Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bias, variance, and signal-to-noise regimes of the isotropic risk curve

Example

For fixed signal norm r≥0, noise standard deviation σ≥0, and aspect ratio γ>0, γ≠1, the limiting risk has bias and variance components biasvariance0<γ<10σ2γ1−γγ>1r2(1−1γ)σ2γ−1. When σ>0, the underparameterized branch increases from limit 0 as γ↓0 to +∞ as γ↑1. On the overparameterized side its variance decreases to 0, and its bias increases to r2. When σ>0, the total overparameterized risk is strictly decreasing if r≤σ, and if r>σ it has a unique minimum at γ∗=r/(r−σ). If σ=0, the underparameterized risk is 0; the overparameterized risk is r2(1−1/γ) and is strictly increasing when r>0. The one-sided risk curves diverge at γ=1 only when σ>0; no risk limit at γ=1 is asserted. For σ>0 the global infimum over γ≠1 is 0, approached as γ↓0 and not attained; if r=0, it is also approached as γ→∞. For σ=0, the minimum 0 is attained throughout 0<γ<1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: r≥0, σ≥0, and γ>0 with γ≠1.

[F1]

The limiting bias and variance components are the two displayed branches (Separate isotropic ridgeless risk into limiting bias and variance).

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Summing the two components in [F1] gives the total risk R(γ)=σ2γ/(1−γ) for 0<γ<1 and R(γ)=r2(1−1/γ)+σ2/(γ−1) for γ>1. Differentiating the first expression gives R′(γ)=σ2/(1−γ)2, so it is strictly increasing for σ>0 and is identically zero for σ=0.

1.2givenF1algebra

For γ>1, R′(γ)=r2γ2−σ2(γ−1)2. If σ>0 and r≤σ, then r/γ≤σ/γ<σ/(γ−1), so R′<0. If r>σ>0, the derivative vanishes exactly when r(γ−1)=σγ, namely at γ∗=r/(r−σ)>1; it is negative before this point and positive after it, giving the unique minimum. If σ=0, the derivative is r2/γ2, which is positive for r>0 and zero for r=0.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

The limits at γ↓0, γ↑1, and γ→∞ follow directly from the formulas in [F1]. In particular, the singular terms at γ=1 vanish when σ=0 and diverge when σ>0. For σ>0 every finite-domain risk value is positive while the underparameterized branch tends to zero as γ↓0, proving that its global infimum is 0 and is not attained. When σ=0, the underparameterized branch equals 0 identically.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources