How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Galois Orbits and Descent of Simple Finite-Group Modules: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Galois Orbits and Descent of Simple Finite-Group Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Solvability by Radicals and Kummer Theory
- Splitting Fields
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The cyclic group of order three illustrates a two-element Galois orbit with multiplicity one: a rational matrix diagonalizes over the quadratic cyclotomic field. The quaternion group illustrates a singleton orbit with multiplicity two: a rational division block becomes a full matrix algebra over .
Explicit bases, eigenvectors, idempotents, matrix inverses, column decompositions and traces verify both examples. A rational two-by-two matrix obstruction then shows why a Galois-stable character need not have an individual rational model. These examples compute the relevant multiplicities directly, without assuming later Schur-index theory.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Descent of the two nontrivial characters of C₃
Example
Let , let where , and let . Multiplication by on the rational space has matrix in the basis . This rational representation is simple. Its scalar extension is the sum of the two one-dimensional representations and , each with multiplicity one. Their Galois orbit has size two. The rational character takes values on . The corresponding rational central idempotent is , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Simple modules over a semisimple algebra correspond to Galois orbits after splitting base change, with one common positive multiplicity: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.
The trace of an endomorphism is the trace of its matrix in any basis: The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space.
The group algebra has the group basis, with multiplication : The group ring is a unital -algebra with basis , and each is a unit of .
Verification
Given: , , and the displayed matrix .
A rational root of would satisfy , impossible in the ordered field . A reducible quadratic over a field has a linear factor and thus a root, so is irreducible and is a rational basis of . We have and ; the two roots are , and they are distinct since equality would force . Both lie in . An embedding of this quadratic field is determined by a root, so the identity and are its two automorphisms. Equivalently it is a finite normal separable extension, hence Galois, with this two-element group.
Multiplication sends and , giving . Direct multiplication gives , and . Thus it defines a -action. For , the vectors are rationally independent, because in the field implies . Any nonzero invariant rational subspace contains such and , and hence equals . This proves simplicity.
Put . Since every group element occurs three times in its square, . Thus is central and . Also , whence . The two coefficient vectors and are independent: gives , so . They span the ideal by the relation just found. Evaluation sends and , so restricts to an algebra isomorphism , preserving the block unit. The full evaluation map has kernel : if , then , so .
For either or , set . Then . The determinant of is , so these form an -basis of . Consequently both eigenline modules occur exactly once. Conjugating coefficients interchanges the two eigenvectors and their distinct eigenvalues; the lines give nonisomorphic one-dimensional modules since an intertwiner between them would force .
To check the splitting hypothesis for the whole algebra, evaluation at gives . Its inverse sends the th coordinate vector to , where and the product ranges over the other two roots. All denominators are nonzero, and proves the inverse identities on evaluations; a degree at most two polynomial vanishing at three distinct roots is zero, by successive division by . Thus the algebra is split. The characteristic-zero specialization of F1 now identifies the orbit in step 3.1 with the simple rational module in step 2.1, with multiplicity as computed.
Finally , and . On either eigenline the traces are its scalar values; adding gives at and at . This checks the character and the identity value directly. [F2, step 1.1, step 2.1, step 3.1, algebra] QED
Remarks
This is the quadratic cyclotomic specialization of Zheng, Example 3.8.2, p.133, and Wiese, Corollary 2.2.12, p.30. Matrices, eigenvectors and the rational block identification are computed above.
The rational simple quaternion block
Example
Write the quaternion group as , where is the group element , , and . The central idempotent in cuts out the four-dimensional division algebra Its unique simple left module is itself. For , , and its left regular module is , where is simple of degree two. The character of has values on the classes . Its Galois orbit is a singleton but its descent multiplicity is two. In fact splits the entire group algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
The orbit classification gives the common scalar-extension multiplicity under the semisimple and splitting hypotheses: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.
A matrix-ring factor over a division ring has one simple left-module class, its column module: Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings.
Trace is the sum of the diagonal entries of a representing matrix: The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space.
The quaternion group is the set of eight signed basis quaternions, with multiplication inherited from the quaternion algebra: The quaternion group inside the nonzero quaternions.
These elements form a group of order eight, and has order two: is a subgroup of with eight elements, and is its only element of order .
The group algebra has the group basis, with multiplication : The group ring is a unital -algebra with basis , and each is a unit of .
Verification
Given: as in F4–F5, renamed with generators , and where .
The quaternion multiplication gives central, , and . Thus and . The four elements span , since for . They are rationally independent: has its two nonzero coefficients on one of four disjoint pairs of the eight group-basis elements. Hence they form a basis. Write , , ; then , , , and .
For , put . Using the multiplication table, all mixed terms cancel and . For rational coefficients this sum is positive when . Thus exists on both sides, and is a division algebra. Every nonzero left ideal contains an invertible element and hence , so its left regular module is simple. F2 for a single factor says this is its unique simple class. The zero quaternion needs no inverse; the unit is .
Set and . We have and , so the multiplication table defines an -algebra map sending to . A linear combination of these images is . Every matrix occurs uniquely: its entries give , , , . Thus the map is an algebra isomorphism.
Let . The complementary block has basis by the same disjoint-pair argument. Here , so commute and square to . Evaluating them independently at gives a map . Its sign matrix has rows ; the inner product of a row with itself is , and with a different row is . Its inverse is one quarter its transpose. Hence and, extending the displayed basis maps, . The rational regular module is the direct sum of and four copies of , each simple over its factor; the extended regular module is the sum of the two simple columns of and four one-dimensional factors. Thus both regular modules are semisimple, and the displayed extended product is split, without an omitted block. The column simples over this product have only scalar endomorphisms (commute with matrix units), so it also satisfies the group splitting-field convention.
The subspaces of matrices supported in the first column and in the second column are left ideals, each isomorphic to by reading that column. They have zero intersection and their sum is all of . F2 makes simple. Consequently as group modules, with multiplicity exactly two: its -dimension is four and .
The polynomial has no rational root, and its distinct roots lie in . Thus is finite normal separable, with nontrivial automorphism . Coefficient conjugation sends to and fixes . Since and , conjugation by intertwines the representation with its coefficient-conjugate; these equations on the generators suffice on every group element. Therefore is Galois-stable. The hypotheses for F1 are all met by step 3.1 and this finite Galois extension. F1 identifies with this singleton orbit, and step 3.2 computes its common multiplicity as two.
The matrices for are . Their traces are respectively; multiplying the last three by keeps their traces zero. The class list follows directly from the relations: conjugation preserves each pair for , and conjugation by a different generator exchanges its two members, whereas are central. Thus this list exhausts all eight elements and gives exactly the stated class values. All values lie in . The trace of the rational regular module is twice this character after extension, since its extension is the displayed two column copies. [F3, F4, F5, step 2.2, step 3.2, algebra] QED
Remarks
The norm computation restricts Zheng, Example 3.7.4(3), p.125, from real to rational coefficients. Wiese, Exercise 14, p.70, suggests the real/complex analogue but supplies no proof; the algebra and matrix calculations here prove the rational example. Wiese, Remark 2.4.2(ii), p.34, distinguishes the four-dimensional regular trace from this degree-two character.
A Galois-stable character need not descend with multiplicity one
Statement refuted
If is finite Galois and splits a finite group's algebra in characteristic zero, then every Galois-stable simple -representation descends to an -representation with multiplicity one. In particular, the asserted conclusion would make every such -valued irreducible character realizable over .
Facts & Assumptions
The orbit theorem allows a common positive multiplicity, not necessarily one: Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change.
For , and , the simple -module has rational-valued character on the five classes, is Galois-stable, and the rational module satisfies . The extension is finite Galois and splits the whole group algebra: The rational simple quaternion block.
Counterexample
Given: The module in F2, with matrices and for the generators .
F2 verifies every hypothesis: characteristic zero, finite Galois extension, whole-algebra splitting, simplicity and Galois stability. It also supplies a rational realization of , namely the four-dimensional simple rational module . F1 identifies its descent multiplicity with two, in agreement with the explicit column decomposition. It remains to rule out a rational representation of character itself.
Any rational representation with character has dimension . Let represent , so and . Every vector decomposes as , in the and eigenspaces respectively, whose intersection is zero. If their dimensions are , then and , giving , . Thus . Its generator matrices would satisfy and , by the relations in F2.
For any nonzero rational vector , the vectors are independent. Otherwise with , and would force , impossible. In the basis , is therefore . Write in this same rational basis. The equation is , so and .
Consequently . It cannot equal , since in . This excludes every rational degree-two representation of character , and hence every rational model whose scalar extension is (scalar extension preserves its matrices' traces). Since step 1.1 realizes and no positive integer lies strictly between and , the least positive rational realization multiplicity is exactly two. The excluded conclusion is multiplicity one, not the common-positive-multiplicity conclusion of F1. [step 1.1, step 1.2, step 2.1, algebra] QED
Remarks
Wiese, Corollary 2.5.10, p.40, discusses the general realizability obstruction; the proof above establishes this witness directly and does not consume a later Schur-index theorem. If “Schur index” is expressed as the minimum degree of a realization field over the character field, the same example also has index two: its character field is , degree one is excluded above, and is an explicit degree-two realization field.