How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First weight layers of the basic affine sl2 character
Example
For the basic level-one module of untwisted affine , with and , The notation records relative loop degree; a change in the complementary value of cancels under normalization. The displayed coefficients are Laurent polynomials, and the remainder has degree at least three in the formal completion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The normalized loop realization with , , and . Fix the basic dominant weight by its simple-coroot labels and , with an arbitrary complementary Cartan value.
Weyl Kac character formula gives the normalized numerator divided by the positive-root product.
Kac moody integral and dominant integral weights permits the supplied labels and an arbitrary complementary value. Affine central coroot from the transpose null ray identifies the central coroot here as ; hence the supplied labels give and level one.
Roots of an untwisted affine Lie algebra gives real roots of multiplicity one and imaginary roots of multiplicity one here.
Affine Weyl group is a coroot lattice semidirect product gives the unique forms and and displays the full translation formula in its Statement.
Verification
Put . Then and , by F2 and in F1. F4's translation formula, with and , gives Translations have sign plus, because and powers have even sign; the second family has sign minus. Thus the normalized alternant in F1 is . Only and the degree-two terms from in the first family and in the second contribute below degree three. Indeed both quadratic expressions are at least four for the other nonzero choices. Hence .
By F3 the product is . Put . The triple is and the triple is ; all later triples begin at degree three or more. Thus , with zero coefficient at degree two inside the parentheses.
Polynomial division gives . By step 1.1, . By step 1.2, the inverse of through degree two is . Consequently F1 gives . Direct multiplication gives and , proving the statement. Cancellation of is valid in the downward completion by its geometric inverse; division never lowers degree. At each fixed degree the numerator has finitely many terms by the quadratic bounds and the denominator has finitely many relevant positive-degree factors. This also justifies every displayed truncation without an analytic identity or AC.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kleshchev, Sections 6.4 and 11.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Perrin, Chapter 12 (standard reference, not scraped)