How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs for the coinvariant algebra of S_3
Example
For identify the centered reduced longest-element module with , where has dimensions in degrees , so that the centered degrees are . For every strictly dominant hard Lefschetz is the pair of isomorphisms and . The primitive spaces used in the Hodge-Riemann relations are of dimension one and of dimension one; their Lefschetz forms are respectively positive and negative definite, and the primitive decomposition consists of one length-four -string and one length-two -string. For an explicit strictly dominant choice let , , , and normalize . Then , with basis ; the -map from degree to degree has the matrix , , and . These computations verify hard Lefschetz and the primitive signs directly in rank two.
Verification
Given: The coinvariant algebra and the identification with the centered reduced module of (The coinvariant algebra of S_3 as the Soergel bimodule of the longest element), the operator of left multiplication by a strictly dominant degree-two element and the trace normalization (The reduced Soergel module and the dominant Lefschetz operator, The trace, the invariant intersection form on Bott-Samelson bimodules and its reduction), and the hard-Lefschetz and Hodge-Riemann dictionary with the sign for lowest degree (Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR, Hard Lefschetz gives the primitive decomposition, orthogonality and the signature formula).
[F1] The centered module has lowest degree , graded dimensions in degrees and a non-degenerate invariant form normalized by the positive bottom value; for it, hard Lefschetz is together with , and the standard sign in degree is , so the primitive space must be negative definite and positive definite (The coinvariant algebra of S_3 as the Soergel bimodule of the longest element, Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR).
[F2] In the quotient the relations hold and, after the substitution , are equivalent to and ; the reduction of the intersection form is the standard top trace with , and is spanned by the six monomials of the display (The coinvariant algebra of S_3 as the Soergel bimodule of the longest element; the trace identification is checked in step 2.1).
The two-variable model. Put , and . Then , while and ; hence the coinvariant ideal is generated by and , and since the second relation can be replaced by , giving . The monomials span it: the relations and , together with and , reduce every monomial of degree in to one of them, and their independence follows by monic division by over , which gives the free basis over that ring.
The trace and pairing. The rank-two summand map pulls the Bott–Samelson trace back to , as follows by taking the right-coefficient trace successively in the three slots; this is the explicit trace calculation in the rank-two decomposition proof, also obtained directly from the rank-one trace convention. After right reduction it is the top trace on , since , and . Hence and all degrees other than have zero trace. The complementary-degree pairings are in degrees and in degrees , of determinant ; they prove nondegeneracy directly. The form used below is therefore the actual induced reduced intersection form, without invoking the general Hodge theorem.
The special dominant element. For one computes and using ; the matrix of from the degree- block with basis to the degree- block with basis is therefore , whose determinant is , so is an isomorphism. Moreover and : indeed , ; hence and ; hence and , so is an isomorphism as both sides are one-dimensional.
The signs for the special element. With the normalization , the bottom primitive form is , positive as required in degree ; the middle primitive form is , negative as required in degree , where the standard sign is . The primitive decomposition is read off from the two strings: spans the four degrees with one vector each, and spans degrees and ; together they account for all four graded pieces and their dimensions, so there are exactly one length-four string and one length-two string.
The general dominant chamber. Let be strictly dominant, so ; subtracting a multiple of (which is zero in ) writes its class as with . Then and , so the middle matrix is with determinant , and : indeed and , so satisfies , and expanding gives with , , which simplifies to . Hence (one-dimensional, since for ) carries a negative definite Lefschetz form, the bottom form is positive, and every strictly dominant satisfies hard Lefschetz with the standard signs on both primitive spaces.
Conclusion. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 verify the displayed isomorphisms, the two primitive spaces and their signs for the explicit choice, and step 5.1 shows the same for every strictly dominant element; the primitive decomposition has the two strings claimed. This verifies the example by its quotient and trace calculations.
Remarks
- Define the top trace to be zero off degree and to send to . Its multiplication pairing is non-degenerate: the degree- and degree- pieces pair by , and the degree- and degree- pairing in the displayed bases has matrix , of determinant . The divided-difference normalization agrees, since , and . This is a positive scalar normalization of the invariant form, as its bottom Lefschetz value is positive.
- The example is an illustration in rank two and is not used as a supplier in the simultaneous induction; the general statement for is proved on the axiom page by the induction itself.
Depends on
- The coinvariant algebra of S_3 as the Soergel bimodule of the longest element
- Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR
- Hard Lefschetz gives the primitive decomposition, orthogonality and the signature formula
- The reduced Soergel module and the dominant Lefschetz operator
- The trace, the invariant intersection form on Bott-Samelson bimodules and its reduction
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias-Williamson, The Hodge theory of Soergel bimodules (arXiv:1212.0791v2, final version; Ann. of Math. 180 (2014) 1089-1136) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Soergel, Kazhdan-Lusztig-Polynome und unzerlegbare Bimoduln ueber Polynomringen (arXiv:math/0403496, published J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 6 (2007) 501-525) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Riche, La theorie de Hodge des bimodules de Soergel (d'apres Soergel et Elias-Williamson), Seminaire Bourbaki no. 1139 (arXiv:1711.02464, Octobre 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)