Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A visible Euclidean Radon conormal satisfies Bolker

Example

Let X=R2, G=S1×R, and

Z={(θ,s,x):s=x⋅θ}.

Write x=sθ+tθ⊥ on Z, use the analytic total density ∣dθ ds dt∣ and constant weight 1, so R is the full Euclidean Radon transform. This is a properly supported analytic double fibration. Its canonical relation satisfies the global Bolker condition. Using the Euclidean metric to identify covectors with vectors and its associated norm, for every x∈R2 and every ξ∈Tx∗R2∖0, set

θ=ξ/∣ξ∣,τ=∣ξ∣,s=x⋅θ,ηs=τ,ηθ=−τ x⋅θ⊥.

Then (θ,s;ηθ,ηs;x,ξ) is a canonical pair. Thus every nonzero Euclidean covector is visible. In particular, for a compactly supported distribution f, the analytic wavefront recovery theorem implies that if (x,ξ)∈WF⁡A(f), then this data covector belongs to WF⁡A(Rf).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The full Euclidean Radon incidence, its constant analytic weight and line density, and a nonzero covector (x,ξ).

[F1]

The Euclidean Radon transform on R²: lines are parameterized by s=x⋅θ, with θ⊥=(−θ2,θ1).

[F2]

Incidence-coordinate conormal kernel and canonical relation: the defining function F(θ,s,x)=s−x⋅θ gives conormal components by differentiating F, with the relation sign (η,−ξ).

[F3]

Bolker condition for a double-fibration transform: the Bolker condition requires a singleton left fiber and injective differential at its point.

[F4]

Analytic wavefront recovery under Bolker: data-side analytic regularity at a Bolker pair implies object-side analytic regularity.

[F5]

Analytic double-fibration transform and canonical relation: both incidence projections must be analytic submersions and the support condition is properness over compact object supports.

[F6]

Real analytic inverse and implicit functions: a regular zero of a real-analytic scalar function is locally an analytic hypersurface.

Proof

Given: The incidence and the covector (x,ξ).

1.1F1F6givenalgebra

The defining function F(θ,s,x)=s−x⋅θ is analytic and has ∂sF=1. Thus [F6] makes Z=F−1(0) an analytic hypersurface of dimension 3.

1.2F1F2algebra

In a local angle coordinate α with ∂αθ=θ⊥, the defining function has differential dF=ds−(x⋅θ⊥)dα−θ⋅dx. By [F2], the canonical relation consists of ξ=τθ,ηs=τ,ηθ=−τx⋅θ⊥,τ≠0. These signs follow by matching (η,−ξ)=τdF.

2.1F5step 1.1algebrachoose

A tangent vector satisfies s˙−x˙⋅θ−x⋅θ˙=0. Given any data tangent pair (θ˙,s˙), choose x˙=(s˙−x⋅θ˙)θ; this lifts it to TZ, so πG is a submersion. Given any object tangent vector x˙, take θ˙=0 and s˙=x˙⋅θ, so πX is a submersion. Since πX−1(K) is parameterized by the compact set S1×K for every compact K⊂R2, the restriction to G is proper. The specified analytic total density is nowhere zero. The dimensions satisfy 4>3>2≥2, so [F5] applies.

2.2F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For fixed (θ,s,ηs,ηθ) in the image, τ=ηs≠0 and x=sθ−ηθτθ⊥,ξ=τθ. Thus the left fiber is a singleton. To check the differential, let a tangent variation be in the kernel of the left projection. Then θ˙=0, s˙=0, τ˙=η˙s=0, and 0=s˙=x˙⋅θ,0=η˙θ=−τ x˙⋅θ⊥. Since τ≠0 and (θ,θ⊥) is a basis, x˙=0 and ξ˙=0. Hence the left projection is an injective immersion, so [F3] gives global Bolker.

2.3F2step 1.2given

For the specified object covector, θ=ξ/∣ξ∣ and τ=∣ξ∣ satisfy ξ=τθ. With s and η chosen in the statement, step 1.2 supplies the remaining relation equations. Therefore the data-side canonical pair exists for every nonzero ξ.

3.1F4step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3contrapositive∎

The contrapositive of [F4] shows that (x,ξ)∈WF⁡A(f) forces (θ,s;ηθ,ηs)∈WF⁡A(Rf). Its hypotheses hold by the analytic nonvanishing density, properness and full Bolker calculations in steps 1.1–2.2.

Geometric diagram

The line has normal θ, so its conormal covectors are scalar multiples of θ. The point x determines the offset s=x⋅θ; the tangential component of the data covector records −x⋅θ⊥. The drawing fixes these conventions only; the proof computes the full data covector and verifies Bolker directly.

µ?µx¢µ=sx»=¿µµ»visible

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources