Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dirichlet elasticity energy bound and Galerkin estimate

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the data of Linear isotropic elasticity: displacement form and data. For every finite λ≥0 there is a unique u∈V such that Eλ(u,v)=f(v) for every v∈V. It satisfies

∥u∥V≤μ0−1∥f∥V′,Eλ(u,u)≤μ0−1/2∥f∥V′.

For every finite-dimensional conforming subspace Vh⊂V, the Galerkin solution uh is unique and

∥u−uh∥V≤2μ1+dλμ0inf⁡vh∈Vh∥u−vh∥V.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, d∈{2,3}, the model data, a finite λ≥0, and f∈V′.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used for Hilbert completeness and the continuous Lax–Milgram and Céa applications. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

V=H01(D;Rd) has the gradient norm, and the local homogeneous-Dirichlet Poincaré inequality makes that norm equivalent to the usual H1 norm. (Linear isotropic elasticity: displacement form and data, A bounded-domain Poincare inequality for H1-zero fields)

[F2]

Under Countable Choice, W1,2(D) is Hilbert; H01(D) is its closed subspace defined as the H1-closure of Cc∞(D). (The Sobolev space H1 is a Hilbert space, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F3]

For every v∈V, 2∥ε(v)∥22=∥∇v∥22+∥div⁡v∥22. (The homogeneous Dirichlet strain identity)

[F4]

Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the L2 pairing and the induced integral bilinear forms. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

[F5]

A bounded coercive real bilinear form on a Hilbert space has a unique variational solution. (The Lax--Milgram theorem)

[F6]

For a bounded coercive conforming Galerkin problem, ∥u−uh∥≤(M/α)inf⁡vh∥u−vh∥. (Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems)

Proof

1.1givenF1F4algebra

Since ∣ε(v)∣F≤∣∇v∣F and ∣div⁡v∣≤d∣∇v∣F, [F4] gives ∣Eλ(u,v)∣≤(2μ1+dλ)∥u∥V∥v∥V. The form is real, symmetric, and bounded.

1.2givenF3algebra

By [F3] and μ≥μ0, Eλ(v,v)≥2μ0∥ε(v)∥22≥μ0∥v∥V2; the volumetric term is nonnegative.

2.1A1F1F2F5step 1.1step 1.2

By [F1]–[F2], V is complete in ∥⋅∥V. Applying [F5] to the bounded functional f and the form of steps 1.1–1.2 yields a unique u∈V.

3.1givenstep 1.2step 2.1algebra

Testing with v=u gives Eλ(u,u)=f(u)≤∥f∥V′∥u∥V and, by step 1.2, μ0∥u∥V2≤∥f∥V′∥u∥V. If u≠0, divide by μ0∥u∥V; if u=0, the claimed bound is immediate. Substitution into the energy identity gives the second estimate.

4.1A1F1F2F6step 1.1step 1.2∎

The form bounds in step 1.1 and the coercivity constant μ0 in step 1.2 satisfy the hypotheses of [F6] on every finite-dimensional conforming Vh. Thus its Galerkin solution is unique and the stated M/α estimate is exactly M=2μ1+dλ, α=μ0.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Linear isotropic elasticity: displacement form and data.

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources