How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ordered eigenvalue bisection by exact inertia queries
Example
For the singleton Hermitian family , a valid outward Frobenius upper bound , tolerance , query budget , and the scalar pivot plan with threshold , exact inertia queries return the ordered eigenvalue brackets
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The singleton matrix family, initial bracket , tolerance, budget and fixed pivot plan above.
A successful bisection loop preserves each ordered eigenvalue bracket after every exact count below a nonsingular shift (Certified inertia counts maintain ordered eigenvalue brackets).
The interval inertia certifier reports the exact inertia on success (The interval block LDL certifier returns the exact inertia on success).
The finite bisection procedure uses the initial uniform Frobenius bracket and updates the least unfinished index at each query (Budgeted ordered Hermitian eigenvalue bisection by verified inertia).
A successful run's returned intervals enclose the corresponding eigenvalues (The ordered Hermitian bisection certifier returns valid intervals or an inconclusive status).
Verification
The Frobenius norm of is , so the stated initial bracket is valid. On each queried shift, the shifted matrix remains diagonal with nonzero scalar pivots; the exact midpoint factorization succeeds, and its interval pivots are degenerate intervals with the same nonzero signs. Thus [F2] certifies the counts shown below.
For , the successive shifts have respectively negative eigenvalues of . The update rule gives brackets , , , and . For , shifts have respectively negative eigenvalues, giving brackets , , , and . These are eight successful queries, and both final widths are .
The exact increasing eigenvalues are and , which lie in the displayed final intervals. More generally, the interval conclusions follow from [F4] applied to the certified run; no failed-pivot case occurs here.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas J. Higham, Numerical Linear Algebra and Matrix Analysis, MIMS EPrint2015.103 (standard reference, not scraped)