,μ≥0}, the cone over the segment [vs,vt], and 0∉[vs,vt] because vs,vt are linearly independent; the radial projection x↦x/∥x∥B of that segment is therefore a continuous injective map of a connected set, so C∩S1 is an arc with endpoints us and ut. Its images ρ(w)(C∩S1)=wC∩S1 under the ten elements of W are the ten spherical chambers; by [F5] the closed chambers cover S1 and distinct closed chambers have disjoint interiors, so these ten closed arcs cover the circle and meet only in their endpoints, and the five root lines meet S1 in exactly the ten endpoints; hence the five lines cut S1 into the ten arcs wC∩S1. The triangulation Σ has one edge per chamber and one vertex per coset wW{s}, wW{t}; by [F6] and [F11] these cosets number ∣W∣/∣W{t}∣=10/2=5 and ∣W∣/∣W{s}∣=5, so Σ is a circle with ten edges and ten vertices and Euler characteristic 10−10=0.

5.1step 4.1step 1.4F1F9algebra

Consequently B(us,ut)=B(vs,vt)/(∥vs∥B∥vt∥B)=(c/(1−c2))/(1/(1−c2))=c, so the endpoints of the fundamental arc subtend the principal angle arccos⁡c=arccos⁡(cos⁡(π/5))=π/5. For each w∈W the map ρ(w) preserves B by [F1] and therefore preserves ∥⋅∥B, so B(ρ(w)us,ρ(w)ut)=B(us,ut)=c; hence every spherical chamber subtends the same angle π/5, and the ten arcs account for the full turn 10⋅(π/5)=2π.

6.1step 2.2step 3.3F7algebra∎

By [F7] the element with N(w0)=Φ+ is unique, so w1=w0; consequently ℓ(w0)=∣N(w0)∣=∣Φ+∣=5=∣T∣, w02=1, and the permutation σ of [F7] satisfies ρ(w0)es=−eσ(s); since ρ(w0)es=−et and ρ(w0)et=−es, σ interchanges s and t. This proves (v) and completes all clauses.

Remarks

  • The two vertices of the fundamental arc. The arc C∩S1 is cut out by the two walls Het and Hes through its endpoints us and ut, in agreement with the general vertex description C∩S1∩⋂t≠sHet={vs/∥vs∥B} of The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere (2).

  • Lengths versus angles. Clause (iii) computes the principal angles subtended by the ten arcs; it does not use, and does not assert, any identification of a path length on S1 with that angle, which belongs to the metric theory of spherical complexes on the in-run page spherical-simplex-metrics-angular-links-and-cones.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08Open item page →

The Coxeter complex of A3: a triangulation of the sphere and the residue of a proper parabolic

Example

Let S={s1,s2,s3} with m(si,si)=1, m(si,sj)=3 when ∣i−j∣=1 and m(si,sj)=2 when ∣i−j∣=2 (type A3; thus W≅S4 and ∣W∣=24), and let A, C, the faces CI‾, the sphere S2, the coset face poset and the complex Σ be as in The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset and The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere. Then:

(i) B is positive definite and the spherical Coxeter complex is a triangulation of S2 with 24 chambers (triangles), 36 edges and 14 vertices: the vertices are the cosets wWI with ∣I∣=2, namely the 4 cosets wW{s2,s3}, the 6 cosets wW{s1,s3} and the 4 cosets wW{s1,s2}, where W{s2,s3}≅W{s1,s2}≅S3 have order 6 and W{s1,s3}≅Z/2×Z/2 has order 4; the combinatorial Euler characteristic (vertices minus edges plus triangles) is 14−36+24=2.

(ii) The residue (equivalently the link) of a vertex of type I with ∣I∣=2 is the Coxeter complex of the rank-two parabolic WI: exactly ∣WI∣ chambers contain the vertex and the link is a cycle with ∣WI∣ edges and ∣WI∣ vertices. For I={s2,s3} this is the hexagon of WI≅S3 of type I2(3), with six chambers and six edges through the vertex, and for I={s1,s3} the 4-cycle of WI≅Z/2×Z/2 of type I2(2). The residue of an edge (∣I∣=1) is two points, and the residue of a chamber is empty.

(iii) The fundamental spherical triangle C∩S2 has dihedral angles π/3, π/3 and π/2, that is angle sum 7π/6, and the 24 chambers are its images under the 24 isometries ρ(w), w∈W, of the sphere, so all chambers are congruent spherical triangles. Each has round surface area π/6, and their total area is 24(π/6)=4π, the area of the round unit sphere.

(iv) ℓ(w0)=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣=6, w02=1, w0 corresponds to the reversal permutation of S4, and ρ(w0)esi=−es4−i for i=1,2,3; the permutation of The longest element as the opposition of the chamber, and longest elements of finite parabolics (1)(v) is si↦s4−i.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the three-element set S={s1,s2,s3} with the Coxeter matrix of type A3, the space V=RS with the Coxeter form B, the presented group W with length function ℓ, the canonical reflection homomorphism ρ with root system Φ=Φ+⊔Φ− and reflection set T, the dual action with chamber C, faces CI‾ and Tits cone, the arrangement A, the unit sphere S2, the coset face poset {wWI:I⊊S} with WI=⟨s:s∈I⟩, and the triangulation Σ of The finite reflection arrangement, its chambers, the spherical chamber complex, and the coset face poset and The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere.

[F1]

The Coxeter data of type A3: m(si,si)=1, m(si,sj)=3 for ∣i−j∣=1, m(si,sj)=2 for ∣i−j∣=2; B(esi,esj)=1 for i=j, −1/2 for ∣i−j∣=1 and 0 for ∣i−j∣=2; ρ(si)=resi with the reflection formula ra(v)=v−2B(v,a)a for B(a,a)=1, and every such ra is B-preserving; Φ={ρ(w)es:w∈W, s∈S}; every root has B-norm one (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order (2), The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone, Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, Coxeter diagrams: edges, labels, components and finite type, Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections (3)).

[F2]

Type A identification: si↦(i−1 i) extends to an isomorphism φ:W→S4 (the library's symmetric group on the letters {0,1,2,3}), and ℓ(w)=inv⁡(φ(w)) for every w∈W (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (4), Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn⁡(σ)=(−1)inv⁡(σ), and even and odd permutations).

[F3]
[F4]

Parabolic subsystems: for J⊆S one has WJ={w∈W:S(w)⊆J} with S(w) the support, (WJ,J) is a Coxeter system whose intrinsic length is the restriction of ℓ, and WJ∩S=J (Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification (1), (2)). Consequently: W{si}={1,si} has order 2; the restrictions to {s2,s3} and {s1,s2} are of type A2, so by (4) applied with n=3 the groups W{s2,s3} and W{s1,s2} are isomorphic to S3 of order 6; and (s1s3)2=1 because m(s1,s3)=2, so s1s3=s3s1 and W{s1,s3}={1,s1,s3,s1s3} has order 4: the images of these four elements under [F2] are 1, (0 1), (2 3) and (0 1)(2 3), which are distinct.

[F5]

The chamber tiling, the dual-basis description of the faces, the face dictionary and the triangulation: V=⋃w∈WwC; for the B-dual basis (vs)s∈S one has C={∑sλsvs:λs≥0} and CI‾={∑s∉Iλsvs:λs≥0}; the assignment wWI↦wCI‾ is a bijection onto the proper faces with wWI=vWJ  ⟺  wCI‾=vCJ‾ and wCI‾∩vCJ‾=wCI∪J∪S(v−1w)‾; the dihedral angle between Hes and Het is π/m(s,t) in the sense of the tangent sector computed in The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere (2); and Σ={wCI‾∩S2:w∈W, I⊊S} is a finite simplicial complex whose faces have the vertices ρ(w)vs/∥vs∥B (s∉I), with pairwise disjoint relative interiors covering S2 (The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere (1)-(4)).

[F6]

Since W is finite, there is a unique w0∈W with w0⋅C=−C, equivalently with N(w0)=Φ+; it satisfies ℓ(w0)=∣N(w0)∣=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣, w02=1, is the unique element of maximal length, and there is a permutation σ of S with ρ(w0)es=−eσ(s), equivalently w0sw0=σ(s), for every s∈S (The longest element as the opposition of the chamber, and longest elements of finite parabolics (1)(i)-(v)).

[F8]

A regular patch is parametrized on a compact Jordan region, and its area is the integral of the Gram density Jψ=det⁡(⟨ψi,ψj⟩)i,j=12 (Regular parametrized surface patches on compact Jordan parameter regions, The first fundamental form, Gram matrix, and area density of a surface patch, Surface area and scalar surface integrals on a regular patch). Injective C1 changes of coordinates with invertible derivative obey compact-Jordan change of variables (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set). Bounded sets with content-zero boundary are Jordan measurable; integrals of bounded continuous densities add over finitely many Jordan pieces with content-zero overlaps (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero, Additivity of the integral over finitely many Jordan pieces that fill a Jordan set up to content zero).

[F10]

For a subgroup H of a finite group G, [G:H]=∣G∣/∣H∣ (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[F11]

Totally differentiable Euclidean maps obey the chain rule, and a C1 map between open subsets of R2 with invertible derivative has a local C1 inverse (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Verification

technique · direct; coset counts, rank-two incidences, the type-$A$ length formula, and a choice-free finite-patch area calculation
1.1F2F3F7algebra

By [F2] and [F3] the group W is finite, of order 24; hence by [F7] the form B is positive definite.

1.2F3F4F10algebra

The subgroup orders of [F4] and [F10] give the coset counts ∣W∣/∣WI∣ for the proper subsets I: ∣W∣/∣W{si}∣=12 for the three one-element I, and for ∣I∣=2 the values 24/6=4, 24/4=6 and 24/6=4 for I={s2,s3}, {s1,s3} and {s1,s2}.

1.3F4F5algebra

The faces containing wCI‾ are exactly uCK‾ with u∈wWI and K⊆I. If u=wx, x∈WI, then uCI‾=wCI‾ because x fixes this face pointwise by [F5]; and K⊆I gives CI‾⊆CK‾. Conversely, if wCI‾⊆uCK‾, their intersection is wCI‾, so [F5] and the dual-basis formula give I∪K∪S(u−1w)=I. Hence K⊆I and u−1w∈WI by [F4], equivalently u∈wWI.

1.4F2F3F6algebra

Let σ0∈S4 be the reversal permutation j↦3−j (j∈{0,1,2,3}); it satisfies inv⁡(σ0)=6 because every one of the six pairs i<j is inverted, and inv⁡(τ)≤6 for every τ∈S4 because an inversion set consists of pairs. Hence ℓ attains its maximum 6 at φ−1(σ0), and by [F6] the longest element w0 is the unique element of maximal length; thus w0=φ−1(σ0) corresponds to the reversal permutation, and ℓ(w0)=6=∣Φ+∣=∣T∣ and w02=1 by [F6].

2.1step 1.2F5algebra

By [F5] the faces of Σ are the cosets wWI with I⊊S; a face of type I is a spherical simplex on the ∣S∖I∣ vertices ρ(w)vs/∥vs∥B (s∉I). Hence the chambers (type I=∅) number ∣W∣/∣W∅∣=24, the edges (type ∣I∣=1) number 3⋅12=36, and the vertices (type ∣I∣=2, where the simplex is a single point) number 4+6+4=14 by step 1.2; the alternating face count of this triangulation is 14−36+24=2. Since ∣S∣=3, [F5] realizes Σ as a triangulation of S2. This proves the combinatorial part of (i).

2.2step 1.2step 1.3F4F5algebra

Let I={s,t} with ∣I∣=2 and let σ:=wCI‾ be a vertex. By step 1.3 the chambers containing σ are the chambers uC with u∈wWI, so there are ∣WI∣ of them; the edges containing σ are the faces uC{r}‾ with u∈wWI, r∈I (step 1.3 with K={r}), and two such faces coincide exactly when the cosets uW{r} and u′W{r′} coincide, by the dictionary uC{r}‾=u′C{r′}‾  ⟺  uW{r}=u′W{r′} of [F5]. Each chamber uC through σ contains exactly the two edges uC{s}‾ and uC{t}‾ through σ; and each edge uC{r}‾ through σ lies, by step 1.3 with I={r}, in exactly the two chambers uC and urC through σ. Counting the incidences between the chambers and the edges through σ by chambers gives twice ∣WI∣, and by edges gives twice the number e of edges; hence e=∣WI∣. The chambers through σ form a connected graph under the relation of sharing an edge, because WI=⟨s,t⟩ is generated by its two elements, so the consecutive chambers uC, usC share uC{s}‾ and uC, utC share uC{t}‾. A connected graph in which every vertex has degree 2 is a cycle; hence the link of σ is a cycle with ∣WI∣ edges and ∣WI∣ vertices, namely with 2⋅m(s,t) of each. Its chamber edges are indexed by the coset wWI and its vertex edges by the cosets uW{r} (u∈wWI, r∈I), which is the incidence structure of the Coxeter complex of the parabolic subsystem (WI,I): for I={s2,s3} (respectively {s1,s2}) this is the hexagon of I2(3) with 2⋅3=6 edges, and for I={s1,s3} the 4-cycle of I2(2). The same count with ∣I∣=1 shows that an edge lies in exactly ∣WI∣=2 chambers, so the link of an edge is two points, and the link of a chamber is empty. This proves (ii).

2.3F1F5F8F11F13step 1.1algebraconstruct

To compute the round area, use orthonormal coordinates for B (successively subtract projections from the three basis vectors and divide by their positive norms). Put Δ={(u,t):u,t≥0, u+t≤1}, p(u,t)=(1−u−t)vs1+uvs2+tvs3 and ψ=p/∥p∥B. The coefficient-sum functional L(∑iaivsi)=∑iai satisfies L(p)=1, so p≠0 on a neighbourhood of Δ; moreover radial projection is injective on the affine plane L=1, with inverse x↦x/L(x) where L(x)>0. Its derivative on that plane is injective: D(p/∥p∥B)h=0 forces h parallel to p, whereas L(h)=0 and L(p)=1. Thus ψ is a regular patch for C∩S2. For every w, ψw=ρ(w)ψ is a regular patch for its chamber, and B-invariance gives identical Gram matrices and therefore identical densities Jψw=Jψ. Let a=∫ΔJψ; each chamber has area a.

3.1F1F5step 2.1algebra

The three vertices of the spherical triangle C∩S2 lie each on a pair of the walls Hes1,Hes2,Hes3, so by the dihedral-angle clause of [F5] its interior angles are π/m(s1,s2)=π/3, π/m(s2,s3)=π/3 and π/m(s1,s3)=π/2, with sum 7π/6; every chamber is wC for a unique w∈W, and ρ(w) preserves B by [F1], hence is an isometry of (V,B) carrying C∩S2 onto wC∩S2; so all 24 chambers are congruent spherical triangles.

3.2F5F8F9F11F12F13step 2.3algebra

Here is the finite chart comparison needed to sum these areas; no independence of an arbitrary surface presentation is assumed. In orthonormal coordinates let η(ϕ,θ)=(sin⁡ϕcos⁡θ,sin⁡ϕsin⁡θ,cos⁡ϕ) and Rε=[ε,π−ε]×[ε,2π−ε], 0<ε<π/2. This is an injective regular chart, with Gram matrix diag⁡(1,sin⁡2ϕ), so Jη=sin⁡ϕ. Cut Rε by the chamber walls and let Ew,ε=η−1(ψw(Δ))∩Rε, Dw,ε=ψw−1(η(Rε))∩Δ. These compact sets are Jordan: away from the latitude-chart seam and poles, great circles have nonzero tangent and their chart preimages are locally smooth arcs; in the radial charts the chamber edges are straight segments, and latitude and longitude boundaries have smooth arc preimages. A finite cover of each compact arc by regular curve pieces suffices. A C1 curve on a neighbourhood of a compact interval has bounded derivative by [F12], and hence a Lipschitz bound M there by [F13]; it has content zero in the plane: divide the interval into n equal parts and cover each image by a square of side at most 2M times the part length (enlarging by 1/n2 if necessary); the total square area tends to zero. Finite unions and points have the same property, so the boundary criterion in [F8] applies, and the overlaps between different Ew,ε have content zero by [F5]. On a neighbourhood of Dw,ε the transition h=η−1∘ψw is an injective C1 coordinate change with invertible derivative: radial projection has the explicit inverse in step 2.3 and the latitude chart has a C1 inverse away from its seam and poles: at each point choose two ambient coordinate components on which its derivative has nonzero determinant and apply [F11]. The remaining sphere coordinate is locally the fixed-sign function ±1−xi2−xj2, since it is nonzero there; thus the local inverse also applies to ψw, and the inverses agree on overlaps by injectivity of η. The chain rule [F11] yields Gψw=DhT(Gη∘h)Dh, hence Jψw=(Jη∘h)∣det⁡Dh∣. Change of variables and finite additivity in [F8] now give ∑w∫Dw,εJψ=∑w∫Ew,εsin⁡ϕ=∫Rεsin⁡ϕ.

4.1F8F9F12F13step 2.3step 3.2step 3.1algebra

The omitted radial parameter sets approach the preimage of the single longitude seam and the two poles. That compact preimage has content zero: the seam lies on a great circle, whose radial preimage lies on a straight line, and each pole has at most one preimage. For any finite open rectangle cover of that set, compactness places all omitted points in the cover once ε is sufficiently small: otherwise a compact subset outside the cover would meet arbitrarily narrow seam or pole strips despite its image avoiding the seam and poles. Since Jψ is continuous and bounded on Δ, the omitted integral is bounded by its bound times the total area of such a cover, and so tends to zero. There are only 24 patches, hence the left side in step 3.2 tends to 24a. By [F9] the right side is (2π−2ε)∫επ−εsin⁡ϕ dϕ=(2π−2ε)2cos⁡ε, tending to 4π; the full latitude patch on [0,π]×[0,2π] itself has area ∫02π∫0πsin⁡ϕ dϕ dθ=4π, with its only seam identifications and rank failures on the parameter boundary. Thus the actual finite chamber sum equals the round sphere area, 24a=4π, and a=π/6. Together with step 3.1 this proves (iii). All covers and coordinate choices are finite; no choice principle is used.

5.1step 1.4F2F6algebra∎

Conjugating the adjacent transposition (i−1 i) by the reversal σ0 gives (σ0(i−1) σ0(i))=(4−i 3−i), which is the adjacent transposition (3−i 4−i), that is s4−i under the identification of [F2]; hence w0siw0=s4−i for i=1,2,3. By [F6] the permutation σ with ρ(w0)esi=−eσ(si) satisfies σ(si)=s4−i, so ρ(w0)esi=−es4−i. This proves (iv).

Remarks

  • The area uses symmetry and finite patch integrals. Steps 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 prove the needed chart comparison locally and divide the sphere area by the 24 congruent chambers. No spherical-excess theorem or examples-page supplier is used.

  • The residue is an incidence statement. Clause (ii) identifies the residue of a face with the Coxeter complex of the parabolic subsystem through its incidence structure (chambers, edges and their containment). It does not construct an abstract simplicial complex separate from Σ and does not assert a metric identification with a standard simplex.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Infinite dihedral type: the chamber system is a line, not a sphere; the contractible model is deferred

Example

Let S={s,t} with m(s,t)=∞ (infinite dihedral type), so that B(es,et)=−1 and B is positive semidefinite with radical R(es+et) (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clause (3)(i)); write a functional f∈V∗ as (ys,yt)=(f(es),f(et)) and put Δ(f):=f(es+et)=ys+yt. Let C, the chambers wC and the Tits cone U=⋃w∈WwC be as in The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes and The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional. Then:

(i) The generators act by s:(ys,yt)↦(−ys, 2ys+yt) and t:(ys,yt)↦(ys+2yt, −yt), and Δ is W-invariant. The fundamental chamber is the closed positive quadrant C={ys≥0, yt≥0}, and the chambers wC (w∈W) are the cones over the unit intervals [k,k+1] (k∈Z) of the affine line {Δ=1}; their relative interiors are pairwise disjoint.

(ii) U={f:Δ(f)>0}∪{0}, so U≠V∗; the nonzero points of the line {Δ=0} lie outside U, and 0∉U∘.

(iii) There is no w∈W with wC=−C: indeed every nonzero f∈−C has Δ(f)<0, hence −C∖{0} is disjoint from U, while every chamber lies in U. Consequently Φ is infinite and the length function ℓ is unbounded on W, so W has no longest element; the spherical conclusion of The finite chamber tiling, the face-stabiliser identification, and the spherical Coxeter complex as a triangulation of the sphere fails at its finiteness hypothesis.

(iv) The rays of U are the nonzero points of the chart {Δ=1}: the map f↦f/Δ(f) is a bijection from (U∖{0})/R>0 onto {Δ=1}≅R, and the images of the chambers are the unit intervals [k,k+1]. The chamber subdivision is therefore infinite and has no finite subcomplex covering it; in particular the complex is not a finite sphere. The construction of a contractible W-complex for infinite W (the Davis complex) and its comparison with this chamber system belong to the later page spherical-parabolic-cosets-and-the-davis-complex (order 1768); no result of that page is used or asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Coxeter system with S={s,t} and m(s,t)=∞, the form B on V=RS, the dual action on V∗ with chamber C, chambers wC and Tits cone U, and a functional written as (ys,yt) with Δ=ys+yt.

[F1]

B is symmetric bilinear with B(es,es)=B(et,et)=1 and B(es,et)=−1, and B∣P on P=Res+Ret is positive semidefinite with radical R(es+et); the reflection formula is ra(v)=v−2B(v,a)a for B(a,a)=1, so rs(es)=−es, rs(et)=et+2es, rt(et)=−et, rt(es)=es+2et; the product A:=ρ(st)=rsrt has matrix (3−22−1)=I+N with N=(2−22−2)≠0 and N2=0, so Ak=I+kN for every k∈Z (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clauses (1)-(3)); and ρ is the canonical reflection homomorphism with root system Φ={ρ(w)es:w∈W, s∈S} (The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone).

[F2]

The dual action is (w⋅f)(v)=f(ρ(w)−1v), and in the coordinates (ys,yt) its generators act by s:(ys,yt)↦(−ys, 2ys+yt) and t:(ys,yt)↦(ys+2yt, −yt); the closed chamber is C={f:f(es)≥0, f(et)≥0} and the chambers of the chamber system are the sets wC (The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes, The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling, clause (3), The Tits cone, its interior, and the negative-root set of a functional).

[F3]

The open chambers wC∘ (w∈W) are pairwise disjoint (Chamber collisions, point stabilizers, and the intersection rule, clause (6)).

[F4]

0∈U∘ if and only if W is finite (The interior of the Tits cone, finite parabolic stabilizers, and local finiteness, clause (5)).

Verification

technique · explicit coordinate computation with the dual action
1.1F2algebragiven

In the coordinates (ys,yt) the generators act by the displayed formulas [F2], and both fix Δ: (−ys)+(2ys+yt)=ys+yt and (ys+2yt)+(−yt)=ys+yt. Since S generates W and the dual action is a left action, Δ(w⋅f)=Δ(f) for every w∈W.

1.2F1algebragiven

The element st satisfies ρ(st)=rsrt and by [F1] its matrix on P is A=I+N with N≠0 and N2=0; hence ρ((st)k)=Ak=I+kN≠I for every k≠0 (for negative k use (I+N)−1=I−N, which holds because N2=0). Therefore (st)k≠1 in W for every k≠0, and W is infinite.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

For f with Δ(f)=1 write a:=ys, so yt=1−a; then [F2] gives s⋅f=(−a, 2a+1−a)=(−a, 1+a), that is, s acts on the line {Δ=1} by a↦−a, and t⋅f=(a+2(1−a), −(1−a))=(2−a, a−1), that is, a↦2−a; since the action is a left action, (st)k acts by a↦a−2k and s(st)k by a↦−a+2k, so the images of C∩{Δ=1}={0≤a≤1}=[0,1] under W include every interval [2k,2k+1] and [2k−1,2k], that is, every unit interval [k,k+1] with k∈Z. Conversely s sends a unit interval [k,k+1] to [−k−1,−k] and t to [1−k,2−k], both unit intervals, so by induction on length every w sends [0,1] to a unit interval. Since the w act linearly and C={ys≥0, yt≥0} is the cone over [0,1], each wC is the cone over w⋅[0,1]. Hence the chambers are exactly the cones over the unit intervals [k,k+1].

2.2F4step 1.2given

By step 1.2 the group W is infinite, so [F4] gives 0∉U∘.

2.3F1step 1.2algebra

By [F1], ρ((st)k)=I+kN on P gives ρ((st)k)es=es+k(2es+2et)=(1+2k)es+2ket, and these are pairwise distinct roots for k∈Z because their es-coefficients 1+2k are distinct; hence Φ is infinite. If ℓ were bounded by some natural number N, then every element of W would be the value of one of the finitely many words in S of length at most N (using s−1=s), so W would be finite, contradicting step 1.2. Thus ℓ is unbounded on W and W has no longest element.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Every chamber is the cone over a unit interval of {Δ=1} by step 2.1, and every point of such a cone is λg with λ≥0 and Δ(g)=1, so Δ is nonnegative on U and positive on U∖{0}. Conversely, if Δ(f)>0 then a:=ys/Δ(f) is a real number, hence lies in some unit interval [k,k+1], and then f=Δ(f)(a,1−a) lies in the cone over [k,k+1], which is a chamber; and 0∈C⊆U. Therefore U={f:Δ(f)>0}∪{0}, so the nonzero points of {Δ=0} lie outside U and U≠V∗.

3.2F3step 2.1algebra

The relative interior of the chamber which is the cone over [k,k+1] is the open cone over (k,k+1), which is the open chamber wC∘ for the corresponding w; by [F3] these are pairwise disjoint.

3.3step 2.1algebra

If wC=−C for some w, then −C⊆{Δ≥0} because every chamber is contained in {Δ≥0} by step 2.1; but −C contains −(v) for v∈C∘, and Δ(−v)=−Δ(v)<0 since Δ(v)>0 for v∈C∘ (C∘ is the open quadrant and v≠0). This contradiction shows that no chamber equals −C.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

The map f↦f/Δ(f) is well defined on U∖{0} by step 3.1, has values in {Δ=1}, is invariant under positive scaling and separates distinct positive rays: if f/Δ(f)=g/Δ(g) then f=(Δ(f)/Δ(g))g with positive factor, and conversely positive multiples have the same image; it is surjective onto {Δ=1} because Δ(g)=1 gives g=g/Δ(g) with g∈U by step 3.1. By step 2.1 it carries the chambers onto the unit intervals [k,k+1]. The subdivision is infinite because the intervals are pairwise distinct, and no finite union of chambers covers U: a finite union of cones over [k1,k1+1],…,[kn,kn+1] contains no point f with Δ(f)=1 and ys-coordinate a>max⁡iki+1, while such points of {Δ=1}⊆U exist. Hence this chamber system is not a finite sphere; the contractible comparison complex (the Davis complex) belongs to the later page named in the statement and is not used here.

Remarks

  • Consistency with the finite-negativity criterion. For a nonzero f with Δ(f)=0, one has yt=−ys and ys≠0. By the matrix in [F1], the roots αk:=ρ((st)k)es=(1+2k)es+2ket and βk:=ρ((st)−k)et=2kes+(1+2k)et are positive for every integer k≥0, and each family is pairwise distinct. Their values are f(αk)=ys and f(βk)=−ys. Thus the first family supplies infinitely many negative values when ys<0, and the second does so when ys>0. Hence f has infinitely many negative positive roots, in agreement with The finite-negativity criterion, the reduction step, and convexity of the Tits cone (1), which gives f∉U.

  • The negative comparison is the whole of it. This item proves that the finiteness hypothesis in the spherical tiling and triangulation cannot be dropped, and it stops there: it asserts nothing about a contractible complex on which W acts, and it declares no dependency on the later page that supplies one.

Sources