How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded Bogovskii right inverse on a star-shaped domain
Statement
Let be bounded and open, star-shaped with respect to a ball, and let and be as in The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set. Under Countable Choice there is a bounded linear extension such that After translating the ball center to , choose and define One valid constant is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; bounded star-shaped , unit-integral supported in the ball of radius , and the Bogovskii formula.
Countable Choice is used to select the L2 approximation sequence and take its H1 limit. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The formula has compact support in for compactly supported smooth input and satisfies distributionally. (Support, integrability, and divergence identity for the Bogovskii kernel)
Each derivative of the formula is the difference in the distributional sense. (Truncated Fourier formula for derivatives of the Bogovskii operator)
For the restriction to , the Fourier ray estimate and bounded-kernel tail give when . (Elementary Fourier ray and derivative L2 bounds)
On bounded , zero-boundary functions satisfy . (A bounded-domain Poincare inequality for H1-zero fields)
Under Countable Choice, is dense in , is Hilbert, and is closed. (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in , The Sobolev space is a Hilbert space, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Every open ball contains a nonnegative smooth compactly supported function with strictly positive integral; normalizing its integral gives a unit-mass bump. (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)
Scaling a unit-mass smooth bump gives a mollifier family with unit mass and support radius . (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump)
Convolution of a locally integrable function with a smooth compactly supported mollifier is smooth, and its support is contained in the closure of the support sum. (Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign, The support of a convolution lies in the closure of the support sumset)
Mollification commutes with weak derivatives and an approximate identity converges to the identity in , under Countable Choice. (Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives, Every approximate identity converges to the identity in for , The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The L2 Cauchy--Schwarz inequality gives . (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for )
Proof
First take with . After translating the ball center to , both and are supported in . For either or and any , every point in the support of a truncated has the form with , , and . Star-shapedness puts every such segment in ; compactness of shows the resulting support is contained in a compact subset of . Hence the distributional operators in [F2] are supported in and their ambient norms equal their norms. By [F2]–[F3], for each , , since on . Squaring and summing the finitely many derivative components gives .
By [F1], this field is supported in a compact subset , and step 1.1 puts it in . Choose the normalized bump from [F6] and its scaled mollifier from [F7]. For , [F8] makes smooth with compact support in . Its first derivatives are and converge in together with the field by [F9], so the approximants converge to in . Hence . The divergence identity in [F1] reduces to .
For arbitrary , choose with in using [F5], and put . Then , , and by Cauchy–Schwarz and .
By step 1.1 applied to differences, is Cauchy in the gradient norm. [F4] makes it Cauchy in ; completeness and closedness in [F5] give a limit in . The limit is independent of the approximating sequence by the same bound, so it defines a linear operator and retains the gradient bound. Continuity of divergence and step 2.1 give .
Depends on
- Support, integrability, and divergence identity for the Bogovskii kernel
- Elementary Fourier ray and derivative L2 bounds
- A bounded-domain Poincare inequality for H1-zero fields
- Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in $L^2$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Sobolev space $H^1$ is a Hilbert space
- The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set
- Truncated Fourier formula for derivatives of the Bogovskii operator
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2$
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign
- The support of a convolution lies in the closure of the support sumset
- Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives
- Every $L^1$ approximate identity converges to the identity in $L^p$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ricardo G. Durán, An elementary proof of the continuity from L2_0(Omega) to H1_0(Omega)^n of Bogovskii’s right inverse of the divergence (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi, Michel Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications (complete textbook) (standard reference, not scraped)