How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Gaussian wavelet product prior covered by the weak BvM theorem
Example
Let be the standard normal density, take any , and use the product prior scales on an -regular wavelet basis with coefficients at level , as in the weak BvM theorem. Let the truth have coefficients , so for every . With and , all density and coefficient hypotheses of the weak BvM theorem hold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated -regular wavelet basis, the standard normal coefficient density, the scale , and the truth coefficients .
The wavelet product prior is L2-valued: For and a coefficient density with finite second moment, the wavelet series defines an random element.
Logarithmic negative Sobolev spaces for white noise: The chosen -regular wavelet system is a complete orthonormal basis of .
Riesz-Fischer completeness of for : Under countable choice, is complete.
Density normal laws and square-summable Gaussian series under countable choice: The standard normal density has mean and variance .
Weak nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorem for product priors: For the stated -regular wavelet basis, under countable choice and with the supplied white-noise model and posterior kernel, the weak BvM conclusion holds when the truth's normalized coefficients are bounded by , the prior density is bounded above and bounded below on , has finite second moment, and is continuous at each normalized truth coefficient.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable choice supplies the completeness in [F3] and the prior construction in [F1]; the full posterior kernel is supplied by the model input of [F5], and no full Axiom of Choice is needed for the bounded-Lipschitz conclusion.
Verification
Given: Countable choice, the stated -regular wavelet basis, , , , , and the white-noise experiment and supplied full posterior kernel of [F5].
The standard normal density is bounded and continuous, and [F4] gives its second moment . For , , so . The normalized truth coefficients all equal , hence .
Let . By [F2], for orthogonality gives , whose tail tends to zero. Completeness [F3] and [A1] give a limit ; continuity of each coefficient functional yields . The prior is likewise -valued by [F1] under [A1].
With the stated -regular basis and supplied posterior kernel, all hypotheses of [F5] now hold, including continuity at each ; therefore for every the scaled posterior converges to canonical white noise in the bounded-Lipschitz metric of , in probability under the fixed-truth data law.
Depends on
- The wavelet product prior is L2-valued
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Logarithmic negative Sobolev spaces for white noise
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- Density normal laws and square-summable Gaussian series under countable choice
- Weak nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorem for product priors
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Castillo and Nickl, Nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorems in Gaussian white noise, Condition 1 and Theorem 9, printed pp. 2013–2014 and 2019–2020 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Giné and Nickl, Mathematical Foundations of Infinite-Dimensional Statistical Models, Condition 7.3.11 and Theorem 7.3.19, printed pp. 584 and 595–596 (standard reference, not scraped)