How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The five-cycle is -avoiding and shows the KST problem is not just a complete-bipartite construction
Example
The cycle contains no ordinary , although itself is not bipartite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.
For , has the consecutive edges and the closing edge (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
The complete bipartite graph has exactly all edges joining a vertex of to a vertex of (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
Verification
Label the cycle vertices modulo . Two adjacent vertices have no common neighbour, and two nonadjacent vertices have exactly one common neighbour. Thus no pair has the two common neighbours required to form a .
Therefore is -free. Its odd cycle is also a reminder that the host graphs in the ordinary KST problem need not themselves be bipartite.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 7 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.