How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bias, variance, and signal-to-noise regimes of the isotropic risk curve
Example
For fixed signal norm , noise standard deviation , and aspect ratio , , the limiting risk has bias and variance components When , the underparameterized branch increases from limit as to as . On the overparameterized side its variance decreases to , and its bias increases to . When , the total overparameterized risk is strictly decreasing if , and if it has a unique minimum at . If , the underparameterized risk is ; the overparameterized risk is and is strictly increasing when . The one-sided risk curves diverge at only when ; no risk limit at is asserted. For the global infimum over is , approached as and not attained; if , it is also approached as . For , the minimum is attained throughout .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and with .
The limiting bias and variance components are the two displayed branches (Separate isotropic ridgeless risk into limiting bias and variance).
Verification
Summing the two components in [F1] gives the total risk for and for . Differentiating the first expression gives , so it is strictly increasing for and is identically zero for .
For , If and , then , so . If , the derivative vanishes exactly when , namely at ; it is negative before this point and positive after it, giving the unique minimum. If , the derivative is , which is positive for and zero for .
The limits at , , and follow directly from the formulas in [F1]. In particular, the singular terms at vanish when and diverge when . For every finite-domain risk value is positive while the underparameterized branch tends to zero as , proving that its global infimum is and is not attained. When , the underparameterized branch equals identically.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hastie, Montanari, Rosset, and Tibshirani, Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolation (standard reference, not scraped)