How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Real Forms and Reflection Geometry
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Coxeter Presentations, Exchange, and Reduced Word Theorems
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Reflections require a form and a nonisotropic normal, not an unstated Euclidean structure. This page begins with finite-dimensional real vector spaces and distinguishes positive-definite, indefinite and degenerate forms before assigning any chamber interpretation.
The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps fixes a finite set , a Coxeter matrix and the real vector space , and defines the Coxeter form on the basis by and (and when ), together with its radical, its -preserving linear maps and the reflection for . Neither positive definiteness nor nondegeneracy is presumed, and is left undefined for null . Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order proves that this form is well defined, that every is a -preserving linear involution with fixed hyperplane , and computes the rank-two plane : the Gram matrix is positive definite for finite (the square-sum identity ) and positive semidefinite with radical for ; the product has determinant , exact order for finite (trace ) and is unipotent of infinite order for .
The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone names the canonical reflection homomorphism with through the universal property of the presented Coxeter group, together with the roots , the reflections and the positive and negative cones; Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections verifies the relators, proves existence and uniqueness of , shows that every root has -norm and that . Positivity, faithfulness, discreteness and nondegeneracy are deliberately left to later pages.
The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes passes to the algebraic dual with the contragredient action — used even when is degenerate — and defines the closed chamber, its interior, the faces and the root hyperplanes . The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling verifies the action axioms, exhibits every face explicitly and proves the rank-two chamber structure: the finite case tiles by sectors on which acts simply transitively, and in the infinite case the chambers have pairwise disjoint interiors with union — the closed half-plane with the nonzero points of its boundary line removed — and wall traces on exactly the integers. All six items are choice-free. Their worked examples are collected on real-forms-and-reflection-geometry-examples.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
Definition
Let be a finite set and let be a Coxeter matrix on , so that and for (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups).
(1) The space and its distinguished functions. Let be the real vector space of all functions , with pointwise operations (The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case ); it is a vector space over the ordered field (The reals form a totally ordered field). Write for the value of at and put , for .
(2) The Coxeter form. For finite put (Sine and cosine defined by their real power series, Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine) and for put ; then and . The Coxeter form is the unique symmetric bilinear form on with for all ; in particular and for finite , while when (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms, Bilinear forms on correspond linearly and bijectively to linear maps ). No positive definiteness, definiteness or nondegeneracy of is presumed: may be nonzero (The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space), and the form may be indefinite (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form). A linear map is -preserving when for all .
(3) Reflections. For with define the reflection with normal by The definition asserts neither that is linear or an involution nor that is a hyperplane; these are proved in Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order ↗. When the symbol is not defined.
Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order
Statement
Let , , , and be as in The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps.
(1) Well-definedness of . The functions () form a basis of , and there is exactly one symmetric bilinear form on with for finite and for ; it satisfies for all .
(2) Reflection identities. Let with . Then is linear, , , for every with , and for all . Moreover is a linear subspace of dimension (a hyperplane of , in the codimension-one sense) and is fixed pointwise by .
(3) The rank-two plane. Let in , put and as in The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps (so when ). Then:
(i) has Gram matrix ; for finite it is positive definite, with ; for it is positive semidefinite, i.e. for all , with radical .
(ii) and fix every element of pointwise; and if then .
(iii) The product has, in the ordered basis of , the matrix , of determinant .
(iv) If then , , and for . If then on for some with and ; hence for every , so has infinite order on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a finite set , a Coxeter matrix on , the real vector space , the Coxeter form and the maps defined for of The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, and, for the rank-two clauses, distinct with .
The data fixed by the Statement: and for ; is the function with and for ; and for finite , while when (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case ).
A bilinear form on is a function that is linear in each variable separately, and it is symmetric when for all (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms, The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps).
For a linear map of a finite-dimensional vector space over one has , and ; if a linear map has a nonzero value then its image is all of and its rank is (Rank-nullity: , Rank and nullity of a linear map with finite-dimensional domain, The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ).
In ordered bases the matrix of a composite is the product of the matrices of the factors, matrix powers are iterated products, and denotes the identity matrix (Coordinate columns and matrices of linear maps relative to ordered bases, , Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes).
Trigonometric values and identities: the addition formulas and ; ; if and only if , and if and only if for some ; , , , and by the defining series evaluated at (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series).
For linear subspaces: means and ; a symmetric bilinear form is positive definite when for every ; the left radical of a bilinear form is (Internal direct sum : the sum is everything and each summand meets the sum of the others only in , if and only if every is with in exactly one way; equivalently, if and only if the sum is and with forces every , Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form, The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space).
In the ordered field one has , so implies (The reals form a totally ordered field).
Proof
The functions are linearly independent: if then evaluating at gives . They span : every satisfies , since the right side is a finite sum ( is finite) whose value at any is . So is a basis of . Consequently, for all one has : expanding and in the basis and distributing with bilinearity in each variable gives that finite sum. In particular a bilinear form on is determined by the numbers .
The displayed for is linear in , because is linear and is a sum of the identity and the composite of that functional with scalar multiplication by ; also , and for every . Moreover , so ; hence . Finally, expanding with bilinearity and cancelling the equal cross terms via symmetry and , so is -preserving.
Put . By the value is nonzero, so the image of is all of and its rank is ; the kernel is a linear subspace and rank-nullity gives .
For distinct , evaluating the definition of at and with and gives , , and . Hence in the ordered basis the matrices are and , and the composite has matrix
On write . Bilinearity and the values , give . For finite one has and because and the sine zero set is ; hence whenever , so is positive definite. For one has and , which vanishes exactly when , i.e. on ; and is precisely the radical of , since and vanish for all such , while makes .
Assume and put , so . The trace of the matrix in 1.4 is by the double-angle instance of the addition formulas, and the Cayley-Hamilton identity, verified directly from the displayed entries, reads . For one has and , and for one has , so .
Assume ; then and induction on using and the product-to-sum identity gives for every : the case is , and the induction step replaces using the displayed identity. Hence because and . If and , then ; were , the matrix would be scalar, contradicting its nonzero off-diagonal entry (for the value is nonzero, since would force , that is for an integer , so and , impossible because ). So , and then forces ; with it gives (indeed writes , and follows from and , so forces even), hence , contradicting . Hence for .
Assume , so and with . Then and by direct multiplication, so the binomial theorem gives for every , while because , so for and for every . For the matrix has entry in its first column, so ; the product therefore has infinite order on .
The Coxeter form of the Statement is well defined: the prescription is a finite sum of scalar multiples of products of coordinate values, hence a function linear in each variable; it is symmetric because , which follows from and the symmetry of cosine; and it has for all . By 1.1 it is the unique symmetric bilinear form with these values, and gives .
The maps and fix pointwise, since and likewise for . If , then : the Gram matrix of has determinant , so for given the system , has a unique solution ; then satisfies , hence and , so . If then with , and positive definiteness of forces ; thus and .
Let . If , then and for by steps 1.6 and 2.1 and the case of step 1.6, while has the matrix displayed in step 1.4; on the map fixes every vector by step 2.4, so and for because its restriction to the direct summand differs from . If , then with , and for every by step 2.2, so for every and has infinite order on .
The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone
Definition
Let , , , be as in The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, let be the presented Coxeter group of Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups with its universal property, and put for (Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order).
(1) Write for the group of invertible linear maps , the unit group of the monoid of linear endomorphisms under composition (Invertible linear maps, linear isomorphisms, and inverse linear maps, The space of linear maps with pointwise addition and scalar multiplication, Identity maps and composites of linear maps are linear, The invertible elements of a monoid form a group under the restricted operation). The canonical reflection homomorphism is the group homomorphism (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism) that satisfies for every ; its existence and uniqueness are established by Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections ↗, which is this definition's recorded justifier. For and write for the image.
(2) The root system of the pair is ; its elements are the roots. The set of reflections of is ; that is the reflection and that every root is -non-isotropic are proved in Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections ↗.
(3) The positive cone is and the negative cone is (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing ).
No positivity of for fixed , no faithfulness or injectivity of , no discreteness and no nondegeneracy of is asserted by this definition.
Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections
Statement
Let , , , , , , , , be as in The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone.
(1) Relators and descent. For every one has , and for all with one has . Consequently the assignment sends every relator of the presentation to the identity, and by the universal property of Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups there is a unique group homomorphism with for all .
(2) preserves the form. For every and all , .
(3) Roots have unit norm. For every and , ; hence every root satisfies and is defined.
(4) Conjugation of reflections. Let be -preserving and let with . Then . In particular, for every and , so every acts on as the reflection in the root .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a finite set , a Coxeter matrix , the space , the Coxeter form , the reflections and the presented Coxeter group with its universal property, all as in the Statement of The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone; here for .
For with the map is linear, satisfies and for all ; and for distinct with the product satisfies (Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clauses (2) and (3)(iv)).
The Coxeter form satisfies for every , the symbol abbreviates , and a linear map is -preserving when for all (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps).
A subset of a group that is closed under the group operation and under inverses and contains a generating set equals , because is the smallest subgroup containing ; a group homomorphism satisfies and (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups, Group and abelian group, Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).
For a vector space the set of linear maps is a monoid under composition with identity , its unit group is the group of invertible linear maps, and composition is associative (The space of linear maps with pointwise addition and scalar multiplication, Identity maps and composites of linear maps are linear, The invertible elements of a monoid form a group under the restricted operation, Invertible linear maps, linear isomorphisms, and inverse linear maps, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).
Proof
For every the map is linear, -preserving and satisfies : these are the identities of [F1] for , whose hypothesis holds by [F2]. Since , the map is invertible with , so .
For all distinct with one has , directly from the exact order statement of [F1] applied to the plane spanned by and : the product acts there with exact order , so its -th power is the identity on .
Conjugation formula. Let be -preserving and let with . Then , and for every the -preservation of gives . Substituting into the definition of and writing , so .
Descent. The assignment sends the relator to by 1.1 and the relator to by 1.2; these are exactly the relators of the presented Coxeter group of Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, and the images lie in the group . So the universal property of that presentation gives a unique group homomorphism with for every .
preserves the form, and roots have unit norm. Let . Every lies in by 1.1, since . If then , using the homomorphism property of 2.1 and the -preservation of and then of , so ; and if , then , so . Thus is a subgroup containing , and since every element of is the value of a finite word in (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups), so that the images of the elements of generate , [F3] gives . In particular for all and by [F2], so every root has and the reflection is defined.
Conjugation of reflections by . Let and . By 3.1 the map is -preserving, and by 2.1; applying the conjugation formula 1.3 with and therefore gives . Since is a homomorphism, and , so Hence for every the element is the reflection in the root , as asserted.
The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes
Definition
Let , , , , , , be as in The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone, and let be the algebraic dual of (Linear functionals and the algebraic dual ).
(1) The dual action. For and define by This is the dual (contragredient) action of ; that it really is a left action by linear maps is proved in The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling ↗. The dual action is used even when is degenerate: no identification of with through is made or assumed.
(2) Chambers, faces, root hyperplanes. The closed chamber is , its interior is , and for the face is the set of functionals of vanishing exactly on . For a root the root hyperplane is , the kernel of the evaluation functional (Kernel and image of a linear map).
Neither the nonemptiness of the nor any orbit or tiling property is asserted here; existence of the faces and the exact rank-two chamber structure are proved in The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling ↗.
The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling
Statement
With the notation of The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes:
(1) The dual action is an action by linear maps. For all and one has and , and for each the map is linear.
(2) The faces are nonempty. Let be the dual basis functionals of the basis of , i.e. (The dual family associated to a Hamel basis , defined by , The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension). For the functional satisfies for and for ; hence and every face is nonempty. In particular is nonempty and .
(3) Rank two. Let in and put . Let be the algebraic dual space of the -dimensional space (Linear functionals and the algebraic dual ), with the dual basis of the basis of ; functionals on are the restrictions of functionals on . Let be the matrix subgroup generated by the two reflections. It preserves . For and define for ; this is a left action of on by linear maps, the contragredient of its restriction to . The abstract subgroup acts through its image ; no action of all of on is asserted. Writing (so for ) and coordinates on , so that and , , the dual generators act by each is an involution fixing the line pointwise, respectively , and the functional is preserved by when . Put , the rank-two root system. For the rank-two root hyperplane is .
(i) If : is a dihedral group of order , and the chambers (), where , are exactly the closed sectors cut out in by the root hyperplanes , . They have pairwise disjoint interiors, their union is all of , acts simply transitively on them, and any two distinct chambers are separated by at least one root hyperplane, i.e. there is with the two interiors in opposite open half-planes of .
(ii) If : the chambers () have pairwise disjoint interiors and their union is , that is, the closed half-plane with the nonzero points of its boundary line removed; any two distinct chambers are separated by at least one root hyperplane , and the traces are exactly the integers in the coordinate on that affine line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a finite set , a Coxeter matrix , the space , the Coxeter form , the reflections , the presented group , the canonical homomorphism with roots , and the dual action, chambers, faces and root hyperplanes on of The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes; for distinct the plane and the number .
and for all ; for the map is a linear involution preserving with and the identity on ; for this gives and , and symmetrically , ; and for finite the restriction is positive definite (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clauses (2) and (3)(i)–(iv), and Proof step 2.1). In particular, has exact order on for finite , while for its restriction is with and .
is the unique homomorphism with for , it satisfies and , every preserves , every root has -norm , and for all , , so all reflections of act as the reflections in the roots (The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone, Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections, clauses (1)–(4)).
The dual action is ; the closed chamber is , its interior is , the face of type is , and for (The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes).
For a finite-dimensional space the dual space, the dual family of a basis and its basis property are as recorded in the algebraic-dual and dual-basis items; in particular defines unique elements of the dual of (Linear functionals and the algebraic dual , The dual family associated to a Hamel basis , defined by , The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension).
consists of the functions with pointwise operations, the functions form a basis of , and for (The vector space of all functions with pointwise operations, and as the case , Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order, clause (1)).
Trigonometric facts: the addition formulas; ; if and only if , and if and only if for some ; , ; and follow from the addition formulas (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).
and is a totally ordered field, so for and the order arithmetic below is the order of (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, The reals form a totally ordered field).
Every real has an integer with (Integer part: for every real there is exactly one integer with ).
A nonzero linear map from a finite-dimensional real vector space to is onto, because any nonzero value can be scaled to any prescribed real value. Its kernel therefore has codimension one by Rank-nullity: .
Proof
The dual action is an action by linear maps. For and the formula defines an element of because a composite of linear maps is linear, and is linear because evaluation at is linear in . Moreover , since , and using and hence .
Generators on the dual plane. The formulas in [F1] show , since each map preserves and is its own inverse. Hence every and its inverse preserve . The restriction is a homomorphism into , so is well-defined on and is a left action: , and the identity acts trivially. Here and denote the actions of and respectively. The dual basis vectors satisfy and , while and ; hence in coordinates , that is The same computation with replaced by gives . Both displayed maps are involutions: applying the first twice returns , and applying the second twice returns . The first fixes the line pointwise and the second fixes pointwise, since these are exactly the vectors whose coordinate in question vanishes. For the functional one has and , so each generator preserves exactly when , i.e. when ; in that case preserves because it is generated by and .
Faces. Let and put . By the dual-basis property for and for ; hence and every face is nonempty. In particular gives , so the interior is nonempty, and gives , since a functional vanishing on the basis of is zero. For a root , makes , so some coordinate and . Thus is a nonzero linear map and is a hyperplane by [F9].
The finite rank-two model. Assume and put and . Then , and . On put and . Then , and : thus is a -orthonormal basis of and , . Since fixes pointwise and sends to , in the coordinates of the basis it is ; since is spanned by and , the map is the reflection in the line . Consequently the composite satisfies and , so in the orthonormal coordinates the rotation through , whose order is exactly .
The rank-two roots. Assume and keep the orthonormal coordinates of 1.4, in which is the rotation through . Then for every , and because and , . Moreover , and the same two formulas applied to give and at angles and . As varies over the angles are exactly the even multiples of and the angles are exactly the odd multiples, so every element of is one of the four displayed families and ; conversely contains and and is stable under (which adds to an angle) and under (which sends an angle to ), hence stable under , so . Therefore a set of exactly unit vectors, and is stable under .
The infinite case. Assume , so and by 1.2 the generators act by and and preserve . On the affine line parametrized by these maps read and , the two reflections of the line about and . Every word in the two involutions rewrites to or with , where ; their actions on this affine line are respectively and . These are pairwise distinct, so restriction to is faithful on . The interval images are and , so they are exactly for , with distinct elements giving distinct intervals. These cover the affine line by [F8] and have pairwise disjoint interiors. Since is the cone on in the half-plane and the action is linear, the chamber is the cone on the interval corresponding to ; these cones have pairwise disjoint interiors and their union is , because every point with is a positive multiple of a unique point of lying in a unit interval, while every point of a cone on a unit interval has and only has . By [F1] and the normal forms above, the roots are precisely the four families , , and for . Equivalently , since the first and fourth families cover the even and odd values of in the first pair, and the second and third do so in the second pair. On the equation is , so the two root families give wall traces and , exactly the integers. If two chamber intervals are and with , the wall whose trace is places their interiors in opposite open half-planes, because its defining linear form on has the sign of up to a fixed nonzero factor.
The rank-two walls. Assume . The map , , is an isomorphism: in the orthonormal basis of 1.4 its inverse sends to . Moreover it intertwines the two actions, since for . For one has , where : indeed vanishes exactly when . By 2.1 each is a unit vector at an angle , so is the line at angle , and the lines depend only on the pair : there are exactly of them, at angles , , equally spaced by . The chamber corresponds under to , whose boundary lines are (the line at angle ) and (the line at angle , i.e. ): so of the closed sector between these two consecutive walls, of angle , and no root hyperplane line meets because the walls are equally spaced by and contain both boundary lines.
The finite chamber tiling. Assume . Put , , and . Since and , every word in rewrites to or . The finite relation therefore gives at most elements, represented by . Their restrictions to are all distinct: the rotations are distinct by their exact order , the maps are distinct after cancellation of , and a rotation cannot equal a reflection because their determinants on are and . Thus restriction to is faithful on this matrix subgroup, , and it is the dihedral group of order . Its contragredient action on has the same distinct elements. The action maps the set of walls to itself, because for and is -stable, so it permutes the closed sectors; it maps the sector to the sectors obtained by successive rotations through and by the reflection , which realizes all of them: under , has angular interval and has interval ; their images add , giving all consecutive sectors modulo . Thus the orbit of is exactly the set of closed sectors cut out by the root hyperplanes. Since equals the number of sectors, the action on the orbit is simply transitive, and the sectors have pairwise disjoint interiors and union as the sectors of distinct lines through the origin. Finally, a sign choice for each of the wall forms defines an intersection of open half-planes. If nonempty it is convex, by linearity of those forms, and so lies in a single sector: the segment joining any two of its points meets no wall. Thus distinct sector interiors have different signs for some wall form, which supplies a root hyperplane separating their entire interiors.
Remarks
Davis, Example D.2.1(i), printed p. 442, describes the infinite-dihedral Tits cone as the closed half-plane. For the literal union of the chamber images, step 2.2 shows that every nonzero point of its boundary is absent; the closed half-plane is the closure of that union.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Michael W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (Princeton University Press; author's full institutional PDF)
- Anders Björner and Francesco Brenti, Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups (Graduate Texts in Mathematics 231, Springer 2005)
- George Lusztig, Hecke Algebras with Unequal Parameters (revised 2014 text, arXiv:math/0208154v2)