How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A likelihood tilt can be a finite measure of mass below one
Example
On with counting measure, let , , and model densities , , , . Give and prior probability each. The density is the unique KL minimizer, while the likelihood tilt at has total mass .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite model, prior, and IID law in the Example.
KL projection sets and relative KL neighborhoods: the projection minimizes the directional contrast .
Assume AC through the imported KL convention. No further choice is used in this finite model. The Axiom of Choice
Likelihood-tilted measures at a KL projection: the total likelihood-tilt mass is and is not required to equal one.
Likelihood tilts are sigma-finite measures: the tilted set function is a measure; a finite total mass is allowed to be below one.
Verification
The KL loss at is At , is not absolutely continuous with respect to , so . Thus is the unique minimizer and every KL neighborhood has prior mass at least .
The likelihood tilt at assigns mass Hence , so is a finite nonprobability measure.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. J. K. Kleijn and A. W. van der Vaart, The Bernstein-Von-Mises Theorem under Misspecification, §3.2, pp. 368–370 (standard reference, not scraped)