Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A fixed-mesh P1 volumetric-locking obstruction

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. On D=(0,1)2, let c=(1/2,1/2) and split the square into the four triangles joining c to consecutive corners. The continuous P1 vector space with zero boundary values has no nonzero elementwise divergence-free field. Choose a nonzero smooth compactly supported divergence-free displacement u and set f=−div⁡(2ε(u)). Then u solves the continuous model with μ=1 for every finite λ≥0, but the P1 displacement Galerkin solutions on this fixed mesh tend to zero as λ→∞, so their V-norm error tends to ∥u∥V>0. The mini mixed pair on the same mesh retains the λ-uniform best-approximation estimate of Uniform mini-element stability through the incompressible limit. This is a fixed-mesh obstruction, not a mesh-uniform P1 rate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the displacement model, its energy theorem, the mini mixed formulation and stability theorem; and the four-triangle fan mesh specified in the statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited through the continuous Hilbert-space solution theorem; the finite-mesh calculation and compactness argument use finite-dimensional subsequence extraction. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

For μ=1 and finite λ, the displacement solution is unique, has the stated energy identity, and satisfies a uniform H01 bound. (Dirichlet elasticity energy bound and Galerkin estimate)

[F2]

The mixed mini-element problem has a λ-uniform solution and best-approximation bound on a common shape-regular mesh family. (Uniform mini-element stability through the incompressible limit)

[F3]

The P1-bubble/P1 mini-element uses continuous P1 vector functions with zero trace plus cell bubbles, and mean-zero continuous P1 pressures. (The conforming P1-bubble/P1 mini element)

[F4]

The integral pairing obeys ∣(g,h)L2∣≤∥g∥2∥h∥2. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

[F5]

H01(D) is the H1-closure of Cc∞(D). (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure)

[F6]

For zero-boundary fields, 2∥ε(v)∥22≥∥∇v∥22. (The homogeneous Dirichlet strain identity)

Verification

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Set η(t)=exp⁡(−1/((t−1/4)(3/4−t))) for 1/4<t<3/4 and η(t)=0 otherwise. At each endpoint every derivative from the interior is a finite sum of reciprocal-distance powers multiplied by exp⁡(−c/distance) for some c>0, hence tends to zero; so η∈Cc∞(0,1). Put ψ(x,y)=η(x)η(y) and u=(∂yψ,−∂xψ). Equality of mixed derivatives gives div⁡u=0. Since η(1/2)>0 and η(1/4)=0, the mean value theorem gives y∈(1/4,1/2) with η′(y)>0; hence u1(1/2,y)=η(1/2)η′(y)>0. Thus u≠0 and is compactly supported in D.

1.2A1F4F5givenalgebra

Let f=−div⁡(2ε(u))∈Cc∞(D;R2). For v∈Cc∞(D;R2), integration by parts and symmetry of 2ε(u) give 2(ε(u),ε(v))=(f,v). By [A1, F5], choose such tests converging to any given v∈V in H1; [F4] makes both pairings continuous under this convergence, so the identity holds for every v∈V.

1.3givenalgebra

A P1 vector field in this mesh vanishes at every boundary vertex and is determined by its center value z=(a,b). On the bottom triangle the edge vectors from the center to its corners are (−1/2,−1/2) and (1/2,−1/2); its affine gradient G maps both to −z. Subtracting gives the first column of G zero, and adding gives the second column (2a,2b), so divergence is 2b. On the right triangle the edge vectors are (1/2,−1/2) and (1/2,1/2); subtraction gives the second column zero and addition the first column (−2a,−2b), hence divergence is −2a. On the top triangle the edge vectors are (1/2,1/2) and (−1/2,1/2); subtraction gives the first column zero and addition the second column (−2a,−2b), hence divergence is −2b. On the left triangle the edge vectors are (−1/2,1/2) and (−1/2,−1/2); subtraction gives the second column zero and addition the first column (2a,2b), hence divergence is 2a. If all four divergences vanish, then a=b=0, so the elementwise divergence-free subspace is exactly {0}.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra

Since div⁡u=0, the volumetric term vanishes and step 1.2 gives Eλ(u,v)=f(v) for every v∈V and every finite λ≥0. By [F1], this identifies the same nonzero u as the unique continuous solution for each such λ.

3.1F1F4F6step 1.3step 2.1algebra

Let uh,λ be the P1 Galerkin solution, which exists uniquely by [F1]. Testing with uh,λ, using [F6] with μ=1, and applying [F4] gives ∥uh,λ∥V≤∥f∥V′ and λ∥div⁡uh,λ∥22≤∥f∥V′2. Thus along every sequence λn→∞ the discrete solutions are bounded in the finite-dimensional P1 space and have a convergent subsequence; the divergence of its limit is zero because the divergence norms tend to zero and convergence in H1 implies convergence of divergence in L2. The limit is zero by step 1.3. If the full family did not converge to zero, a sequence bounded away from zero would have such a zero-convergent subsequence, a contradiction. Hence uh,λ→0 and the reverse triangle inequality gives ∥u−uh,λ∥V→∥u∥V>0.

4.1F2F3step 3.1∎

The mini mixed comparison is exactly the scoped result [F2] under the spaces [F3]; its estimate keeps the best-approximation term and its constant is independent of λ on this mesh family. No conclusion about a P1 rate as h→0 is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources