How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convexity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Domination and Likelihood Ratios
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability Spaces and Random Variables
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass
- Independence Borel Cantelli and Zero One Laws
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Minimax Lower Bounds
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Stationary Markov Chains and Ergodic Limits
- Statistical Experiments, Models and Identifiability
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Integral Logarithm and the Equivalence of Its Characterisations
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Laws and Series of Independent Random Variables
2 · Summary
Objective
The examples verify the global-entropy theorem in a regular Bernoulli density model, calculate the source-covered Hölder entropy balance under its explicit prior-mass premise, and show that entropy is sufficient rather than necessary by using a point prior whose posterior remains exactly at the truth while a deliberately broad sieve violates the entropy inequality. The Bernoulli rate includes the logarithmic overhead of the global entropy condition; none of the examples asserts a generic minimax or almost-sure guarantee.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A one-parameter density prior meets the logarithmic contraction conditions
Example
Fix . The sample space is with counting measure, and , for . Let and let be the prior with constant density on . The parameter sieve is , its density image is , and the selected distance is the full density distance .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Bernoulli density model and prior above, and the constants .
Assume AC for the likelihood-density versions used by IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass (The Axiom of Choice). The map is jointly measurable directly from its two displayed affine sections.
IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass: if the same-metric entropy, sieve-tail and local KL/log-square prior-mass conditions hold, posterior mass outside tends to zero in -probability for sufficiently large fixed .
Kullback–Leibler divergence: , with this argument direction.
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with : continuity on a closed interval and differentiability on its interior give a point where the difference quotient equals the derivative.
Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: the logarithm is continuous on and logarithms of positive products and quotients obey the usual sum and difference identities.
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with and Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when : derivatives obey the chain, sum, scalar, product, and quotient rules.
Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers: for , is differentiable with derivative .
A function differentiable at is continuous at : differentiability on an open interval gives continuity at each point of that interval.
Verification
Put for . For two parameters, . Hence an -packing of has at most points, so for all sufficiently large . Since , its prior complement has mass zero. Also and .
For , use [F5] to write , with . The chain, sum, and scalar rules [F6], together with [F4], give and ; the reciprocal-power derivative in this computation is [F7]. These formulas show that and are differentiable on ; hence they are continuous there by [F8], so the mean value theorem hypotheses hold on the relevant subintervals of . The explicit bound holds there. For , apply the mean-value theorem [F3] first to and then to to obtain . Put . For the log-square term, apply [F3] to and ; these functions are continuous on by [F5], and the chain rule [F6] and derivative bounds and give , for example with . At , both contrasts are zero by [F2, F5], so both bounds also hold.
Choose with . For all sufficiently large , the interval lies in and is contained in the theorem's local KL/log-square set. Its uniform prior mass is . Since while , there is a fixed such that this mass is at least for large .
All hypotheses of [F1] now hold with ; consequently the posterior mass of tends to zero in -probability for sufficiently large fixed . The rate furnished by this global-entropy theorem is in the full density norm; this example makes no minimax-optimality claim.
A sieve can miss the entropy bound while the posterior contracts exactly
Example
Let , let be IID Bernoulli, and put the full Bernoulli family in every sieve . Take the true value and prior . In the full density metric, the entropy premise of IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass fails for at all sufficiently large , although the other displayed conditions hold and the posterior mass outside every positive-radius ball is exactly zero for every data vector.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Bernoulli model, its jointly measurable mass function , , the point prior at , and .
IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass defines the data-fiber posterior by likelihood-weighted normalization on finite positive evidence, and its contraction conclusion is in -probability under the stated entropy, sieve-tail, and local KL/log-square conditions.
Sieve metric entropy produces uniform exponential tests defines using finite sets whose pairwise full density distances exceed .
Kullback–Leibler divergence uses the direction .
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice for the imported directional KL convention; all displayed Bernoulli densities and the point-prior update are explicit.
Probability measures and probability spaces: the IID Bernoulli sampling law is a probability measure on the finite data vectors.
The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function and Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm give the natural-log product and quotient identities; The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t gives for .
Identical distribution and IID families defines the IID sampling regime.
Verification
Given: The model, sieve, prior, truth, and rate sequence in the Example.
Put . For , , and The integral formula [F5] gives for , hence . Thus and the rate conditions in [F1] hold.
For , set . These parameters lie in , and Therefore and For , [F5] gives . If , then . Hence the entropy premise fails for all sufficiently large .
The sieve is the full parameter space, so . Its local KL/log-square set contains , where and ; consequently its prior mass is , which exceeds for every .
For any data vector , the likelihood at the sole prior atom is , so the evidence is also . The normalization in [F1] therefore gives . For every , its mass on is exactly zero for every sample, and thus it contracts in -probability under the IID data law [F4, F6] despite the failed entropy condition.
A Hölder-density entropy bound gives the source-covered rate
Example
Let and let be the class of measurable probability densities on satisfying and . Suppose a dominated IID model has truth , density image at each , and a proper prior on a measurable parameterization of this class with a jointly measurable density family. Assume its Hellinger packing numbers obey for all sufficiently small . Fix , choose , and set and for . Assume that, for all sufficiently large , Here is Lebesgue measure on , and the log-square expression is the second moment, with the weighted integrand zero where and where , as in IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass. Take the full parameter space as the sieve, so its prior tail is zero. Then the entropy balance gives the source-covered rate under the theorem's sufficient conditions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The density class, its stated packing-entropy bound, the proper prior and jointly measurable dominated IID model, the local KL/log-square prior-mass bound, and .
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice used by the likelihood-density and directional KL conventions inherited from IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass.
Sieve metric entropy produces uniform exponential tests defines as the supremal cardinality of a finite subset whose pairwise Hellinger distances exceed .
Kullback–Leibler divergence uses the directional convention , with value if .
IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass gives contraction in the selected metric in -probability when the entropy, sieve-tail, and local KL/log-square prior-mass conditions hold.
Verification
Given: The hypotheses in the Example.
The chosen is fixed and , so and . For all sufficiently large , the assumed entropy bound gives because . The full-space sieve has , and the local prior-mass premise is exactly the theorem's remaining prior condition.
All hypotheses of [F3] now hold eventually with the Hellinger metric and the positive sequence . Hence for sufficiently large fixed , the posterior mass outside the Hellinger ball of radius tends to zero in -probability. This is a sufficient-condition rate calculation only; it does not prove the class's entropy bound or assert a minimax lower bound.
Sources
- Subhashis Ghosal, Jayanta K. Ghosh and Aad W. van der Vaart, Convergence rates of posterior distributions, Theorem 2.1 and finite-dimensional discussion
- Subhashis Ghosal, The Dirichlet Process, Related Priors and Posterior Asymptotics, §2.5.3
- Subhashis Ghosal, Jayanta K. Ghosh and Aad W. van der Vaart, Convergence rates of posterior distributions, Theorem 2.1
- Subhashis Ghosal, The Dirichlet Process, Related Priors and Posterior Asymptotics, §2.5.2