Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Short Loop Polygons and Quantitative Energy Decrease — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This companion page is a dependency leaf: its examples use only the theory of short-loop-polygons-and-quantitative-energy-decrease and that page's established prerequisite closure, and no other theory page may depend on a supplier homed here.

The examples test each construction of the theory page against explicit computations. Midpoint iteration on a small equilateral spherical triangle contracts geometrically to its centre follows the midpoint iteration on a small equilateral spherical triangle, where a side of length s contracts to arccos⁡((1+3cos⁡s)/(2+2cos⁡s)) and the iterates converge to the centre with a strict energy drop at every step. The zero-length boundary: constant tuples, collapsed edges and the degeneracy of the energy decrement at L=0 examines the zero-length boundary: constant tuples, collapsed edges and the degeneracy of the decrement function at both ends of (0,2π). Equally spaced points on a metric circle: stationary energy and the equality case shows that, for the stated mesh bound and n≥5, an equally spaced cyclic n-tuple on a metric circle of length 0<ℓ<2π rotates by ℓ/(2n) at each midpoint step while its length and energy remain stationary outside the basin, realising the equality case on a closed local geodesic. Null-homotopy versus shrinkability through short loops on S2 and on a short circle contrasts ordinary null-homotopy with shrinkability through short loops on S2 and on a short circle, where the equator is null-homotopic but not short while the full short circle is a nonshrinkable loop.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Midpoint iteration on a small equilateral spherical triangle contracts geometrically to its centre

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the cited uniform decrement. Let S2 be the round unit sphere with the metric dS(x,y)=arccos⁡(x⋅y) (Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences, Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles) and let 0<s<π/2. Let x=(x0,x1,x2) be the vertices of the equilateral spherical triangle of side s centred at the north pole; fix a uniform local radius of the page with s<l<π/2 and x∈Ph(3). Then:

(i) fx is again an equilateral triangle centred at the north pole, with side s1=arccos⁡(1+3cos⁡s2+2cos⁡s)<s, so L(fx)=3s1<3s=L(x), E(fx)=3s12<3s2=E(x) and mesh⁡(fx)=s1<s=mesh⁡(x) (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

(ii) Iterating, each fkx is equilateral with side sk given by sk+1=arccos⁡((1+3cos⁡sk)/(2+2cos⁡sk)), and sk↓0; hence x lies in the zero-limit basin Ch0(3), the iterates converge to the constant tuple at the north pole, and the drop agrees with Existence of the uniform radius, continuity of the midpoint operation, the energy drop, its equality case, and convergence of zero-limit polygons (ii) and The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (i).

(iii) The equality case Existence of the uniform radius, continuity of the midpoint operation, the energy drop, its equality case, and convergence of zero-limit polygons (iii) does not occur: E(fx)<E(x), and the deficit is strictly positive for every s>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The round unit sphere S2 with its intrinsic metric; a real s with 0<s<π/2; the equilateral triangle centred at the north pole with vertices x0,x1,x2 at pairwise distance s.

[L1]

Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences: comparison triangles and the spherical cosine rule on S2, the midpoint identity cos⁡dS(x,a)=(cos⁡dS(x,y)+cos⁡dS(x,z))/(2cos⁡(dS(y,z)/2)), and the convexity of balls of radius <π/2.

Verification

technique · explicit spherical computation
1.1L1L3L4algebra

The actual midpoint side. Represent the vertices by unit vectors u0,u1,u2 with ui⋅uj=c:=cos⁡s∈(0,1) for i≠j. The midpoint of the short arc from ui to uj is (ui+uj)/2+2c. Two adjacent such midpoints have dot product (ui+uj)⋅(uj+uk)/(2+2c)=(1+3c)/(2+2c), so their spherical distance is s1=arccos⁡((1+3c)/(2+2c)). The rotational symmetry fixes the north pole and permutes these midpoints, so the midpoint triangle is equilateral with that same centre.

2.1step 1.1L3algebra

Strict contraction. For 0<c<1, the quotient u=(1+3c)/(2+2c) satisfies u<1 and u−c=(1−c)(1+2c)/(2+2c)>0. Thus 0<s1=arccos⁡u<arccos⁡c=s by [L3].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra

The midpoint triangle is equilateral (i). The symmetry group of the equilateral triangle acts transitively on its vertices and fixes the centre N; the midpoint operation is equivariant under isometries of S2, so fx is again an equilateral triangle with centre N and side s1; hence L(fx)=3s1, E(fx)=3s12 and mesh⁡(fx)=s1, and step 2.1 gives the strict inequalities of (i).

4.1step 3.1L2L3L5algebra

The iteration contracts to zero (ii). By step 3.1 applied to each iterate, fkx is equilateral with side sk, where sk+1=arccos⁡((1+3cos⁡sk)/(2+2cos⁡sk)), and (sk) is strictly decreasing and bounded below by 0; hence it converges to some λ≥0 by A monotone sequence converges if and only if it is bounded, and continuity of the recursion ([L1], [L3]) gives c∞=(1+3c∞)/(2+2c∞) with c∞=cos⁡λ>0, so (c∞−1)(2c∞+1)=0 and c∞=1, hence λ=0. Moreover 1−cos⁡sk+1=(1−cos⁡sk)/(2+2cos⁡sk)≤(1−cos⁡sk)/2, so sin⁡(sk/2)≤2−k/2sin⁡(s0/2). Since sk≤s0<π/2, The limit of sin x divided by x at zero is one bounds u/sin⁡u near zero; away from zero its numerator is bounded and its denominator is bounded below by [L3]. Thus sk≤C2−k/2 for some C>0, establishing the geometric rate in the title. Therefore L(fkx)=3sk→0, so x∈Ch0(3) by the description of the basin [L2]. Moreover L(fkx)=3sk∈(0,2π) for every k, so the uniform decrement of [L5] applies to each iterate and gives E(fk+1x)≤E(fkx)−λ3(3sk), in agreement with the strict drop computed in step 3.1.

4.2step 3.1L2algebra

The equality case does not occur (iii). By step 3.1, E(fx)=3s12<3s2=E(x) for every s>0, so the tuple is neither constant nor equally spaced along a closed local geodesic; the deficit E(x)−E(fx) is strictly positive and the equality characterization of L2 does not apply.

5.1step 4.1L4algebra

Convergence to the constant tuple. The three vertex vectors have equal dot product with the north-pole vector N and sum to a positive multiple of N. Thus cos⁡2ρk=(1+2cos⁡sk)/3, by squaring their sum; since sk→0, ρk→0; hence the iterates converge uniformly to the constant tuple at the north pole.

6.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 4.2∎

Conclusion. Clause (i) is steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1, clause (ii) is steps 4.1 and 5.1, and clause (iii) is step 4.2: the midpoint iteration on a small equilateral spherical triangle stays equilateral, contracts the side strictly, converges to the centre and realises a strict energy drop at every step.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08Open item page →

The zero-length boundary: constant tuples, collapsed edges and the degeneracy of the energy decrement at L=0

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the cited quantitative suppliers. Let X be compact locally CAT(1) and let l, n≥3, h<l be as in Uniform local radii, cyclic small-mesh polygons, mesh, length, energy, the midpoint operation and the zero-limit basin. Then:

(i) Constant tuples. If x=(p,…,p) is constant, then mesh⁡(x)=L(x)=E(x)=0, the midpoint of every degenerate pair is p, f(x)=x, and x∈Ch0(n); the corresponding constant loop is short and shrinkable (a constant short-loop homotopy), and it is the unique zero-energy state up to the choice of p.

(ii) The decrement degenerates at L=0 and at L=2π. The function λn of The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (i) is positive on (0,2π) but has lim⁡r→0+λn(2r)=0 and lim⁡r→π−λn(2r)=0: the explicit minorant contains the factors r2/n4 and δ(η,μ) r/n with η=η(π−r) and μ=min⁡{r/(2n),η}, and η(ε)=ε/2 tends to 0 as r→π. Consequently this explicit minorant has no positive lower bound near either endpoint. Basin membership is defined by lim⁡kL(fkx)=0, equivalently by an iterate of length <l/2; it is not a test for a fixed positive one-step deficit.

(iii) Collapsed edges. If x has some but not all consecutive pairs equal (say xi=xi+1), then that edge contributes 0 to mesh, length and energy, the midpoint of the degenerate pair is xi, and the estimates of Existence of the uniform radius, continuity of the midpoint operation, the energy drop, its equality case, and convergence of zero-limit polygons (ii) and its equality analysis remain valid; if x is nonconstant, then E(x)>0 and a collapsed edge puts it in the variance case of The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space, without applying the positive-edge perturbation estimate to that tuple. If X is geodesic and L(x)<2π, deleting repeated consecutive vertices while retaining at least three entries preserves basin membership, by Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (ii).

(iv) No uniform gap at zero. The value L=0 is not excluded from the basin by the decrement argument (which is vacuous at r=0); it is the limiting value itself. This is why the basin is open in Existence of the uniform radius, continuity of the midpoint operation, the energy drop, its equality case, and convergence of zero-limit polygons (iv) and closed in The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (iii) without a uniform positive gap near L=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact locally CAT(1) space X with uniform radius l<π/2; a fixed n≥3 and h<l; the function λn of The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (i).

[L1]

Uniform local radii, cyclic small-mesh polygons, mesh, length, energy, the midpoint operation and the zero-limit basin: the definitions of mesh⁡, L, E and f, and the convention that the midpoint of a degenerate pair is its point.

[L2]

Existence of the uniform radius, continuity of the midpoint operation, the energy drop, its equality case, and convergence of zero-limit polygons: the pointwise midpoint bound, the equality analysis and the description of the basin by the limit of the iterated lengths.

[L3]

The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (i): the explicit minorant defining λn, its continuity and positivity on (0,2π).

[L7]

Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (ii): for compact geodesic locally CAT(1) X, short polygon loops lie in the basin exactly when they are shrinkable.

[L6]

The Axiom of Choice: AC enters only through the suppliers [L3], [L4] and [L7]; the evaluations of the explicit constants and the degenerate-edge conventions are choice-free.

Verification

technique · direct evaluation of the explicit constants
1.1L1L2L5algebra

Constant tuples (i). If x=(p,…,p) then every consecutive distance is 0, so mesh⁡(x)=L(x)=E(x)=0; every pair (xi,xi+1) is degenerate with midpoint p by [L1], so f(x)=x, and then L(fkx)=0 for all k, so x∈Ch0(n) by [L2]. The corresponding constant loop is short (length 0<2π) and shrinkable through constant loops, and conversely E(x)=0 forces all edges to have length 0, i.e. x to be constant.

1.2L3L5algebra

Degeneracy at zero (ii). The chosen positive minorant obeys 0<λn(2r)≤r2/(2n4), so λn(2r)→0 as r→0+. No boundedness assertion about δ near a parameter-domain endpoint is needed.

1.3L3L4L5algebra

Degeneracy at 2π (ii). As r→π−, η=(π−r)/2→0 and μ=min⁡{r/(2n),η}→0. The intrinsic separation construction gives 0<δ(η,μ)≤2(μ/4)=μ/2, since its cut chord length is nonnegative. Therefore 0<λn(2r)≤δr/(2n)≤μr/(4n)→0. This proves the claimed limit using an actual bound, rather than continuity at a point outside δ's domain.

1.4L1L2L3L4L7algebra

Collapsed edges (iii). A zero edge contributes zero to mesh, length and energy, and its midpoint is its endpoint by [L1]. If x is nonconstant, another edge is positive and E(x)>0; equality of energies cannot hold, since [L2] requires all positive-length equality edges to have the same positive length, contradicting the zero edge. When x is in the short basin, put r=L(x)/2>0 and Δ=E(x)−E(fx). The variance estimate of [L3] gives ∣ξi−2r/n∣≤nΔ; at the zero edge this forces Δ≥4r2/n4>r2/n4, so the first decrement case applies. The perturbation supplier is needed instead for degenerate face triples in the small-deficit case, where all edges are ≥r/n>0. Finally, deleting consecutive repeated vertices preserves the normalized polygonal loop; if both lists have at least three entries, X is geodesic and their common length is <2π, [L7] identifies both basin memberships with shrinkability of that same loop. Equal initial energies alone do not identify their different midpoint iterations.

2.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L2L3algebra

The basin criterion (ii), (iv). The explicit λn supplies no uniform positive decrement near either length endpoint, by steps 1.2 and 1.3. The basin's defining condition is lim⁡kL(fkx)=0, and L2 gives the equivalent eventual threshold L(fmx)<l/2. Openness follows from that strict threshold; closedness inside {L<2π} uses [L3]'s bounded iteration on positive compact length bands. Neither conclusion requires a positive lower bound for λn near zero.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 1.4L6∎

Conclusion. Clause (i) is step 1.1, clause (ii) is steps 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1, clause (iii) is step 1.4, and clause (iv) is step 2.1: the zero-length boundary is a genuine limit of the basin, the decrement function degenerates at both endpoints of (0,2π), and degenerate edges do not disturb the estimates; AC enters only through the suppliers [L3] and [L4] ([L6]).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Equally spaced points on a metric circle: stationary energy and the equality case

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the cited short-loop criterion.

Let 0<ℓ<2π and let Sℓ1=R/ℓZ be the circle of circumference ℓ with its metric dℓ (Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles, Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences (vi)). Fix n≥5, choose 0<ε<ℓ(1/4−1/n), and let x be the cyclic n-tuple of equally spaced points 0,ℓ/n,…,(n−1)ℓ/n; take the uniform radius l=ℓ/4−ε of Uniform local radii, cyclic small-mesh polygons, mesh, length, energy, the midpoint operation and the zero-limit basin so that mesh⁡(x)=ℓ/n<l, and fix h with ℓ/n≤h<l. Thus x∈Ph(n). Then:

(i) mesh⁡(x)=ℓ/n, L(x)=ℓ, E(x)=ℓ2/n, and f(x) is the equally spaced tuple shifted by ℓ/(2n); hence L(fkx)=ℓ and E(fkx)=ℓ2/n for every k, and x∉Ch0(n) (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

(ii) Every consecutive triple of x is straight, so x realizes the equality case of Existence of the uniform radius, continuity of the midpoint operation, the energy drop, its equality case, and convergence of zero-limit polygons (iii): it is the list of n equally spaced points of the closed local geodesic Sℓ1. This is the exclusion of The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (iii): the basin can contain no such tuple.

(iii) Sℓ1 is compact and locally CAT(1) but not CAT(1) (Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences (vi)), and it contains the isometrically embedded circle Sℓ1 of length ℓ<2π. The loop is a short nonshrinkable loop, in agreement with Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (iii) with m=ℓ; in particular the tuple with stationary length and energy in (i) is not contradictory, because the quantitative decrement is stated on the basin only.

(iv) For ℓ=2π the same computation gives a rotating tuple with stationary length and energy on the CAT(1) circle S2π1; stationary length and energy therefore do not detect whether the space is CAT(1), they only detect the closed local geodesic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The circle Sℓ1=R/ℓZ of circumference 0<ℓ<2π with its intrinsic metric; a fixed n≥5; the cyclic tuple x of equally spaced points jℓ/n; l=ℓ/4−ε with 0<ε<ℓ(1/4−1/n) and ℓ/n≤h<l.

[L1]

Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences (vi): the circle Sℓ1 is compact and locally CAT(1), the distance between two points is the minimum of the two arc lengths, and Sℓ1 is not CAT(1) for ℓ<2π.

[L3]

Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (iii)-(iv): the minimum m of the lengths of isometrically embedded circles, and the equivalence between X being CAT(1) and m≥2π.

[L5]

The Axiom of Choice: AC enters only through the suppliers [L2] and [L3]; the explicit circle computation is choice-free.

Verification

technique · explicit arc-midpoint computation
1.1L2L4algebra

The data of the tuple (i). Consecutive points jℓ/n and (j+1)ℓ/n are at distance ℓ/n (the shorter arc has length ℓ/n<ℓ/2, so it is the unique geodesic), so mesh⁡(x)=ℓ/n≤h and x∈Ph(n), L(x)=n⋅ℓ/n=ℓ and E(x)=n(ℓ/n)2=ℓ2/n.

2.1step 1.1L2L4algebra

The midpoint tuple is the shifted tuple (i). The arclength midpoint of the arc from jℓ/n to (j+1)ℓ/n is (j+1/2)ℓ/n, so f(x)j=(j+1/2)ℓ/n; this is the equally spaced tuple based at ℓ/(2n), i.e. a rotation of x by ℓ/(2n). The rotation is an isometry of Sℓ1, so L(fkx)=ℓ and E(fkx)=ℓ2/n for every k; in particular the iterated lengths do not tend to 0 and x∉Ch0(n).

3.1step 2.1L2algebra

Straightness and the equality case (ii). Every consecutive triple of x lies on the unique minimizing arc of length 2ℓ/n<ℓ/2 because n≥5, and its middle point is the midpoint of that arc; hence each triple is straight, which is exactly the equality condition of L2: the tuple is the list of n equally spaced points of the closed local geodesic Sℓ1. Since the basin contains no nonconstant straight equilateral tuple by The uniform energy decrement on the basin, bounded iteration, and the closedness of the basin inside the short polygon space (iii), this is consistent with step 2.1.

3.2step 2.1L1L2L3algebra

The short circle and its minimum (iii). By [L1] the circle is compact locally CAT(1), but not CAT(1). Pairs at distance <ℓ/2 have a unique shortest arc. If an isometrically embedded circle has length u, its opposite points have two distinct minimizing arcs of length u/2, so u/2≥ℓ/2. The whole circle realizes equality, proving m=ℓ. By L3 it is nonshrinkable, consistent with the basin-only decrement and the constant positive iterated energy of step 2.1.

3.3step 2.1L1L3algebra

The boundary case (iv). For ℓ=2π the same computations give mesh⁡(x)=2π/n, L(x)=2π, E(x)=4π2/n and f(x) the shifted equispaced tuple, so its length and energy are stationary while S2π1 is CAT(1); stationary length and energy therefore do not distinguish the two cases.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3L5∎

Conclusion. Clause (i) is steps 1.1 and 2.1, clause (ii) is step 3.1, clause (iii) is step 3.2 and clause (iv) is step 3.3; AC enters only through the suppliers [L2] and [L3] ([L5]).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Null-homotopy versus shrinkability through short loops on S2 and on a short circle

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the cited short-loop criterion.

(i) The two-sphere. S2 is CAT(1) (Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences (ii)) and contains no isometrically embedded circle of length <2π; hence its minimal embedded-circle length is m=2π and, by Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (iv), every loop of length <2π on S2 is shrinkable through loops of length <2π.

(ii) The equator is null-homotopic but not short. Let E be the equator (length exactly 2π). The latitude homotopy Eφ, moving E to a pole through the parallel at latitude φ∈[0,π/2], is a null-homotopy whose loops have lengths 2πcos⁡φ, all strictly less than 2π for φ>0, while L(E0)=2π. Since E itself has length 2π, it is not a short loop, and it cannot be the first member of any short-loop homotopy: shrinkability is defined only for loops of length <2π, and the constant 2π is sharp. Thus ordinary null-homotopy imposes no length bound on the intermediate loops, whereas a short-loop homotopy constrains every member, including the first.

(iii) A short nonshrinkable loop. On Sℓ1 with 0<ℓ<2π, the full circle has length ℓ<2π; it is an isometrically embedded circle, it is nonshrinkable, and it is not null-homotopic, while every loop of length <ℓ is null-homotopic and shrinkable (Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (iii), Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences (vi)). So 'short' does not imply 'null-homotopic', and a short loop is nonshrinkable exactly when its winding number is nonzero; every such loop has length at least m=ℓ.

(iv) Separation. Both examples are consistent with the criterion of Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (iv): in a compact geodesic locally CAT(1) space the existence of a short nonshrinkable loop is equivalent to the failure of CAT(1), and in that case the minimal embedded circle realizes the minimum nonshrinkable length.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The round unit sphere S2 with its intrinsic metric; the circle Sℓ1=R/ℓZ of circumference 0<ℓ<2π; the equator E⊂S2 and the latitude family Eφ.

[L1]

Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences: S2 is CAT(1), comparison triangles and the spherical cosine rule, and the properties of the round circle Sℓ1 (statement (vi)).

[L2]

Short loops, the uniform-plus-length topology, short-loop homotopies, and nonshrinkability: short loops are the loops of length <2π, shrinkability is short-loop homotopy to a constant, and the uniform-plus-length topology.

[L3]

Polygon transfer, the basin as the shrinkable class, and the short-loop criterion (iii)-(iv): every short loop of length <m is shrinkable, and for compact geodesic locally CAT(1) X the equivalence between CAT(1), m≥2π and the absence of isometrically embedded circles of length <2π.

[L6]

The Axiom of Choice: AC enters only through the supplier [L3]; the explicit latitude and arc contractions are choice-free.

Verification

technique · explicit latitude and arc contractions together with the short-loop criterion
1.1L1L3algebra

The two-sphere (i). S2 is CAT(1) by [L1], so by [L3] every isometrically embedded circle in S2 has length at least 2π, i.e. m≥2π; the equator is an isometrically embedded circle of length 2π, so m=2π, and L3 gives that every loop of length <2π is shrinkable.

1.2L1L2L4L5algebra

The latitude homotopy (ii). Parametrize the parallel by Eφ(t)=(cos⁡φcos⁡(2πt),cos⁡φsin⁡(2πt),sin⁡φ). For an angular increment u with ∣u∣≤π, dot products and the addition formulas give the spherical distance Dφ(u)=2arcsin⁡(cos⁡φsin⁡(∣u∣/2)). Its right derivative at zero is cos⁡φ, by The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine and For −1<y<1, (arcsin⁡y)′=1/1−y2 and (arccos⁡y)′=−1/1−y2. Consequently, for every ϵ>0, all sufficiently small increments satisfy (cos⁡φ−ϵ)∣u∣≤Dφ(u)≤(cos⁡φ+ϵ)∣u∣. Refining any partition and summing proves that its supremum length on an angular interval of size A is Acos⁡φ, using the metric partition definition Length in a metric target: lower semicontinuity and arc-length reparametrization. Thus L(Eφ)=2πcos⁡φ and these loops are normalized, including the constant pole. The displayed coordinates vary uniformly continuously with φ, and their lengths vary continuously. This gives the asserted null-homotopy, with short members for φ>0, while E0 has length 2π and is outside the domain of short-loop homotopy.

1.3L1L2L3L4algebraconstruct

The short circle (iii). In Sℓ1, every pair at distance <ℓ/2 has exactly one shortest arc, whereas opposite points have two distinct minimizing arcs of length ℓ/2. Any isometrically embedded circle of length u has two minimizing arcs between its opposite points, so u/2≥ℓ/2. The full circle realizes equality, proving m=ℓ. By [L3] every loop of length <ℓ is shrinkable; the full circle is nonshrinkable. For the ordinary null-homotopy assertions, lift a loop to R under t↦t mod ℓ: subdivision into arcs lying in intervals of length <ℓ/2 gives successive unique local lifts once the initial value is fixed. The endpoint displacement is kℓ for an integer k. A loop of length <ℓ has ∣k∣ℓ≤L<ℓ, so k=0 and its lift is closed; For any loop with k=0, multiplying its closed lift about its initial point by t∈[0,1] contracts it through loops of lengths tL: local lifts preserve length by the partition definition, and Euclidean scaling multiplies length by t. For a normalized loop this family is normalized and continuous in the uniform-plus-length topology, including t=0. Thus every short zero-winding loop is shrinkable. For a continuous homotopy, compact uniform continuity [L4] gives a common finite subdivision into the same local lifting charts near each parameter value; compatible local lifts therefore depend continuously on the parameter. Their endpoint displacement is a continuous integer multiple of ℓ, hence constant on the parameter interval. The full circle has k=1 and a constant loop has k=0, so the full circle is not null-homotopic. Thus every nonzero-winding short loop is nonshrinkable, has length at least ℓ, and is not null-homotopic, proving the asserted classification.

1.4L1L3algebra

Separation (iv). In a compact geodesic locally CAT(1) space the existence of a short nonshrinkable loop is equivalent to the failure of CAT(1) by L3, and when m<2π the minimum nonshrinkable length is m, realized by an isometrically embedded circle; both examples above are instances of this criterion, since S2 has m=2π and no short nonshrinkable loop, while Sℓ1 has m=ℓ<2π and the full circle as shortest nonshrinkable loop.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4L6∎

Conclusion. Clause (i) is step 1.1, clause (ii) is step 1.2, clause (iii) is step 1.3 and clause (iv) is step 1.4; AC enters only through the supplier [L3] ([L6]).

Sources