Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Surface Stokes on a graph disk

Example

Let S be the graph z=x2+y2 over the closed unit disk, with upward orientation, and let F=(y/2,x/2,0). Then curlF=(0,0,1), its upward curl flux over S is π, and its induced boundary circulation is also π.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Agreement of general and classical surface Stokes: Let SR3 be a compact oriented smooth embedded surface with boundary, and let F be smooth on an open neighborhood of S. Set α=Fxdx+Fydy+Fzdz and μ=dxdydz. Then dα=ιcurlFμ,Sα=SιcurlFμ. On an oriented parametrization r(u,v) the latter integrand is (curlF)(r)(ru×rv)dudv; on a boundary curve it is F(r)rdt. On the common smooth patch scope this is the published classical Stokes theorem, using the standard Euclidean metric identification.

[F2]

Computing form integrals by finite parametrizations: Let n1, let Mn be oriented, and let ωΩcn(M). For 1im let DiRn be bounded open Jordan domains and Fi:DiM continuous and smooth up to the boundary in target coordinates: near each parameter point, a target coordinate representative extends smoothly to a Euclidean neighborhood. Suppose FiDi is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism onto an open WiM, the Wi are pairwise disjoint, and suppωiWi. Then Mω=i=1mDiFiω. An empty family is allowed when the support is empty. No nonsingularity of DFi on Di, and no M-valued extension across a genuine target boundary, is assumed.

Verification

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

The graph parametrization is r(x,y)=(x,y,x2+y2) with rx×ry=(2x,2y,1), whose last component is positive. The curl is (0,0,1), so its scalar product with this cross product is one. The surface is a smooth compact embedded disk and F is smooth on all of Euclidean space.

F1algebra
2.1

The flux is the area of the unit parameter disk. Using polar parameters it is 02π01rdrdθ=π; finite parametrizations allow their boundary degeneracy.

F2step 1.1
3.1

The induced boundary is c(t)=(cost,sint,1) with increasing t. Along it F(c)c=1/2, so circulation is 02π(1/2)dt=π. The graph orientation gives the same increasing-angle boundary orientation as its disk parametrization, so these are the two sides of Stokes with matching signs.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources