How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
for every
Statement
For every , the cycle graph has exactly spanning trees.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and the cycle graph .
has edges and deleting an arbitrary edge gives the path (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
A spanning tree on vertices has edges (Equivalent characterisations of a nonempty tree by unique paths, edge count, minimal connectivity and maximal acyclicity).
counts spanning trees (The spanning-tree number , Spanning trees of a graph).
Verification
Deleting any one edge of gives a connected acyclic spanning graph, hence a spanning tree. The choices yield distinct trees.
Conversely, every spanning tree uses of the cycle edges, so it is obtained by deleting exactly one edge.
Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 35 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reinhard Diestel, Graph Theory, Preview Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)