How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A locally finite hat-function partition of unity on subordinate to overlapping intervals
Example
For , let and . The functions are continuous, take values in , and have support . They are subordinate to the open cover of .
If , the only possibly nonzero functions are and , and Thus is a locally finite partition of unity subordinate to . The support intervals show local finiteness directly: every bounded set meets only finitely many support intervals.
Depends on
- Locally finite partitions of unity and subordination to an open cover
- Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Robbin, Partitions of Unity (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Datchev, Iterated interpolation and a partition of unity (Purdue University) (standard reference, not scraped)