How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sieve metric entropy produces uniform exponential tests
Statement
Let be a measure space with a fixed sigma-finite measure. A probability density is a finite-valued nonnegative measurable with , and its induced law is as in The measure with density relative to . Let be a probability density and write . Let be a family of such densities, write for , and let be nonempty. Let be IID under each law used below. The selected metric is one of:
- the root-L2 Hellinger distance of Root-L2 Hellinger distance between density laws;
- the full density distance ;
- the density distance , provided a fixed bounds and every by almost everywhere.
For , let be the supremum of the cardinalities of finite subsets of whose distinct points have -distance greater than . Suppose , , , and Then for every fixed and all sufficiently large , there is a measurable test such that, for some depending only on the selected metric (and on in the case), and for every with .
The entropy metric is the same metric used in the separation and test-error conclusion. The convention is the full integral , which equals twice the library event-supremum total variation distance.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A sigma-finite measure , a density family , its nonempty subset , density , a selected metric from the Statement, and a sequence satisfying the stated entropy and rate conditions.
In the branch only, assume and every model density satisfy -almost everywhere for one fixed finite .
Root-L2 Hellinger distance between density laws: under the fixed common dominator.
Hellinger distance is a metric and controls L1 and total variation: satisfies the triangle inequality, , and .
Total variation distance for probability laws: for probability laws, .
Bernstein tail bound for independent bounded sums: for independent centered variables bounded in absolute value by with total variance , each one-sided tail at is at most .
Identical distribution and IID families: an IID sample is mutually independent and has one common law.
Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence and Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent: measurable functions of independent coordinates remain independent, and disjoint finite coordinate blocks are independent.
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative product-measurable functions on sigma-finite product spaces may be integrated in either order.
Independent random elements have product joint law: a finite IID sample has the product of its one-observation laws as its joint law. For a density , Tonelli and the density-measure definition give the product density relative to : its masses on measurable rectangles factor into the product-law rectangle masses, and uniqueness on the generating product rectangles identifies the measures (The measure with density relative to , The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system).
Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including : and norms satisfy the triangle inequality.
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: the integral Cauchy–Schwarz inequality holds for two functions.
The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The real exponential function and the number by a power series and The exponential function is strictly increasing: the natural logarithm is increasing and inverse to the real exponential, whose power series has nonnegative terms at positive arguments.
The exponential function is smooth and : the derivative of is .
Basic identities for a probability measure: the probability of a finite union is at most the sum of the event probabilities.
The measure with density relative to : the law associated with a nonnegative measurable density is the measure .
Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: sums, differences, products, and lattice operations on measurable functions preserve measurability.
Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability: composing measurable functions with Borel maps preserves measurability, including square roots, signs, and threshold events used below.
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral and Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: the nonnegative integral preserves order, is additive, and is homogeneous under positive finite scalars.
Proof
Put and, for integers , set and . These shells cover every with . The selected metrics are bounded on probability densities: by [F1], by [F17] and the unit-mass densities, and in the branch only, [A2] and [F17] give . Thus only finitely many shells are nonempty for fixed . For each nonempty shell choose a maximal subset whose distinct points are more than apart. Such a finite maximal set exists: the attainable cardinalities of finite -separated subsets form a nonempty bounded subset of , so a largest cardinality is attained. Since and , ; its size is at most . Maximality puts every shell member within of a center, and the triangle inequality gives for each center. Only finitely many choices are made for each , so no arbitrary-index choice axiom is used to form the nets.
Now let . For a center in shell , put , , and , with . By [F15, F16], is measurable, so its sample mean and threshold event are measurable. Then , , and every with satisfies . Test by whether the sample mean of is at least . Under either law, the centered summands have variance at most one and absolute value at most two; also . Bernstein [F4] with , total variance at most and bound gives exponent at least , so each error is at most . Thus this branch has .
Now let and assume [A2]. At center , put , , and . This is measurable by [F15]. Then . Since , every with satisfies, by [F10], . Also , for or by [A2] and monotonicity [F17], and under either law because . Testing the sample mean at threshold and applying [F4] with total variance at most , bound , and gives exponent at least . Thus each error is at most and .
Fix a nonempty shell, write , , and let . First consider . Write and . By [F10], ; the affinity integrand is measurable by [F15, F16]. Since , this gives . By step 1.1 and nonemptiness, . Set . For , has value zero at and derivative by monotonicity of the exponential; hence . On a block of observations use . The products and comparison event are measurable by [F15, F16]. Tonelli on the finite product space gives product affinity , and . Its type-I error under is at most this affinity, since on the product density is at most ; its type-II error under is at most the same bound by the symmetric inequality on .
If lies in the Hellinger ball , then Tonelli on the measurable product densities gives , since for . By [F2], . Since for a nonempty Hellinger shell, , , and , so . Indeed, [F11] gives , hence ; also . For the event , the change in probability from to is at most TV, so the type-II error is at most uniformly over this ball.
Divide the first observations into disjoint blocks and reject when at least half of their block tests reject. The block indicators are independent under both and by [F5]–[F6]. Under , each has mean at most ; under the ball alternatives each has mean at least . Their variances are at most and their centered absolute values at most one. Under , rejection forces an upward deviation at least , so [F4] gives . Under an alternative, acceptance forces a downward deviation at least , so [F4] gives . Since , implies eventually and ; hence both errors are at most . Thus .
In the selected branch let be its constant from steps 4.1, 1.2, or 1.3. If there are no nonempty shells, the alternative set is empty and define . Otherwise choose each center's local test and let be their maximum over the finitely many centers in the nonempty shells. The local tests are measurable by the density-difference, product, and threshold measurability in [F15, F16]; a finite maximum remains measurable. For a fixed alternative in shell , its nearby center supplies type-II error at most . For type I, the union bound over at most centers per shell gives for all sufficiently large : writing , the sum is , whose consecutive-term ratio is at most . This proves the two test bounds for the same metric used in the packing condition.
Depends on
- Root-L2 Hellinger distance between density laws
- Hellinger distance is a metric and controls L1 and total variation
- Bernstein tail bound for independent bounded sums
- Total variation distance for probability laws
- The measure with density $f$ relative to $\mu$
- Identical distribution and IID families
- Independent random elements have product joint law
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
- Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence
- Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including $p = \infty$
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- The real exponential function and the number $e$ by a power series
- The exponential function is strictly increasing
- The exponential function is smooth and $(\exp)'=\exp$
- Basic identities for a probability measure
- Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined
- Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Subhashis Ghosal, Jayanta K. Ghosh and Aad W. van der Vaart, Convergence rates of posterior distributions, Theorem 7.1 and proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- Subhashis Ghosal, The Dirichlet Process, Related Priors and Posterior Asymptotics, §2.5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. J. K. Kleijn, Bayesian Statistics for Frequentists, §6.4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joel A. Tropp, Probability in High Dimensions, Caltech ACM 217 lecture notes, Lecture 4 (standard reference, not scraped)