How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
by direct Prüfer enumeration and Cayley's formula
Statement
The complete graph has spanning trees.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: on the label set .
Its spanning trees correspond bijectively to words of length on (Prüfer encoding and decoding are inverse bijections between labelled trees on vertices and words of length on their labels).
Cayley's formula gives (Cayley's formula: for , with and ).
counts spanning trees (The spanning-tree number ).
Verification
There are choices for each of the two positions of a Prüfer word, hence words and therefore spanning trees.
Independently, Cayley's formula gives , agreeing with the enumeration.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- ISI Bangalore discrete mathematics notes, Trees and Cayley’s theorem (standard reference, not scraped)