Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A verified weak-order contract for the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process

Example

Work on a complete filtered probability space whose filtration is right-continuous and contains all P-null subsets of F in F0. Let W be an adapted standard one-dimensional Brownian motion whose increments after time s are independent of Fs. On [0,1], take dXt=−Xt dt+dWt with X0=0 and bounded Lipschitz payoff φ(x)=cos⁡x. For 0≤t≤1, put r(t)=et−1 and u(t,x)=exp⁡ ⁣(−1−r(t)24)cos⁡(r(t)x). This value function satisfies the backward equation, the mixed derivative growth requirement with q=2, and the moment threshold p≥12. Thus the conditional weak theorem applies and gives Euler weak error O(h).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the complete usual filtered Brownian setup above; T=1; the F0-measurable initial value X0=0; the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck SDE and payoff displayed in the Example; and Euler step size 0<h≤1 with 1/h∈N.

[F1]

For a one-dimensional continuous Brownian Itô process and F∈C1,2, Itô's formula has drift Ft+bFx+12σ2Fxx and stochastic term σFx dW. One-dimensional Ito formula

[F2]

An Itô integral with deterministic h∈L2[0,T] has centered normal law N(0,∫0Th(s)2ds). Deterministic Ito integrals are Gaussian

[F3]

A N(m,v) variable has characteristic function t↦exp⁡(imt−vt2/2). Characteristic function of a normal law

[F4]

The Euler interpolation on a grid interval is Yt=Yk+b(tk,Yk)(t−tk)+σ(tk,Yk)(Wt−Wtk). Euler–Maruyama step process and continuous interpolation

[F5]

Under the Euler coefficient and initial-moment hypotheses, for every finite p≥2 the step and continuous interpolation have uniformly bounded pointwise pth moments. Euler–Maruyama uniform moments and interpolation increments

[F6]

For a scalar standard normal Z, E∣Z∣12=11!!<∞ by the Gaussian even-moment lemma at m=6. The normal scaling convention gives N(0,v) as the law of vZ, including v=0. Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments Standard normal and normal laws

[F7]

If the bounded test payoff's backward value function has the stated mixed derivatives and p≥2q+8 moments, the weak Euler error is at most Ch. Euler–Maruyama weak order one under backward regularity

[A1]

AC is included because the Brownian, deterministic-integral Gaussian, normal-characteristic-function and normal-moment suppliers in [F1]–[F3], [F6] adopt it. The Axiom of Choice

Verification

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement or Example and the facts above.

1.1A1F1F2given

Apply [F1] to etXt. The drift terms cancel, so Xt=∫0te−(t−s)dWs. For a solution started at (t,x), the same calculation gives X1t,x=r(t)x+∫t1e−(1−s)dWs. By [F2], the last integral is N(0,(1−r(t)2)/2).

1.2givenalgebra

Since r′=r and A(t):=e−(1−r(t)2)/4 satisfies A′/A=r2/2, direct differentiation gives ut=A(r22cos⁡(rx)−rxsin⁡(rx)),ux=−Arsin⁡(rx),uxx=−Ar2cos⁡(rx). For the generator L=−x∂x+12∂xx, these formulas imply (∂t+L)u=0. Every mixed derivative ∂tj∂xku with j≤2, k≤4 is a finite sum of bounded smooth coefficient functions times xasin⁡(rx) or xacos⁡(rx) with a≤2; hence it is bounded by C(1+∣x∣2). The backward contract holds with q=2.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

By [F3], for that normal variable Z, EeiZ=e−(1−r2)/4. Taking the real part after multiplying by eirx gives Ecos⁡(X1t,x)=e−(1−r(t)2)/4cos⁡(r(t)x)=u(t,x). Thus u is the stated backward value function and u(1,x)=cos⁡x.

2.2F2F5F6givenstep 1.1

The exact process is centered normal at each time with variance (1−e−2t)/2≤1/2 by [F2], so [F6] at order 12 gives E∣Xt∣12=11!!{(1−e−2t)/2}6≤11!!/64 uniformly in t∈[0,1], including t=0. For the Euler process, b(x)=−x is globally Lipschitz with linear growth, σ(x)=1 is globally Lipschitz with linear growth, the time modulus is zero, and X0=0 has every moment. Applying [F5] at p=12 therefore gives uniform pointwise 12th moments for Yh and Yˉh. The threshold is p=12=2q+8.

3.1A1F4F7step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2∎

The payoff is bounded and 1-Lipschitz. By [F4], the interpolation agrees with the Euler recursion at T, so the conclusion of [F7] applies to YNh. Steps 2.1–2.2 verify its backward regularity and moment premises, giving ∣Ecos⁡(X1)−Ecos⁡(YNh)∣≤Ch. AC is inherited through [A1].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.