How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Hölder-density entropy bound gives the source-covered rate
Example
Let and let be the class of measurable probability densities on satisfying and . Suppose a dominated IID model has truth , density image at each , and a proper prior on a measurable parameterization of this class with a jointly measurable density family. Assume its Hellinger packing numbers obey for all sufficiently small . Fix , choose , and set and for . Assume that, for all sufficiently large , Here is Lebesgue measure on , and the log-square expression is the second moment, with the weighted integrand zero where and where , as in IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass. Take the full parameter space as the sieve, so its prior tail is zero. Then the entropy balance gives the source-covered rate under the theorem's sufficient conditions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The density class, its stated packing-entropy bound, the proper prior and jointly measurable dominated IID model, the local KL/log-square prior-mass bound, and .
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice used by the likelihood-density and directional KL conventions inherited from IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass.
Sieve metric entropy produces uniform exponential tests defines as the supremal cardinality of a finite subset whose pairwise Hellinger distances exceed .
Kullback–Leibler divergence uses the directional convention , with value if .
IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass gives contraction in the selected metric in -probability when the entropy, sieve-tail, and local KL/log-square prior-mass conditions hold.
Verification
Given: The hypotheses in the Example.
The chosen is fixed and , so and . For all sufficiently large , the assumed entropy bound gives because . The full-space sieve has , and the local prior-mass premise is exactly the theorem's remaining prior condition.
All hypotheses of [F3] now hold eventually with the Hellinger metric and the positive sequence . Hence for sufficiently large fixed , the posterior mass outside the Hellinger ball of radius tends to zero in -probability. This is a sufficient-condition rate calculation only; it does not prove the class's entropy bound or assert a minimax lower bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Subhashis Ghosal, The Dirichlet Process, Related Priors and Posterior Asymptotics, §2.5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Subhashis Ghosal, Jayanta K. Ghosh and Aad W. van der Vaart, Convergence rates of posterior distributions, Theorem 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)