Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Energy well-posedness for the variable-metric wave equation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let (M,g) be a compact, connected, nonempty smooth Riemannian manifold with nonempty smooth boundary, let T>0, and let q∈C∞(M;R) be independent of time. Let dVg be Riemannian volume, let K∈{R,C} be the scalar field, and set L2(M)=L2(M,dVg;K). For complex scalars, the L2 inner product is (u,v)L2=∫Muv‾ dVg, linear in its first argument; extend g complex-bilinearly and set ∣∇gu∣g2=⟨∇gu,∇gu‾⟩g. A weak coordinate derivative Diw is defined by ∫w ∂iψ=−∫Diw ψ for every smooth compactly supported coordinate test ψ. Let H1(M;K) be the space of L2(M;K) functions whose weak coordinate first derivatives are locally L2 in smooth charts and whose weak differential has finite metric L2 norm; write ∇gu for the metric dual of that weak differential. Give it norm ∥w∥H1(M;K)2=∫M(∣w∣2+∣∇gw∣g2) dVg, and let H01(M;K) be the closure of Cc∞(M∘) in this norm. For u0∈H01(M;K), u1∈L2(M;K), and F∈L1((0,T);L2(M;K)), there is a unique energy solution of the homogeneous Dirichlet problem utt−Δgu+q(x)u=F,u∣(0,T)×∂M=0,(u(0),ut(0))=(u0,u1), where energy solution means u∈C([0,T];H01(M;K))∩C1([0,T];L2(M;K)), and, for every ϕ∈H01(M;K) and every real-valued ζ∈Cc∞(0,T), the weak equation is ∫0T(u(t),ϕ)L2ζ′′(t) dt+∫0T ⁣∫M(⟨∇gu(t),∇gϕ‾⟩g+q u(t)ϕ‾)ζ(t) dVgdt=∫0T(F(t),ϕ)L2ζ(t) dt. There is a constant C=C(M,g,q,T)<∞ such that sup⁡0≤t≤T(∥u(t)∥H1(M;K)+∥ut(t)∥L2(M;K))≤C(∥u0∥H1(M;K)+∥u1∥L2(M;K)+∥F∥L1((0,T);L2(M;K))). In particular, the solution w with zero initial data satisfies the correction estimate sup⁡0≤t≤T(∥w(t)∥H1(M;K)+∥wt(t)∥L2(M;K))≤C∥F∥L1((0,T);L2(M;K)). The corresponding assertion for prescribed terminal data follows by time reversal. For smooth Dirichlet data compactly supported away from the time endpoints, the boundary lifting in the Riemannian Green-and-lifting lemma reduces the problem to this homogeneous-boundary assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the manifold, metric, static potential, initial data, and Bochner-integrable forcing in the statement.

[F1]

Compact-manifold Dirichlet spectrum and boundary regularity supplies the shifted form b, its equivalent H01 norm, the L2 eigenbasis (ej) with eigenvalues μj>0, and convergence of its projections both in L2 and in the form norm.

[F2]

Riemannian Green identity, boundary trace, and wave lifting supplies a smooth lift of smooth time-compact boundary data, zero near both temporal endpoints.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

Set c=1+∥q∥∞, a(u,v)=b(u,v)−c(u,v)L2, and let PJ be projection on e1,…,eJ. Solve the scalar equations dj′′+(μj−c)dj=(F,ej) with the projected initial data, and put uJ=∑j≤Jdjej. The scalar solutions exist for L1 forcing by integration against the sine/hyperbolic-sine fundamental solution (at zero frequency use t); they have continuous first derivatives and absolutely continuous first derivatives on compact intervals. For EJ=(∥uJ′∥22+b(uJ,uJ))/2, multiply each equation by dˉj′ and take real parts to obtain EJ′=Re⁡(PJF+cuJ,uJ′)≤CEJ+2EJ∥F∥2. Apply this to EJ+η and let η↓0 after integrating: multiplication by e−Ct gives EJ(t)≤CT(EJ(0)+∫0T∥F∥2dt). This is exactly the asserted estimate, uniformly in J.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra

For J>K, the same estimate for uJ−uK has data (PJ−PK)u0,(PJ−PK)u1 and forcing (PJ−PK)F. These data tend to zero in V×H by [F1]. The forcing tends to zero in Lt1H because the projections converge pointwise in H and are contractive, so dominated convergence applies. Hence uJ is Cauchy in C([0,T];V) and uJ′ in C([0,T];H). Their limits u,w satisfy u(t)−u(s)=∫stw(r)dr, so u∈C1([0,T];H) with derivative w and the exact strong initial traces. Pass to the limit in the integrated finite-dimensional equation first for a finite spectral test and then for every ϕ∈V, using boundedness of a and the form-density in [F1]. This gives precisely the displayed weak equation and energy bound. No weak-in-time limiting trace is substituted for a strong trace.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

If two energy solutions have the same data and forcing, test their difference against ej. The scalar coefficient is a distributional solution of dj′′+(μj−c)dj=0 with zero strong data. Its integral equation, or the scalar fundamental solution, gives dj=0. Completeness in [F1] makes the difference zero for every time. The estimate of step 1.1 passes to the strong limit, including its zero-data version. Replacing t by T−t proves terminal well-posedness with the same bound.

4.1F1F2step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra∎

We also establish the classical regularity needed by the last assertion and the DN interfaces. Let h be smooth and zero near the temporal endpoints, take the smooth lift H from [F2], and solve for w=u−H with zero Dirichlet and initial data and forcing G=−LqH. This G is smooth and zero near t=0. For every integer ℓ≥0, solve the same zero-data energy problem with forcing ∂tℓG. Integration in time and uniqueness in step 3.1 identify these solutions successively with ∂tℓw: for example integrating the solution with forcing Gt gives a solution with forcing G−G(0)=G and zero data. Thus all time derivatives of w are continuous in V. At every time, Aw=G−wtt; the right side is continuous in L2, so [F1]'s elliptic estimate gives continuity of w in H2, by applying the estimate to time differences. Apply this argument to every time derivative. Inductively if all time derivatives are continuous in Hk, the identity A∂tℓw=∂tℓG−∂tℓ+2w and [F1] give continuity in Hk+2. Thus all mixed derivatives have arbitrarily high spatial Sobolev regularity, and [F1]'s embedding gives a smooth representative on the closed cylinder, in particular C2. Adding H proves the stated smooth boundary reduction and actual classical forward solvability; time reversal gives the terminal version.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources