How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under choice and dependent choice, a finite subordinate partition of unity for a two-set cover of a compact interval
Example
On , take the open-in-the-subspace cover and . Define Then and are continuous, nonnegative, and sum to one. Their supports are contained respectively in and , so they are a finite subordinate partition of unity.
The explicit pair is an instance of the existence theorem Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space admits a finite subordinate partition of unity, under its stated Choice and Dependent Choice hypotheses.
Depends on
- Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space admits a finite subordinate partition of unity
- Locally finite partitions of unity and subordination to an open cover
- Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Robbin, Partitions of Unity (standard reference, not scraped)