How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hard Lefschetz gives the primitive decomposition, orthogonality and the signature formula
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional graded real space concentrated in one parity, with a graded non-degenerate symmetric form and a symmetric degree-two operator , its primitive subspaces , Lefschetz forms , the hypotheses hL and HR with the standard sign and lowest degree , as in Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR.
The form is graded and non-degenerate, so the pairing of homogeneous pieces is perfect and ; is symmetric and of degree two; hL means that is an isomorphism for every , and (Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR).
A symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space has an orthogonal basis, and its inertia and signature are independent of the diagonalizing basis; a form is non-degenerate exactly when its radical is zero (Every symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space over a field of characteristic not has an orthogonal basis, Sylvester's law of inertia: every real symmetric form is congruent to , and is unique, Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form, The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space).
Rank-nullity holds for linear maps of finite-dimensional spaces (Rank-nullity: ).
Symmetry of means for all ; hence for all (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms, Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR).
Statement
Let have a graded non-degenerate symmetric form and a symmetric degree-two operator .
(a) If hL holds then ; more precisely, in each degree one has .
(b) In each degree , the decomposition of (a) is orthogonal for the Lefschetz form .
(c) All Lefschetz forms on are non-degenerate exactly when hL holds.
(d) If has one parity and lowest degree , standard HR is equivalent to hL together with the signature formula for every (zero spaces omitted).
(e) If satisfies hL, an -stable graded subspace with for all inherits hL; if satisfies HR then the restricted form on is non-degenerate and inherits the ambient primitive signs, and its standard global sign agrees with that of when their lowest degrees coincide.
Proof
One step of the decomposition. Under hL the map is an isomorphism, so for every there is with ; then , and hence . The sum is direct: if , then and injectivity of gives ; hence .
Iteration and the primitive decomposition (a). Iterating step 1.1 gives , the sum terminating because for ; For positive degree , hL gives , so applying to the negative-degree decomposition supplies all positive pieces. Reindexing by the lowest primitive degree gives , since every string lies in degrees between and , so for nonzero contributions. This proves (a).
Orthogonality (b). Let and with and consider , in . Using symmetry of repeatedly, , and the exponent satisfies ; since , the pairing vanishes. Hence distinct strings are orthogonal for the Lefschetz form, as claimed.
Non-degeneracy of the Lefschetz forms is equivalent to hL (c). For fixed , the Lefschetz form at degree is the composite of the linear map with the perfect pairing given by the form; the latter is an isomorphism by non-degeneracy of [F1]. Hence the Lefschetz form is non-degenerate if and only if is an isomorphism; this holds simultaneously for all exactly when hL holds, and for both sides are zero by [F1] (). This proves (c).
Signature formula (d). Assume hL and the standard-sign definiteness on primitives. The orthogonal decomposition of step 3.1 expresses the form on as an orthogonal sum of the forms on the primitive spaces ; each of these is definite of sign by HR, and its own inertia is therefore or according to that sign. Sylvester's law [F2] makes the signature of the orthogonal sum the sum of the summand signatures, giving the displayed formula. Conversely, assume hL and the signature formula for all ; descending from the bottom degree, the formula determines the signature of the primitive form on after the signatures of the higher-degree primitive spaces are known, the orthogonal decomposition and step 4.1 make each primitive form non-degenerate, and the subtraction forces its signature to be the prescribed sign times its dimension. Its inertia therefore has only positive or only negative entries by [F2], so each primitive form is definite with the stated sign; this recovers HR. This proves (d).
Stable subspaces (e). Let be -stable with . Since is injective on (hL), its restriction to is injective, and the dimension symmetry makes it an isomorphism onto ; hence satisfies hL for the restricted operator and form. Its primitive spaces are , because the kernel of on is the intersection with the kernel on ; the restricted Lefschetz form on is the restriction of the ambient definite primitive form, hence definite with the ambient sign . The string construction in steps 1.1–2.1 uses only hL, so it applies to before non-degeneracy of its restricted form is known. This primitive decomposition then shows, exactly as in step 5.1, that the restricted form on is an orthogonal sum of definite blocks, hence non-degenerate, and that its signs are the ambient signs; if the lowest nonzero degree of equals , then the ambient sign formula is also the standard sign of . This proves (e) and completes the lemma.
Remarks
- The dimension input follows from step 1.1 and [F3]; it is the string count used implicitly in (a) and (d).
- Part (e) does not assert that an arbitrary -stable subspace with symmetric dimensions is a direct summand of ; it uses only the restricted form, which is shown non-degenerate by the orthogonal-string decomposition.
Depends on
- Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR
- Every symmetric bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space over a field of characteristic not $2$ has an orthogonal basis
- Sylvester's law of inertia: every real symmetric form is congruent to $\operatorname{diag}(I_p,-I_q,0_r)$, and $(p,q,r)$ is unique
- Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia $(p,q,r)$, rank $p+q$, and signature $p-q$ of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form
- Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms
- The matrix, left and right radicals, rank, and nondegeneracy of a bilinear form on a finite-dimensional space
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
Used by
- Hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs for the coinvariant algebra of S₃ Example
- The rank-one Soergel bimodule: trace form, reduced module and hard Lefschetz Example
- Hodge-Riemann relations hold for large positive deformation, and the deformation principle Lemma
- Signature constancy in a Lefschetz family, the L-stable subspace lemma and the weak-Lefschetz substitute Lemma
- Tensoring a direct sum of Hodge-Riemann bimodules with Bₛ preserves the signs Lemma
- Minimal positive Rouquier complexes carry the induced Hodge-Riemann signs Theorem
- Simultaneous induction: Soergel's conjecture, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann relations hold for all elements Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias-Williamson, The Hodge theory of Soergel bimodules (arXiv:1212.0791v2, final version; Ann. of Math. 180 (2014) 1089-1136) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Riche, La theorie de Hodge des bimodules de Soergel (d'apres Soergel et Elias-Williamson), Seminaire Bourbaki no. 1139 (arXiv:1711.02464, Octobre 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)