How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Likelihood-tilted measures at a KL projection
Definition
Fix a selected as in KL projection sets and relative KL neighborhoods. Since its KL value is finite, -almost surely. For each , define the nonnegative set function where the ratio is assigned value on the -null set . Write When , is not a probability law. The local sigma-finiteness lemma proves that it is a measure. The local product-measure lemma then constructs and proves its density relative to is .
For a measurable test , once that product measure has been constructed, means the nonnegative integral of under it. It may be infinite; a hypothesis that this quantity tends to zero in particular requires it to be finite for all sufficiently large .
Depends on
Used by
- Weak tests against likelihood tilts do not ensure almost-sure posterior consistency Counterexample
- A finite misspecified model with a unique KL projection Example
- A likelihood tilt can be a finite measure of mass above one Example
- A likelihood tilt can be a finite measure of mass below one Example
- Exponential tests and KL mass force posterior exclusion Lemma
- KL-neighborhood prior mass lower-bounds the likelihood denominator Lemma
- Likelihood tilts are sigma-finite measures Lemma
- Product likelihood tilts have the product density Lemma
- Compact models admit tests at a unique KL projection under fractional-moment continuity Proposition
- Posterior consistency at a KL projection Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. J. K. Kleijn and A. W. van der Vaart, The Bernstein-Von-Mises Theorem under Misspecification, §3.2, p. 370, and §4.1, pp. 376–379 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. J. K. Kleijn, Bayesian Statistics for Frequentists, §5.3.1, pp. 158–160 (standard reference, not scraped)