Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.

Galois Orbits and Descent of Simple Finite-Group Modules: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The cyclic group of order three illustrates a two-element Galois orbit with multiplicity one: a rational matrix diagonalizes over the quadratic cyclotomic field. The quaternion group illustrates a singleton orbit with multiplicity two: a rational division block becomes a full matrix algebra over Q(i).

Explicit bases, eigenvectors, idempotents, matrix inverses, column decompositions and traces verify both examples. A rational two-by-two matrix obstruction then shows why a Galois-stable character need not have an individual rational model. These examples compute the relevant multiplicities directly, without assuming later Schur-index theory.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Descent of the two nontrivial characters of C₃

Example

Let F=Q, let E=Q(ζ) where ζ2+ζ+1=0, and let C3=g:g3=1. Multiplication by ζ on the rational space S=E has matrix M=(0111) in the basis (1,ζ). This rational representation is simple. Its scalar extension is the sum of the two one-dimensional representations gζ and gζ2, each with multiplicity one. Their Galois orbit has size two. The rational character takes values 2,1,1 on 1,g,g2. The corresponding rational central idempotent is e=(2gg2)/3, and Q[C3]eE.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Simple modules over a semisimple algebra correspond to Galois orbits after splitting base change, with one common positive multiplicity: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.

[F2]

The trace of an endomorphism is the trace of its matrix in any basis: The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space.

[F3]

The group algebra has the group basis, with multiplication [g][h]=[gh]: The group ring R[G] is a unital R-algebra with basis G, and each gG is a unit of R[G].

Verification

Given: p(X)=X2+X+1, E=Q(ζ), and the displayed matrix M.

1.1

A rational root r of p would satisfy (r+1/2)2+3/4=0, impossible in the ordered field Q. A reducible quadratic over a field has a linear factor and thus a root, so p is irreducible and (1,ζ) is a rational basis of E. We have ζ3=1 and ζ1; the two roots are ζ,ζ2, and they are distinct since equality would force ζ=1. Both lie in E. An embedding of this quadratic field is determined by a root, so the identity and ζζ2 are its two automorphisms. Equivalently it is a finite normal separable extension, hence Galois, with this two-element group.

givenalgebra
2.1

Multiplication sends 1ζ and ζ1ζ, giving M. Direct multiplication gives M2=(1110), M2+M+I=0 and M3=I. Thus it defines a C3-action. For 0xS, the vectors x,ζx are rationally independent, because (a+bζ)x=0 in the field implies a=b=0. Any nonzero invariant rational subspace contains such x and ζx, and hence equals S. This proves simplicity.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

Put t=1+g+g2. Since every group element occurs three times in its square, t2=3t. Thus e=1t/3 is central and e2=e. Also te=0, whence e+ge+g2e=0. The two coefficient vectors e=(2gg2)/3 and ge=(1+2gg2)/3 are independent: ae+bge=0 gives 2ab=a+2b=0, so a=b=0. They span the ideal by the relation just found. Evaluation gζ sends e1 and geζ, so restricts to an algebra isomorphism Q[C3]eE, preserving the block unit. The full evaluation map has kernel Qt: if a+bζ+cζ2=0, then (ac)+(bc)ζ=0, so a=b=c.

F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

For either λ=ζ or ζ2, set vλ=(1,λ)T. Then Mvλ=(λ,1+λ)T=λvλ. The determinant of (vζ,vζ2) is ζζ20, so these form an E-basis of EQS. Consequently both eigenline modules occur exactly once. Conjugating coefficients interchanges the two eigenvectors and their distinct eigenvalues; the lines give nonisomorphic one-dimensional modules since an intertwiner between them would force ζ=ζ2.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

To check the splitting hypothesis for the whole algebra, evaluation at 1,ζ,ζ2 gives E[C3]E3. Its inverse sends the λth coordinate vector to λ(g), where λ(X)=μλ(Xμ)/(λμ) and the product ranges over the other two roots. All denominators are nonzero, and λ(μ)=δλμ proves the inverse identities on evaluations; a degree at most two polynomial vanishing at three distinct roots is zero, by successive division by Xμ. Thus the algebra is split. The characteristic-zero specialization of F1 now identifies the orbit in step 3.1 with the simple rational module in step 2.1, with multiplicity 1 as computed.

F3F1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Finally tr(I)=2, tr(M)=1 and tr(M2)=1. On either eigenline the traces are its scalar values; adding gives ζ+ζ2=1 at g and ζ2+ζ4=1 at g2. This checks the character and the identity value directly. [F2, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1, algebra] QED

Remarks

This is the quadratic cyclotomic specialization of Zheng, Example 3.8.2, p.133, and Wiese, Corollary 2.2.12, p.30. Matrices, eigenvectors and the rational block identification are computed above.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The rational simple quaternion block

Example

Write the quaternion group as Q8={1,z,u,zu,v,zv,uv,zuv}, where z is the group element 1, z2=1, u2=v2=z and vu=zuv. The central idempotent e=(1z)/2 in Q[Q8] cuts out the four-dimensional division algebra D=Q[Q8]e(1,1)Q. Its unique simple left module is D itself. For E=Q(i), EQDM2(E), and its left regular module is WW, where W=E2 is simple of degree two. The character of W has values 2,2,0,0,0 on the classes {1},{z},{u,zu},{v,zv},{uv,zuv}. Its Galois orbit is a singleton but its descent multiplicity is two. In fact E splits the entire group algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The orbit classification gives the common scalar-extension multiplicity under the semisimple and splitting hypotheses: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.

[F2]

A matrix-ring factor over a division ring has one simple left-module class, its column module: Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings.

[F3]

Trace is the sum of the diagonal entries of a representing matrix: The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space.

[F4]

The quaternion group is the set of eight signed basis quaternions, with multiplication inherited from the quaternion algebra: The quaternion group Q8={±1,±i,±j,±k} inside the nonzero quaternions.

[F5]

These elements form a group of order eight, and z=1 has order two: Q8 is a subgroup of H× with eight elements, and 1 is its only element of order 2.

[F6]

The group algebra has the group basis, with multiplication [g][h]=[gh]: The group ring R[G] is a unital R-algebra with basis G, and each gG is a unit of R[G].

Verification

Given: Q8 as in F4–F5, renamed with generators u,v, and E=Q(i) where i2=1.

1.1

The quaternion multiplication gives z central, u2=v2=z, and vu=zuv. Thus e2=(12z+z2)/4=e and ze=e. The four elements e,ue,ve,uve span D, since (zh)e=he for h=1,u,v,uv. They are rationally independent: he=(hzh)/2 has its two nonzero coefficients on one of four disjoint pairs of the eight group-basis elements. Hence they form a basis. Write x=ue, y=ve, w=uve; then x2=y2=w2=e, xy=w=yx, yw=x=wy, and wx=y=xw.

F6F4F5algebra
2.1

For q=ae+bx+cy+dw, put q=aebxcydw. Using the multiplication table, all mixed terms cancel and qq=qq=(a2+b2+c2+d2)e. For rational coefficients this sum is positive when q0. Thus q1=q/(a2+b2+c2+d2) exists on both sides, and D is a division algebra. Every nonzero left ideal contains an invertible element and hence e, so its left regular module is simple. F2 for a single 1×1 factor says this is its unique simple class. The zero quaternion needs no inverse; the unit is e.

F2step 1.1algebra
2.2

Set U=(i00i) and V=(0110). We have U2=V2=I and VU=UV, so the multiplication table defines an E-algebra map EQDM2(E) sending e,x,y,w to I,U,V,UV. A linear combination of these images is (a+bic+dic+diabi). Every matrix occurs uniquely: its entries r,s,t,h give a=(r+h)/2, b=(rh)/(2i), c=(st)/2, d=(s+t)/(2i). Thus the map is an algebra isomorphism.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Let f=1e=(1+z)/2. The complementary block has basis f,uf,vf,uvf by the same disjoint-pair argument. Here zf=f, so uf,vf commute and square to f. Evaluating them independently at ϵ,η{1,1} gives a map Q[Q8]fQ4. Its sign matrix has rows (1,ϵ,η,ϵη); the inner product of a row with itself is 4, and with a different row is (1+ϵϵ)(1+ηη)=0. Its inverse is one quarter its transpose. Hence Q[Q8]D×Q4 and, extending the displayed basis maps, E[Q8]M2(E)×E4. The rational regular module is the direct sum of D and four copies of Q, each simple over its factor; the extended regular module is the sum of the two simple columns of M2(E) and four one-dimensional factors. Thus both regular modules are semisimple, and the displayed extended product is split, without an omitted block. The column simples over this product have only scalar endomorphisms (commute with matrix units), so it also satisfies the group splitting-field convention.

F6F2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra
3.2

The subspaces of matrices supported in the first column and in the second column are left ideals, each isomorphic to W=E2 by reading that column. They have zero intersection and their sum is all of M2(E). F2 makes W simple. Consequently EQDWW as group modules, with multiplicity exactly two: its E-dimension is four and dimEW=2.

F2step 2.2algebra
4.1

The polynomial X2+1 has no rational root, and its distinct roots i,i lie in E. Thus E/Q is finite normal separable, with nontrivial automorphism σ(i)=i. Coefficient conjugation sends U to U and fixes V. Since VUV1=U and VVV1=V, conjugation by V intertwines the representation with its coefficient-conjugate; these equations on the generators suffice on every group element. Therefore [W] is Galois-stable. The hypotheses for F1 are all met by step 3.1 and this finite Galois extension. F1 identifies D with this singleton orbit, and step 3.2 computes its common multiplicity as two.

F1step 3.1step 3.2algebra
5.1

The matrices for 1,z,u,v,uv are I,I,U,V,UV. Their traces are 2,2,0,0,0 respectively; multiplying the last three by I keeps their traces zero. The class list follows directly from the relations: conjugation preserves each pair {h,zh} for h=u,v,uv, and conjugation by a different generator exchanges its two members, whereas 1,z are central. Thus this list exhausts all eight elements and gives exactly the stated class values. All values lie in Q. The trace of the rational regular module D is twice this character after extension, since its extension is the displayed two column copies. [F3, F4, F5, step 2.2, step 3.2, algebra] QED

Remarks

The norm computation restricts Zheng, Example 3.7.4(3), p.125, from real to rational coefficients. Wiese, Exercise 14, p.70, suggests the real/complex analogue but supplies no proof; the algebra and matrix calculations here prove the rational example. Wiese, Remark 2.4.2(ii), p.34, distinguishes the four-dimensional regular trace from this degree-two character.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A Galois-stable character need not descend with multiplicity one

Statement refuted

If E/F is finite Galois and splits a finite group's algebra in characteristic zero, then every Galois-stable simple E-representation descends to an F-representation with multiplicity one. In particular, the asserted conclusion would make every such F-valued irreducible character realizable over F.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The orbit theorem allows a common positive multiplicity, not necessarily one: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.

[F2]

For F=Q, E=Q(i) and Q8, the simple E-module W has rational-valued character χ=(2,2,0,0,0) on the five classes, is Galois-stable, and the rational module D satisfies EQDWW. The extension is finite Galois and splits the whole group algebra: The rational simple quaternion block.

Counterexample

Given: The module W in F2, with matrices U=diag(i,i) and V=(0110) for the generators u,v.

1.1

F2 verifies every hypothesis: characteristic zero, finite Galois extension, whole-algebra splitting, simplicity and Galois stability. It also supplies a rational realization of 2χ, namely the four-dimensional simple rational module D. F1 identifies its descent multiplicity with two, in agreement with the explicit column decomposition. It remains to rule out a rational representation of character χ itself.

F1F2given
1.2

Any rational representation with character χ has dimension χ(1)=2. Let Z represent z, so Z2=I and tr(Z)=2. Every vector decomposes as (x+Zx)/2+(xZx)/2, in the +1 and 1 eigenspaces respectively, whose intersection is zero. If their dimensions are r,s, then r+s=2 and rs=2, giving r=0, s=2. Thus Z=I. Its generator matrices R,TM2(Q) would satisfy R2=T2=I and RT=TR, by the relations in F2.

F2algebra
2.1

For any nonzero rational vector x, the vectors x,Rx are independent. Otherwise Rx=rx with rQ, and R2x=r2x=x would force r2=1, impossible. In the basis (x,Rx), R is therefore J=(0110). Write T=(abcd) in this same rational basis. The equation JT+TJ=0 is (bcdaa+dbc)=0, so c=b and d=a.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Consequently T2=(abba)2=(a2+b2)I. It cannot equal I, since a2+b20 in Q. This excludes every rational degree-two representation of character χ, and hence every rational model whose scalar extension is W (scalar extension preserves its matrices' traces). Since step 1.1 realizes 2χ and no positive integer lies strictly between 1 and 2, the least positive rational realization multiplicity is exactly two. The excluded conclusion is multiplicity one, not the common-positive-multiplicity conclusion of F1. [step 1.1, step 1.2, step 2.1, algebra] QED

Remarks

Wiese, Corollary 2.5.10, p.40, discusses the general realizability obstruction; the proof above establishes this witness directly and does not consume a later Schur-index theorem. If “Schur index” is expressed as the minimum degree of a realization field over the character field, the same example also has index two: its character field is Q, degree one is excluded above, and Q(i) is an explicit degree-two realization field.

Sources