How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every triangle-free graph is bipartite
False Statement
Every triangle-free graph is bipartite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and notation of the statement above.
For , has the consecutive edges and the closing edge (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
A finite simple graph is bipartite if and only if it contains no odd cycle (A finite graph is bipartite if and only if it has no odd cycle).
Refutation
The only cycle in using three edges would require a chord, and has only its five consecutive edges. Hence is triangle-free.
The graph is itself an odd cycle, so the cited equivalence says it is not bipartite.
Thus satisfies the premise and fails the conclusion, refuting the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yufei Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics (standard reference, not scraped)