Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact-solution correction errors vanish in the Gaussian-beam ray limit

Example

Let (M,g) be a compact Riemannian manifold, let T>0, and let Q=(0,T)×M carry product measure dVgdt. Fix a unit-speed geodesic segment γ:[0,L]→M and t0 with 0<t0<T−L, and set Γ(s)=(t0+s,γ(s)), 0≤s≤L; ds denotes its arclength parameter. Let a∈C∞([0,T]×M), and for each λ≥1 let uj,λapp∈L2(Q) and Rj,λ∈L2(Q) for j=1,2. Suppose ∥uj,λapp∥L2(Q)≤C0, ∥Rj,λ∥L2(Q)≤C1λ−1/2, and ∫Qa u1,λappu2,λapp dVgdt⟶∫0La(t0+s,γ(s)) ds. Set uj,λ=uj,λapp+Rj,λ. Then ∣∫Qa u1,λu2,λ dVgdt−∫Qa u1,λappu2,λapp dVgdt∣=O(λ−1/2), and hence the exact-solution product has the same ray-integral limit. For the real self-adjoint wave application, assume additionally Countable Choice, that M is connected and nonempty with nonempty smooth boundary, and that the two operators are Pj=∂t2−Δg+qj(x) with qj∈C∞(M;R) independent of time. The beams must satisfy the following additional supplier conditions: the observed ray has a compact embedded phase-space extension with immersed base projection; its two endpoint cutoff neighborhoods lie outside the measurement cylinder; and the approximate forward beam vanishes near t=0, while the approximate terminal beam vanishes near t=T. These temporal vanishing conditions are separate from the location of the spatial endpoint residuals. Use physical time along the unit-speed spatial ray and the normalization ∣∂tϕ∣=1, with initial transported mass one. Then the Gaussian-beam lemma gives the unweighted ray measure and residual O(λ−N) throughout Q. Apply the wave energy wellposedness theorem with zero boundary data and zero initial data for the forward correction, or zero terminal data for the terminal correction, to the negative residual. Since ∥Pjuj,λapp∥Lt1Lx2≤T∥Pjuj,λapp∥L2(Q), its energy estimate gives an L2(Q) correction O(λ−N), hence the assumed O(λ−1/2) order after choosing N≥1. The exact waves retain the actual approximate boundary traces. This application asserts no temporal vanishing merely from an extension outside the measurement domain; the generic error estimate above only needs its explicitly stated norm and product-limit hypotheses.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth coefficient a on the compact spacetime cylinder; two uniformly L2-bounded approximate solutions; and two L2 correction remainders of order λ−1/2.

[F1]

For real-valued square-integrable v,w, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases gives ∫∣vw∣≤∥v∥2∥w∥2. For complex-valued v,w, apply that inequality to the real functions ∣v∣ and ∣w∣; ∣vw∣=∣v∣∣w∣ and their L2 norms are unchanged.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Expand the exact product: u1,λu2,λ−u1,λappu2,λapp=R1,λu2,λapp+u1,λappR2,λ+R1,λR2,λ. Multiplying by a, integrating, and applying [F1] to each term gives an absolute value at most ∥a∥L∞(Q)(∥R1,λ∥2∥u2,λapp∥2+∥u1,λapp∥2∥R2,λ∥2+∥R1,λ∥2∥R2,λ∥2).

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

By the hypotheses, the preceding expression is bounded by ∥a∥∞(2C0C1λ−1/2+C12λ−1), which is O(λ−1/2) for λ≥1. Since this difference tends to zero, the assumed approximate-product limit passes unchanged to the exact product.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources