Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical divisors on hyperelliptic curves

Example

Assume full AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let C be any smooth proper geometrically integral curve over C of algebraic genus g≥2, with hyperelliptic map ϕ:C→PC1 of degree two, and put L=ϕ∗O(1) (Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps). Its complex points form a compact connected Riemann surface X of topological genus g; the local holomorphic charts and the genus comparison are justified below, without presupposing a cohomology comparison theorem.

  1. The canonical bundle satisfies ωC≅L⊗(g−1). For a general fibre P+Q=ϕ−1(t) with P≠Q, K∼(g−1)(P+Q),deg⁡K=2g−2, both algebraically and on X.
  2. For D=(g−1)(P+Q), ℓ(D)=g. After choosing the pulled-back monomial basis, the canonical map is ϕK=Ver⁡g−1∘ϕ:C⟶Pg−1, where Ver⁡g−1 is the degree-(g−1) Veronese embedding. It has degree two onto a rational normal curve and is not an embedding. Other canonical bases change only projective coordinates (The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception).
  3. The analytic Riemann–Roch and duality check is ℓ(K)−ℓ(0)=2g−2+1−g=g−1,ℓ(0)=1, so ℓ(K)=g=h1(X,OX). The algebraic identities h0(C,ωC)=h1(C,OC)=g agree. The restriction map from algebraic canonical sections to holomorphic differentials on X is an isomorphism, so the algebraic and analytic canonical maps coincide under these coordinates.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; a smooth proper geometrically integral complex curve C of algebraic genus g≥2; its degree-two hyperelliptic map ϕ and L=ϕ∗O(1).

[F1]

Full AC is inherited by the algebraic and analytic duality and projectivity suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

The algebraic hyperelliptic canonical theorem gives ωC≅L⊗(g−1) and the Veronese factorization of its canonical map, of generic degree two and not a closed immersion. It has a basis of pulled-back degree-(g−1) monomials (Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps, The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception).

[F3]

Every smooth proper geometrically integral curve admits a closed projective embedding. Complex projective space is compact, Hausdorff and second countable (Every smooth proper curve admits a projective embedding, Complex projective space and its holomorphic charts).

[F4]

Smoothness over C gives local polynomial presentations with m−1 equations and an invertible (m−1)-column Jacobian minor. The holomorphic implicit-function chart lemma gives a free-coordinate chart and holomorphic transitions (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Local holomorphic charts on nonsingular complex algebraic curves).

[F5]

The Kähler differential module of a polynomial quotient is given by its Jacobian relations. At a complex rational point, the map m/m2→Ω⊗C, [a]↦da, is an isomorphism (Jacobian presentation of Ω, Cotangent space at a rational point).

[F6]

Smooth-curve local rings at closed points are DVRs, with every nonzero rational function a unit times an integral power of a uniformizer. The algebraic canonical bundle is ΩC/C1, and its divisor orders are coefficient orders in a regular frame (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors).

[F7]

A nonconstant algebraic map of smooth proper curves is finite and surjective, and its degree is the weighted fibre sum of local DVR orders and residue degrees. For ϕ the degree is two. Closed-point residue fields on C are C (Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves, Finite-type maps from Jacobson rings induce finite residue-field extensions at maximal ideals, The complex numbers are algebraically closed).

[F8]

The algebraic canonical divisor has degree 2g−2 and h0(C,ωC)=h1(C,OC)=g (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections).

[F9]

On a compact Riemann surface of topological genus h, analytic RR and duality give ℓ(0)=1, i(0)=h and i(A)=ℓ(K−A); evaluating at K gives deg⁡K=2h−2. Negative-degree divisors have no sections, and OX(K) identifies with the canonical bundle (The Riemann-Roch theorem on a compact Riemann surface, Serre duality on a compact Riemann surface, Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface, The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

[F10]

Compact-manifold components are open and, by compactness, there are only finitely many. A proper nonconstant holomorphic map has positive weighted fibre degree; multiplicity one gives a holomorphic local inverse. (Components of a topological manifold are open and at most countable, Degree of a proper holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces, Local power-map normal form on Riemann surfaces).

Verification

1.1F1F3F4F10givenconstruct

Embed C projectively by [F3]. Its complex points X are closed in compact projective space because its homogeneous defining equations are continuous, so X is compact, Hausdorff and second countable. At each point [F4] gives a standard smooth chart with one free coordinate z; the implicit-function lemma supplies a holomorphic graph chart, and the transitions are holomorphic. Thus each component of X is a compact Riemann surface, with finitely many components by [F10]. An algebraic morphism is holomorphic in these charts: its coordinate functions are regular fractions whose denominators are nonzero near the point, and compositions with the graph chart are holomorphic. In particular ϕ induces a holomorphic map X→C^.

2.1F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

In a standard smooth chart the invertible Jacobian minor lets [F5] eliminate all dependent coordinate differentials, leaving dz as a regular algebraic frame of ωC and as the analytic differential frame. The cotangent isomorphism in [F5] says z−z(p) has nonzero class in the one-dimensional mp/mp2; since the local ring is a DVR by [F6], it is an algebraic uniformizer. Any rational coefficient is therefore (z−z(p))au with a∈Z and u a regular unit; analytically u is holomorphic with nonzero value at p, so its algebraic and analytic orders are equal. This also proves that a nonzero rational coefficient cannot vanish identically on an analytic neighbourhood. Consequently algebraic rational differentials become nonzero meromorphic differentials with precisely the same divisor, and regular differentials become holomorphic; the restriction of their section spaces is injective. Pullbacks and line-bundle isomorphisms have the same local regular transition formulas and therefore induce the corresponding holomorphic bundle maps.

3.1F6F7F8F9F10step 1.1step 2.1algebra

On each component Xj, the map ϕ is nonconstant: if locally constant at a point over t, a local coordinate of the target vanishing at t would pull back to an identically zero germ, contrary to the finite DVR order of that nonzero rational pullback in step 2.1 and [F7]. Compactness makes each restriction proper. By [F10], it has a positive integer analytic degree dj. Equality of local orders in step 2.1 and the algebraic fibre formula [F7] give ∑jdj=2. If X had two components, both degrees would be one. The fibre formula would then make each restriction bijective and unramified, and the local inverses in [F10] would make each component biholomorphic to the sphere. The sphere has no nonzero holomorphic differential: the meromorphic differential dz has divisor −2[∞], since dz=−w−2dw in w=1/z. Dividing a holomorphic differential by dz would give an element of L(−2[∞]), which is zero by [F9]. But [F8] supplies a nonzero regular algebraic differential, whose restriction is nonzero by step 2.1 and holomorphic on every component; if every component were a sphere it would vanish everywhere, contradicting this injectivity. Thus X is connected and ϕ:X→C^ has degree two.

4.1F7F8F9step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Choose a nonzero regular algebraic differential by [F8], and let KC be its divisor. Step 2.1 identifies its algebraic divisor with the analytic canonical divisor K on connected X, coefficient by coefficient. All residue degrees are one by [F7], so their degrees agree. If h is the topological genus of X, [F8] and [F9] give 2g−2=deg⁡KC=deg⁡K=2h−2, hence h=g. Restriction of regular algebraic differentials is injective by step 2.1; its source has dimension g by [F8] and its target has dimension h=g by [F9], so it is an isomorphism. This proves the required canonical-section and genus comparison without assuming a general algebraic/analytic cohomology comparison.

5.1F2F8F9F10step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

A general fibre of the analytic degree-two map consists of two distinct points P,Q: [F10] makes the branch-value set finite. It is the same algebraic fibre by step 2.1. The pullback of the standard section of O(1) vanishing at t has divisor P+Q on X, so L induces OX(P+Q). The bundle isomorphism in [F2] and step 2.1 therefore give K∼D=(g−1)(P+Q). By [F9], ℓ(K)=g and linear equivalence gives ℓ(D)=g; equivalently RR gives ℓ(D)−ℓ(K−D)=g−1 with K−D∼0 and ℓ(0)=1. The g pulled-back monomial sections in [F2] are now a basis of both algebraic and analytic canonical spaces by step 4.1, so their coordinate map is precisely the Veronese factorization, up to a projective basis change. Since P≠Q have the same image under ϕ, their canonical images agree; hence the canonical map is not an embedding and has degree two onto the rational normal curve. Finally [F8], [F9] and step 4.1 give all displayed RR and duality dimensions.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

221 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources