How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Checking the subreciprocal condition for the loglog bound
Example
For on , the function is subreciprocal. At we have and , and the loglog density fraction with symbolic constant is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and symbolic.
From Qid logarithmic and constant divisibility: Every nonempty finite graph is -divisive for each of and . Both functions are subreciprocal on .
Verification
For , reciprocation and the increasing logarithm show and make nonincreasing. The bound at implicit in the subreciprocity assertion [F1] gives . Thus all subreciprocal conditions hold, including positivity of .
At , , so and . Substituting in [F2] with gives exponent and fraction . The parameter remains symbolic.
Source notes
Proof/convention locator: Bucic, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour, Induced subgraph density I, 5.1 and 5.2.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bucic, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour, Induced subgraph density I (standard reference, not scraped)