Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The energy-gradient mesh force matches the differentiated mesh energy

Example

Fix α>0 and take the unit cubic cell, q1=1 at x1=(1/8,1/8,1/8) and q2=−1 at x2=(5/8,1/8,1/8), a 4×4×4 mesh, order P=3, and retained modes K={(1,0,0),(−1,0,0)}. The sources are neutral and lie off mesh knots. The mesh force from the energy-gradient gather is the negative gradient of the finite mesh reciprocal energy; the optional self correction has the displayed differentiated force. The theorem's deterministic bound applies.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, α>0; the dipole configuration, M1=M2=M3=4, P=3, the displayed signed modes, and the unitary mesh assignment.

[A1]

The Ewald reciprocal error theorem carries Countable Choice from the periodic Gaussian construction (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The DFT-deconvolved spread coefficient obeys zk=∑iqibk(ti) with the stated normalization (Exact three-dimensional spline assignment aliases and FFT normalization).

[F2]

The mesh energy is 12∑k∈Kck∣zk∣2, and its declared force is the real-part gather; the corrected energy subtracts CM (Periodic cardinal-spline assignment and unitary mesh transform).

[F3]

For P≥3 the mesh force is the negative energy gradient; the self-corrected force and deterministic energy/force bounds are as stated in the reciprocal PME theorem (Deterministic reciprocal particle-mesh Ewald potential, energy, and force bounds).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The two positions are distinct and neutral. Each coordinate multiplied by Mr=4 is either 1/2 or 5/2, hence no coordinate is an integer and both particles are off assignment knots. The mode set is symmetric, injective modulo (4,4,4), nonzero, and satisfies ∣kr∣<2. Since sinc⁡(π/4)≠0, the required window denominators are nonzero.

1.2F1F2algebra

By [F1], zk=q1bk(t1)+q2bk(t2). With P=3, the factors bk are differentiable. The chain rule gives ∇xizk=qi∇xbk(ti). Therefore ∇xi(12ck∣zk∣2)=qickRe⁡(zk‾∇xbk(ti)). Summing over k∈K and negating yields exactly the stated energy-gradient force.

2.1F2step 1.2algebra

Differentiating CM=12∑jqj2∑kck(∣bk(tj)∣2−1) with respect to xi gives ∇xiCM=qi2∑kckRe⁡(bk(ti)‾∇xbk(ti)). Hence −∇xi(EM−CM)=−qi∑kckRe⁡(zk−qibk(ti)‾∇xbk(ti)), the corrected force formula.

3.1A1F3step 2.1∎

Since P=3, this instance has classical derivatives at all positions. Applying [F3] to the same admissible data gives the deterministic retained-mode error certificate, including the corrected bound when the correction is selected. A spectral differentiation rule is a different force choice and does not inherit this energy-gradient identity; at P=2 knots the assignment definition supplies a branch value but no classical-gradient claim.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.