Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hard Lefschetz gives the primitive decomposition, orthogonality and the signature formula

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional graded real space H concentrated in one parity, with a graded non-degenerate symmetric form ⟨−,−⟩ and a symmetric degree-two operator L, its primitive subspaces PL−i, Lefschetz forms (a,b)L−i=⟨a,Lib⟩, the hypotheses hL and HR with the standard sign and lowest degree −d, as in Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR.

[F1]

The form is graded and non-degenerate, so the pairing of homogeneous pieces Hm×H−m→R is perfect and dim⁡Hm=dim⁡H−m; L is symmetric and of degree two; hL means that Li:H−i→Hi is an isomorphism for every i≥0, and PL−i=ker⁡(Li+1∣H−i) (Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR).

[F3]

Rank-nullity holds for linear maps of finite-dimensional spaces (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T).

[F4]

Symmetry of L means ⟨La,b⟩=⟨a,Lb⟩ for all a,b; hence ⟨Lka,b⟩=⟨a,Lkb⟩ for all k≥0 (Bilinear forms, and symmetric, skew-symmetric, and alternating bilinear forms, Primitive subspaces, hard Lefschetz and the Hodge-Riemann signs: the dictionary of hypotheses S, hL and HR).

Statement

Let H have a graded non-degenerate symmetric form and a symmetric degree-two operator L.

(a) If hL holds then H=⨁i≥0⨁j=0iLjPL−i; more precisely, in each degree −i one has H−i=⨁k≥0LkPL−(i+2k).

(b) In each degree −i, the decomposition of (a) is orthogonal for the Lefschetz form ⟨a,Lib⟩.

(c) All Lefschetz forms on H−i are non-degenerate exactly when hL holds.

(d) If H has one parity and lowest degree −d, standard HR is equivalent to hL together with the signature formula sig⁡(⟨−,Li−⟩∣H−i)=∑k≥0(−1)(d−i−2k)/2dim⁡PL−(i+2k) for every i≥0 (zero spaces omitted).

(e) If H satisfies hL, an L-stable graded subspace V⊆H with dim⁡V−i=dim⁡Vi for all i inherits hL; if H satisfies HR then the restricted form on V is non-degenerate and V inherits the ambient primitive signs, and its standard global sign agrees with that of H when their lowest degrees coincide.

Proof

technique · direct; primitive-string decomposition and orthogonal signature bookkeeping
1.1givenF1algebra

One step of the decomposition. Under hL the map Li+2:H−i−2→Hi+2 is an isomorphism, so for every a∈H−i there is b∈H−i−2 with Li+1a=Li+2b; then a−Lb∈PL−i, and hence H−i=PL−i+L H−i−2. The sum is direct: if Lb∈PL−i, then 0=Li+1(Lb)=Li+2b and injectivity of Li+2 gives b=0; hence H−i=PL−i⊕L H−i−2.

2.1step 1.1F1

Iteration and the primitive decomposition (a). Iterating step 1.1 gives H−i=PL−i⊕L PL−i−2⊕L2PL−i−4⊕⋯=⨁k≥0LkPL−(i+2k), the sum terminating because H−m=0 for m>d; For positive degree i, hL gives Hi=LiH−i, so applying Li to the negative-degree decomposition supplies all positive pieces. Reindexing by the lowest primitive degree gives H=⨁i≥0⨁j=0iLjPL−i, since every string LkPL−i lies in degrees between −i and i, so k≤i for nonzero contributions. This proves (a).

3.1step 2.1F1F4algebra

Orthogonality (b). Let p∈PL−(i+2k) and q∈PL−(i+2l) with k<l and consider a=Lkp, b=Llq in H−i. Using symmetry of L repeatedly, (a,b)L−i=⟨Lkp,Li+lq⟩=⟨p,Li+k+lq⟩, and the exponent satisfies i+k+l≥i+2k+1; since Li+2k+1p=0, the pairing vanishes. Hence distinct strings are orthogonal for the Lefschetz form, as claimed.

4.1step 3.1F1F3

Non-degeneracy of the Lefschetz forms is equivalent to hL (c). For fixed i, the Lefschetz form at degree −i is the composite of the linear map Li:H−i→Hi with the perfect pairing Hi×H−i→R given by the form; the latter is an isomorphism Hi→(H−i)∗ by non-degeneracy of ⟨−,−⟩ [F1]. Hence the Lefschetz form is non-degenerate if and only if Li is an isomorphism; this holds simultaneously for all i≥0 exactly when hL holds, and for i>d both sides are zero by [F1] (dim⁡Hi=dim⁡H−i=0). This proves (c).

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F2

Signature formula (d). Assume hL and the standard-sign definiteness on primitives. The orthogonal decomposition of step 3.1 expresses the form on H−i as an orthogonal sum of the forms (p,q)↦⟨p,Li+2kq⟩ on the primitive spaces PL−(i+2k); each of these is definite of sign (−1)(d−i−2k)/2 by HR, and its own inertia is therefore (dim⁡P,0,0) or (0,dim⁡P,0) according to that sign. Sylvester's law [F2] makes the signature of the orthogonal sum the sum of the summand signatures, giving the displayed formula. Conversely, assume hL and the signature formula for all i; descending from the bottom degree, the formula determines the signature of the primitive form on PL−(i+2k) after the signatures of the higher-degree primitive spaces are known, the orthogonal decomposition and step 4.1 make each primitive form non-degenerate, and the subtraction forces its signature to be the prescribed sign times its dimension. Its inertia therefore has only positive or only negative entries by [F2], so each primitive form is definite with the stated sign; this recovers HR. This proves (d).

6.1step 2.1step 4.1step 5.1F1F2∎

Stable subspaces (e). Let V⊆H be L-stable with dim⁡V−i=dim⁡Vi. Since Li is injective on H (hL), its restriction to V is injective, and the dimension symmetry makes it an isomorphism onto Vi; hence V satisfies hL for the restricted operator and form. Its primitive spaces are PV−i=V−i∩PL−i, because the kernel of Li+1 on V−i is the intersection with the kernel on H−i; the restricted Lefschetz form on PV−i is the restriction of the ambient definite primitive form, hence definite with the ambient sign (−1)(d−i)/2. The string construction in steps 1.1–2.1 uses only hL, so it applies to V before non-degeneracy of its restricted form is known. This primitive decomposition then shows, exactly as in step 5.1, that the restricted form on V is an orthogonal sum of definite blocks, hence non-degenerate, and that its signs are the ambient signs; if the lowest nonzero degree of V equals −d, then the ambient sign formula is also the standard sign of V. This proves (e) and completes the lemma.

Remarks

  • The dimension input dim⁡PL−i=dim⁡H−i−dim⁡H−i−2 follows from step 1.1 and [F3]; it is the string count used implicitly in (a) and (d).
  • Part (e) does not assert that an arbitrary L-stable subspace with symmetric dimensions is a direct summand of H; it uses only the restricted form, which is shown non-degenerate by the orthogonal-string decomposition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources