Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Descent of the two nontrivial characters of C₃

Example

Let F=Q, let E=Q(ζ) where ζ2+ζ+1=0, and let C3=g:g3=1. Multiplication by ζ on the rational space S=E has matrix M=(0111) in the basis (1,ζ). This rational representation is simple. Its scalar extension is the sum of the two one-dimensional representations gζ and gζ2, each with multiplicity one. Their Galois orbit has size two. The rational character takes values 2,1,1 on 1,g,g2. The corresponding rational central idempotent is e=(2gg2)/3, and Q[C3]eE.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Simple modules over a semisimple algebra correspond to Galois orbits after splitting base change, with one common positive multiplicity: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.

[F2]

The trace of an endomorphism is the trace of its matrix in any basis: The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space.

[F3]

The group algebra has the group basis, with multiplication [g][h]=[gh]: The group ring R[G] is a unital R-algebra with basis G, and each gG is a unit of R[G].

Verification

Given: p(X)=X2+X+1, E=Q(ζ), and the displayed matrix M.

1.1

A rational root r of p would satisfy (r+1/2)2+3/4=0, impossible in the ordered field Q. A reducible quadratic over a field has a linear factor and thus a root, so p is irreducible and (1,ζ) is a rational basis of E. We have ζ3=1 and ζ1; the two roots are ζ,ζ2, and they are distinct since equality would force ζ=1. Both lie in E. An embedding of this quadratic field is determined by a root, so the identity and ζζ2 are its two automorphisms. Equivalently it is a finite normal separable extension, hence Galois, with this two-element group.

givenalgebra
2.1

Multiplication sends 1ζ and ζ1ζ, giving M. Direct multiplication gives M2=(1110), M2+M+I=0 and M3=I. Thus it defines a C3-action. For 0xS, the vectors x,ζx are rationally independent, because (a+bζ)x=0 in the field implies a=b=0. Any nonzero invariant rational subspace contains such x and ζx, and hence equals S. This proves simplicity.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

Put t=1+g+g2. Since every group element occurs three times in its square, t2=3t. Thus e=1t/3 is central and e2=e. Also te=0, whence e+ge+g2e=0. The two coefficient vectors e=(2gg2)/3 and ge=(1+2gg2)/3 are independent: ae+bge=0 gives 2ab=a+2b=0, so a=b=0. They span the ideal by the relation just found. Evaluation gζ sends e1 and geζ, so restricts to an algebra isomorphism Q[C3]eE, preserving the block unit. The full evaluation map has kernel Qt: if a+bζ+cζ2=0, then (ac)+(bc)ζ=0, so a=b=c.

F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

For either λ=ζ or ζ2, set vλ=(1,λ)T. Then Mvλ=(λ,1+λ)T=λvλ. The determinant of (vζ,vζ2) is ζζ20, so these form an E-basis of EQS. Consequently both eigenline modules occur exactly once. Conjugating coefficients interchanges the two eigenvectors and their distinct eigenvalues; the lines give nonisomorphic one-dimensional modules since an intertwiner between them would force ζ=ζ2.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

To check the splitting hypothesis for the whole algebra, evaluation at 1,ζ,ζ2 gives E[C3]E3. Its inverse sends the λth coordinate vector to λ(g), where λ(X)=μλ(Xμ)/(λμ) and the product ranges over the other two roots. All denominators are nonzero, and λ(μ)=δλμ proves the inverse identities on evaluations; a degree at most two polynomial vanishing at three distinct roots is zero, by successive division by Xμ. Thus the algebra is split. The characteristic-zero specialization of F1 now identifies the orbit in step 3.1 with the simple rational module in step 2.1, with multiplicity 1 as computed.

F3F1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Finally tr(I)=2, tr(M)=1 and tr(M2)=1. On either eigenline the traces are its scalar values; adding gives ζ+ζ2=1 at g and ζ2+ζ4=1 at g2. This checks the character and the identity value directly. [F2, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1, algebra] QED

Remarks

This is the quadratic cyclotomic specialization of Zheng, Example 3.8.2, p.133, and Wiese, Corollary 2.2.12, p.30. Matrices, eigenvectors and the rational block identification are computed above.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources