Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite information-capacity supremum need not be attained

Example

Use the countable-input, binary-output, zero-cost DMC defined in Zero-cost information capacity of a countable-input finite-output DMC. For k≥1, put ϵk=1/(k+2) and specify the channel rows by W(1∣2k)=ϵk,W(1∣2k−1)=1−ϵk. The zero-cost information capacity is CI(0)=ln⁡2, but no input law attains it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The countable DMC definition, the explicit rows, and an arbitrary probability sequence (px)x≥1.

[F1]

Zero-cost information capacity of a countable-input finite-output DMC: I(p;W)=H(Y)−∑xpxH(W(⋅∣x)) and every input law is feasible at zero cost.

[F2]

Finite-simplex entropy is continuous and concave: binary entropy is continuous, concave on [0,1], and symmetric about 1/2.

[F3]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function: logarithms are natural, so information is measured in nats. The convention 0ln⁡0=0 is supplied by [F1] and [F2].

Verification

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Write qx=W(1∣x)∈(0,1) and r=∑xpxqx. There is some x0 with px0>0, so r≥px0qx0>0 and 1−r≥px0(1−qx0)>0. The output entropy is h2(r)≤h2(1/2)=ln⁡2: concavity and symmetry in [F2] give h2(1/2)≥12h2(r)+12h2(1−r)=h2(r). Every row has entropy h2(qx)>0, and at least one term has positive weight, so ∑xpxh2(qx)>0. By [F1], I(p;W)=h2(r)−∑xpxh2(qx)<ln⁡2 for every input law.

1.2F1F2F3givenalgebra

For each k, choose the law assigning probability 1/2 to 2k and 1/2 to 2k−1. Its output is uniform because the two row probabilities sum to one, while its conditional entropy is h2(ϵk) by symmetry. Hence its mutual information is ln⁡2−h2(ϵk). Since ϵk↓0 and binary entropy is continuous with h2(0)=0 by [F2]–[F3], these values tend to ln⁡2.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Step 1.1 bounds every input law strictly below ln⁡2, while step 1.2 gives a sequence of feasible values tending to ln⁡2. Therefore the supremum is finite and equals ln⁡2, but no input law attains it.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources