Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming choice, the lower-limit plane is first countable, separable, and ccc, but not second countable or Lindelöf

Example

Let S be the lower-limit line. Under Choice, the countable-product theorem makes S2 first countable, and the rational grid is a countable dense subset; hence S2 is separable and therefore ccc. The antidiagonal A={(x,−x):x∈R} is an uncountable closed discrete subspace, as proved in Refuted: separability is hereditary and Assuming countable choice, refuted: Lindelöfness is productive. If S2 were second countable, hereditary second countability would make the discrete space A second countable, which is impossible because every basis of a discrete space contains all its singletons. The explicit open cover in Assuming countable choice, refuted: Lindelöfness is productive shows directly that S2 is not Lindelöf.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources