How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A fundamental cycle and a fundamental cut in a fixed spanning tree
Statement
Let have vertices and edges . For the spanning tree with edges , the edge has fundamental cycle . The edge has fundamental cut .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graph and spanning subgraph above.
An outside edge and its unique tree path form the fundamental cycle (Every edge outside a spanning tree determines a unique fundamental cycle).
Deleting a tree edge partitions the tree into two sides, whose crossing edges form the fundamental cut (Every edge of a spanning tree determines a fundamental cut, and every edge crossing it restores a spanning tree).
A connected acyclic spanning subgraph is a spanning tree (Spanning trees of a graph).
Verification
The graph is the path , so it is a spanning tree. Its unique - path together with is the stated -cycle.
Deleting leaves vertex sides and . Exactly cross between them in .
Hence the displayed cycle and cut are the required fundamental objects.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 15 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reinhard Diestel, Graph Theory, Preview Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)