Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hyperbolic space is complete

Example

Assume ACω. The Poincaré upper half-plane H={(x,y)R2:y>0},g=dx2+dy2y2, is geodesically complete and is complete for its Riemannian distance dg. The second assertion concerns dg, not the restricted Euclidean distance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed upper half-plane, metric, and ACω.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) names the assumed ACω.

[F2]

Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component turns an explicit continuous path between each pair of points into connectedness. For the stated half-plane, the straight segment has coordinates affine in its parameter and so is continuous in the Euclidean subspace topology.

[F3]

Geodesics in the Poincare upper half-plane proves that every nonconstant affinely parametrized geodesic in (H,g) is a restriction of one of the globally defined curves (a,bekt),(a+Rtanh(kt+c),Rsech(kt+c)), where k0, b>0, and R>0, and proves conversely that both displayed families are geodesics. It also identifies the zero-speed geodesics as the constant curves.

[F4]

Under [A1], Geodesically complete Riemannian manifold says that a boundaryless Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete exactly when every unique maximal geodesic has domain R.

[F5]

Under [A1], Hopf–Rinow theorem says, for a nonempty connected boundaryless Riemannian manifold, that geodesic completeness is equivalent to completeness for the Riemannian distance.

Verification

1.1

The point (0,1) lies in H. If p=(x,y)H and qp2<y/2, then [F1] gives qyyqp2<y/2, whence qy>y/2>0 and qH; hence H is open. For the coefficient f(x,y)=y2, define c0=1 and cr+1=(r+2)cr. Induction with the product and quotient rules in [F1] gives yrf=cryr2 for every r0; any iterated partial containing x is zero. The one-variable function hr(y)=cryr2 is differentiable and hence continuous on (0,). Since qyyq(x,y)2 by [F1], continuity of hr makes (x,y)hr(y) continuous on H. Thus the Ck criterion in [F1] for every k makes f smooth. Finally, for v=(v1,v2)0, g(x,y)(v,v)=v12+v22y2>0. Thus [F1] makes (H,g) a nonempty boundaryless Riemannian two-manifold.

F1giveninductionalgebra
1.2

For p,qH and s[0,1], the second coordinate of (1s)p+sq is the positive number (1s)py+sqy. The coordinate polynomials in s are continuous and their pair has image in H, so this segment is a path from p to q. Thus H is path-connected, and [F2] makes it connected.

F2givenalgebra
1.3

The curves in [F3] are defined for every tR. Their hyperbolic speeds can also be read directly. The vertical curve has g(γ˙,γ˙)=k2b2e2ktb2e2kt=k2. For the semicircle put U=kt+c, T=tanhU, and S=sechU. Then x˙=RkS2,y˙=RkST,y=RS, and S2+T2=1, so g(γ˙,γ˙)=R2k2S4+R2k2S2T2R2S2=k2. In particular k=1 gives hyperbolic arclength parametrizations on all of R; arbitrary k0 gives complete affine constant-speed parametrizations.

F3algebra
2.1

Fix initial data and let γ:IH be its unique maximal geodesic. If its initial velocity is zero, the constant geodesic with that initial data is defined on R, so maximality gives I=R. Otherwise [F3] identifies γ on I with a restriction of one of the two curves in step 1.3, and [F3] proves that the corresponding curve on all of R is a geodesic. It is therefore an extension of γ unless I=R. Maximality forces I=R in every case, and [F4] makes (H,g) geodesically complete.

F3F4step 1.3
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 verify the nonempty, connected, boundaryless Riemannian hypotheses of [F5], and step 2.1 verifies its geodesic-completeness condition. The implication from that condition to metric completeness in [F5] therefore makes (H,dg) complete. The explicit classification and extension calculation in steps 1.1--2.1 use no choice; ACω is used only through the current maximal-geodesic completeness convention [F4] and Hopf--Rinow [F5].

A1F4F5step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Source locators

  • Datar, Example 15.1.6, printed p. 115, supplies the Poincaré metric and its coordinate geodesic equations. Its printed circle equation interchanges the center coordinates; the complete boundary-centered parametrizations used here are those proved in Geodesics in the Poincare upper half-plane, not that misprinted equation. Datar, Theorem 19.2.1 and proof, printed pp. 141--144, supplies the general geodesic/metric completeness equivalence used in step 3.1.
  • Martelli, Chapter 2, Proposition 1.8 and Corollary 1.9, printed p. 24, give globally defined hyperboloid-model geodesics and deduce completeness by Hopf--Rinow. Propositions 1.15--1.17, printed pp. 28--30, identify the upper half-space as the same hyperbolic model, give the metric xn2gE, and parametrize vertical unit-speed geodesics. The local proof above obtains the full two-dimensional vertical/semicircle extension statement from [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources