Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-simplex entropy is continuous and concave

Statement

For a finite nonempty alphabet of size m, let H(p):=−∑i=1mpiln⁡pi,0ln⁡0:=0, on the probability simplex Δm={p∈[0,1]m:∑ipi=1}. Then H is continuous and concave on Δm, with 0≤H(p)≤ln⁡m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer m≥1 and the finite probability simplex Δm.

[F1]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function: ln⁡ is the natural logarithm on (0,∞).

[F2]

The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power: ln⁡s/s→0 as s→+∞.

[F4]

A twice-differentiable function on an open interval is convex if and only if its second derivative is nonnegative: a twice-differentiable function with nonpositive second derivative on an interval is concave there, by applying the nonnegative-second-derivative criterion to its negative.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Define h(t)=−tln⁡t for 0<t≤1 and h(0)=0. With s=1/t, ∣tln⁡t∣=ln⁡(s)/s→0 as t↓0 by [F1] and [F2]; hence h is continuous on [0,1].

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

On (0,1), [F3] gives h′′(t)=−1/t<0, so [F4] makes h concave there. For u,v∈[0,1] and 0<ϵ<1, replace each endpoint by uϵ=(1−ϵ)u+ϵ/2 and vϵ=(1−ϵ)v+ϵ/2. Concavity on (0,1) applies to these interior points; taking ϵ↓0 and using step 1.1 gives the concavity inequality on the closed interval.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

For p,q∈Δm and 0≤θ≤1, apply the concavity inequality for h to each coordinate θpi+(1−θ)qi. Summing the m inequalities gives H(θp+(1−θ)q)≥θH(p)+(1−θ)H(q). Continuity of H follows from continuity of the finite sum of the coordinate functions h.

4.1F1step 3.1givenalgebracases∎

Each summand −piln⁡pi is nonnegative because 0≤pi≤1, so H(p)≥0. The average of the m! coordinate permutations of p is the uniform vector u=(1/m,…,1/m), and each permutation has entropy H(p). Concavity from step 3.1, iterated over this finite average, gives H(u)≥H(p). Since H(u)=ln⁡m, the claimed upper bound follows, including m=1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources