Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Green kernel of the disc at a nonzero pole

Example

Let D={∣z∣<1} be the unit disc (The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors) and let a∈D with a≠0. For z∈D∖{a}, gD(z,a)=log⁡∣1−a‾zz−a∣, with the canonical Green kernel of The canonical Green kernel of a plane domain. The function z↦gD(z,a) is positive on D∖{a}, harmonic there, has logarithmic pole of coefficient one at a, is symmetric gD(z,a)=gD(a,z), and tends to zero as ∣z∣→1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit disc D, a point a∈D with a≠0, the Blaschke factor φa(z)=(a−z)/(1−a‾z) (The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors), modulus and conjugates as in Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, and harmonicity as in Plane harmonic functions.

[F1]

The canonical Green function gΩ(⋅,a) is the pointwise least nonnegative logarithmic-pole candidate at a: candidates are nonnegative, harmonic on Ω∖{a}, and have u+log⁡∣z−a∣ extending harmonically across a (The canonical Green kernel of a plane domain).

[F2]

The map log⁡∣⋅∣ is harmonic on C∖{0} (Logarithmic modulus is harmonic off its centre), and if u is harmonic on an open V and ϕ holomorphic on an open U with ϕ(U)⊆V, then u∘ϕ is harmonic on U (Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate).

[F3]

Sums, differences and real multiples of C2 functions are C2 and the Laplacian is linear, so sums and differences of harmonic functions are harmonic (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition); on the open disc D, the reciprocal and quotient rules make z↦(z−a)/(1−a‾z) holomorphic wherever 1−a‾z≠0 (Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).

[F4]

A harmonic function on a bounded domain that extends continuously to the closure attains its infimum on the boundary (Maximum and minimum principles for plane harmonic functions).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F3algebra

Put M(z):=(z−a)/(1−a‾z)=−(φa(z)). Since ∣a‾z∣≤∣a∣ ∣z∣<1 for z∈D, the denominator does not vanish and M is holomorphic on D by [F3]. For z∈D with ∣z∣=r, ∣1−a‾z∣2−∣z−a∣2=(1−∣a∣2)(1−r2)>0, so ∣M(z)∣<1. No involution property of M is needed.

2.1step 1.1

Hence G(z):=log⁡∣1−a‾z∣−log⁡∣z−a∣=−log⁡∣M(z)∣ satisfies G(z)>0 for z∈D∖{a} and G(z)+log⁡∣z−a∣=log⁡∣1−a‾z∣ for z≠a.

2.2step 1.1algebra

On the circles ∣z∣=r with ∣a∣<r<1 one has 1−∣M(z)∣2=(1−∣a∣2)(1−r2)/∣1−a‾z∣2, where ∣1−a‾z∣≥1−∣a∣r≥1−∣a∣>0; consequently 1−∣M(z)∣2≤(1−∣a∣2)(1−r2)/(1−∣a∣)2→0 as r↑1, uniformly in the argument. For such r, M(z)≠0 on the circle, and G(z)=−log⁡∣M(z)∣=−12log⁡∣M(z)∣2; hence G→0 uniformly on the circles ∣z∣=r as r↑1, and in particular G(z)→0 as ∣z∣→1.

3.1step 2.1algebra

G is symmetric in its two arguments: writing G(z,w)=log⁡∣1−w‾z∣−log⁡∣z−w∣ for the same formula in two variables, the identities ∣1−w‾z∣=∣1−wz‾‾∣=∣1−wz‾∣ and ∣z−w∣=∣w−z∣ give G(z,w)=G(w,z): the two-variable formula is symmetric.

3.2F2F3step 2.1

The two summands of G are harmonic: z↦log⁡∣1−a‾z∣ is (log⁡∣⋅∣)∘(1−a‾z) with 1−a‾z holomorphic and nowhere zero on D, and z↦log⁡∣z−a∣ is (log⁡∣⋅∣)∘(z−a) with z−a holomorphic and nowhere zero on C∖{a}; hence both are harmonic on D∖{a} by [F2], and so is G by [F3].

4.1F1F3F4step 2.2step 3.2

Leastness: let u be any logarithmic-pole candidate at a. Then u+log⁡∣z−a∣ extends across a to a harmonic function on D by [F1], and by step 2.1 the function G+log⁡∣z−a∣ agrees on D∖{a} with the harmonic function log⁡∣1−a‾z∣ of step 3.2; hence D:=u−G extends from D∖{a} to the difference of two harmonic functions on D, which is harmonic by [F3]. Fix ε>0 and let r<1 be so close to 1 that G<ε on ∣z∣=r, as step 2.2 permits. On that circle D=u−G≥−ε because u≥0, so the infimum of D over the closed disc {∣z∣≤r} is at least −ε by [F4]. As ε↓0 and r↑1 we get D≥0, that is u≥G on D∖{a}. Hence G is the pointwise least candidate, so gD(⋅,a)=G by [F1].

4.2F1step 2.1step 3.2

By step 2.1 the function G+log⁡∣z−a∣ agrees on D∖{a} with the harmonic function z↦log⁡∣1−a‾z∣ of step 3.2, which is harmonic on all of D. Together with steps 2.1 and 3.2 this shows that G is a logarithmic-pole candidate at a in the sense of [F1].

5.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 4.2∎

The kernel therefore has all the asserted properties: it is positive on D∖{a} by step 2.1, harmonic there with G+log⁡∣z−a∣ harmonic across a by steps 3.2 and 4.2, symmetric by step 3.1 together with gD=G from step 4.1, and it tends to zero at every boundary point of the unit circle by step 2.2; the logarithmic coefficient is one because log⁡∣z−a∣ is subtracted exactly once. No boundary datum was prescribed and no extension of M beyond the disc was used, so irregular-boundary questions do not arise.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources