Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A bounded-domain Poincare inequality for H1-zero fields

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let D⊂Rd be bounded and open, and suppose its first coordinate projection is contained in an interval (a,b) of width L=b−a. For every real v∈H01(D), ∥v∥L2(D)≤L∥∂1v∥L2(D)≤L∥∇v∥L2(D).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded open D⊂(a,b)×Rd−1 and v∈H01(D), where H01 is the H1-closure of Cc∞(D).

[A1]

Countable Choice permits selecting the approximating test functions from the H0 closure at each n. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

H01(D) is the closure of compactly supported smooth functions in the W1,2 norm. (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure)

[F2]

The W1,2 norm includes the L2 norm and the L2 norms of all first weak derivatives. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F3]

Fubini permits iterated integration of the nonnegative integrand on the bounded coordinate slab. (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product)

[F4]

The L2 Cauchy--Schwarz inequality gives ∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

Proof

1.1givenF1F4

First take v∈Cc∞(D) and extend it by zero to (a,b)×Rd−1. For every x′∈Rd−1 and x1∈(a,b), the fundamental theorem of calculus gives v(x1,x′)=∫ax1∂1v(t,x′) dt. Cauchy--Schwarz yields ∣v(x1,x′)∣2≤L∫ab∣∂1v(t,x′)∣2dt.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Integrating the last inequality over x1 gives a second factor L; integrating over x′ and using the zero extension proves ∥v∥22≤L2∥∂1v∥22.

3.1A1F1F2F3algebrastep 2.1∎

For general v∈H01(D), [A1, F1] supplies a sequence vn∈Cc∞(D) converging to v in W1,2. The two norms in step 2.1 converge by [F2], so passing to the limit gives the same inequality for v. Finally ∣∂1v∣≤∣∇v∣ almost everywhere.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources