Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded Bogovskii right inverse on a star-shaped domain

Statement

Let U⊂Rd be bounded and open, star-shaped with respect to a ball, and let ω and BU be as in The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set. Under Countable Choice there is a bounded linear extension BU:L02(U)→H01(U;Rd) such that div⁡BUf=f,∥∇BUf∥2≤CU∥f∥2. After translating the ball center to 0, choose RU≥sup⁡y∈U∣y∣ and define Aj(ϕ)=2(d−1)/2(ρ−1∥ϕ∥1+ρ∥∂j2ϕ∥1)+2d∣U∣∥∂jϕ∥∞. One valid constant is CU=(∑k,j=1d[Aj(xkω)+RUAj(ω)]2)1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; bounded star-shaped U, unit-integral ω∈Cc∞ supported in the ball of radius ρ, and the Bogovskii formula.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used to select the L2 approximation sequence and take its H1 limit. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The formula has compact support in U for compactly supported smooth input and satisfies div⁡BUf=f−ω∫Uf distributionally. (Support, integrability, and divergence identity for the Bogovskii kernel)

[F2]

Each derivative of the formula is the difference Txkω,jf−Tω,j(ykf) in the distributional sense. (Truncated Fourier formula for derivatives of the Bogovskii operator)

[F3]

For the restriction to U, the Fourier ray estimate and bounded-kernel tail give ∥Tϕ,jg∥L2(U)≤Aj(ϕ)∥g∥L2(U) when g∈Cc∞(U). (Elementary Fourier ray and derivative L2 bounds)

[F4]

On bounded U, zero-boundary functions satisfy ∥w∥2≤CP(U)∥∇w∥2. (A bounded-domain Poincare inequality for H1-zero fields)

[F5]
[F6]

Every open ball contains a nonnegative smooth compactly supported function with strictly positive integral; normalizing its integral gives a unit-mass bump. (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)

[F7]

Scaling a unit-mass smooth bump gives a mollifier family with unit mass and support radius ϵ. (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump)

[F8]

Convolution of a locally integrable function with a smooth compactly supported mollifier is smooth, and its support is contained in the closure of the support sum. (Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign, The support of a convolution lies in the closure of the support sumset)

[F9]

Mollification commutes with weak derivatives and an L2 approximate identity converges to the identity in L2, under Countable Choice. (Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives, Every L1 approximate identity converges to the identity in Lp for 1≤p<∞, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F10]

The L2 Cauchy--Schwarz inequality gives ∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

Proof

1.1A1F2F3givenalgebra

First take f∈Cc∞(U) with ∫f=0. After translating the ball center to 0, both ω and xkω are supported in B(0,ρ)⊂U. For either ϕ=ω or ϕ=xkω and any g∈Cc∞(U), every point in the support of a truncated Tϕ,jg has the form x=(1−t)y+tz with y∈supp⁡g, z∈supp⁡ϕ, and 0≤t≤1. Star-shapedness puts every such segment in U; compactness of supp⁡g×supp⁡ϕ×[0,1] shows the resulting support is contained in a compact subset of U. Hence the distributional operators in [F2] are supported in U and their ambient L2 norms equal their L2(U) norms. By [F2]–[F3], for each k,j, ∥∂j(BUf)k∥2≤[Aj(xkω)+RUAj(ω)]∥f∥2, since ∣yk∣≤RU on U. Squaring and summing the finitely many derivative components gives ∥∇BUf∥2≤CU∥f∥2.

2.1A1F1F6F7F8F9choosestep 1.1

By [F1], this field is supported in a compact subset K⋐U, and step 1.1 puts it in H1(Rd). Choose the normalized bump from [F6] and its scaled mollifier ρϵ from [F7]. For ϵ<12dist⁡(K,Rd∖U), [F8] makes ρϵ∗BUf smooth with compact support in U. Its first derivatives are ρϵ∗∂j(BUf) and converge in L2 together with the field by [F9], so the approximants converge to BUf in H1. Hence BUf∈H01(U). The divergence identity in [F1] reduces to div⁡BUf=f.

2.2A1F5givenF10step 1.1

For arbitrary f∈L02(U), choose hn∈Cc∞(U) with hn→f in L2 using [F5], and put fn=hn−ω∫Uhn. Then fn∈Cc∞(U), ∫fn=0, and ∥fn−f∥2≤(1+∣U∣1/2∥ω∥2)∥hn−f∥2→0 by Cauchy–Schwarz and ∫f=0.

3.1A1F4F5algebrastep 1.1step 2.1∎

By step 1.1 applied to differences, BUfn is Cauchy in the gradient norm. [F4] makes it Cauchy in H1; completeness and closedness in [F5] give a limit in H01(U). The limit is independent of the approximating sequence by the same bound, so it defines a linear operator and retains the gradient bound. Continuity of divergence H1→L2 and step 2.1 give div⁡BUf=f.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources