Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Truncated Fourier formula for derivatives of the Bogovskii operator

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let U and ω be as in The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set. For ϕ∈Cc∞(Rd) and f∈Cc∞(Rd), use g^(ξ)=∫e−2πix⋅ξg(x)dx and define Tϕ,jϵf(x)=∫f(y)∫ϵ1∂xj[ϕ(y+x−yt)]dttddy. As ϵ↓0 these converge in distributions to Tϕ,jf. The part with 0<t<1/2 satisfies Tϕ,j<f^(ξ)=2πiξj∫01/2ϕ^(tξ)f^((1−t)ξ)dt. When f∈Cc∞(U), the Bogovskii formula satisfies ∂j(BUf)k=Txkω,jf−Tω,j(ykf) distributionally.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; bounded star-shaped U, the normalized bump ω of The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set, smooth compactly supported real f,ϕ, and the displayed Fourier convention.

[A1]

Countable Choice is required by the affine Lebesgue change-of-variables supplier used in [F2] and the Fourier/Plancherel suppliers in [F1]. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Plancherel and Fourier transformation agree with the integral transform on smooth integrable functions, and weak differentiation transforms to multiplication by 2πiξj. (Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers)

[F2]

In the Bogovskii formula x−y=t(z−y). For t>0, dilation z↦tz scales Lebesgue measure by td and translation by (1−t)y preserves it, so their composition x=y+t(z−y) has dx=tddz. The integral identity follows for indicators, then by simple-function approximation and positive and negative parts for integrable functions. (The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set, A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation)

[F3]

Fubini applies to the compactly supported truncated integral and its Fourier transform. (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product)

[F4]

The kernel proof bounds its absolute integrand after integration in t by C∣x−y∣1−d for 0<∣x−y∣≤diam⁡(U); this radial bound is integrable uniformly in each variable. The Bogovskii field and all its truncations have support in the compact set of segments joining supp⁡f to supp⁡ω. (Support, integrability, and divergence identity for the Bogovskii kernel)

[F5]

An integrable absolute majorant permits passing an almost-everywhere limit through the integral. (Dominated convergence)

Proof

1.1A1givenF2F3algebra

For 0<δ<ϵ<1/2, pair Tϕ,jδf−Tϕ,jϵf with a Schwartz test function ζ. This difference integrates only over δ≤t≤ϵ, where the change of variables x=y+t(z−y) and Fubini are absolutely justified. The inner pairing contains t−1∂jϕ(z)ζ(y+t(z−y)). Integration by parts in z changes its integral to −∫ϕ(z)∂jζ(y+t(z−y))dz; the factor t−1 has canceled. Its absolute value is at most ∥ϕ∥1∥∇ζ∥∞, uniformly in y,t. Thus the paired difference is bounded by (ϵ−δ)∥f∥1∥ϕ∥1∥∇ζ∥∞, so Tϕ,jϵf has a distributional limit as ϵ↓0.

2.1A1F1F3F2F5step 1.1

For ϵ<t<1/2, Fourier transform in x and use x=y+t(z−y), whose Jacobian is td. The factor t−d cancels the Jacobian and ∂xjϕ(z)=t−1∂zjϕ(z). Integration by parts in z gives ∂jϕ^(tξ)=2πitξjϕ^(tξ) by [F1]; the remaining y integral is f^((1−t)ξ). Hence the truncated transform is 2πiξj∫ϵ1/2ϕ^(tξ)f^((1−t)ξ)dt. The integrals converge pointwise in ξ, and their absolute values are bounded uniformly in ϵ by π∣ξj∣∥ϕ∥1∥f∥1. Against any Schwartz test function this is an integrable majorant, so [F5] gives convergence in S′. Step 1.1 gives convergence in S′ as well, since its bound uses the Schwartz seminorm ∥∇ζ∥∞. Fourier transformation therefore identifies the displayed integral with the same limit.

3.1A1F2F3F4F5step 1.1∎

For ϵ>0, let BUϵf be the defining integral truncated to t≥ϵ. For fixed x≠y, the kernel integrand is zero for all sufficiently small t, because nonzero values require ∣x−y∣/t=∣z−y∣≤R:=diam⁡(U). By [F4], the absolute t integral is bounded by C∣x−y∣1−d10<∣x−y∣≤R. Its product with ∣f(y)∣ is integrable in (x,y) by the annular bound and Fubini. Applying [F5] to this absolute majorant proves convergence of the truncated fields to BUf in L1(Rd) and hence in distributions; no sign condition on ω is required. Rewrite the k-th component using xk−yk=t(zk−yk) from [F2] as the integral of [zkω(z)−ykω(z)]f(y) against dt/td. Differentiating the truncated fields in xj, then using step 1.1 for the distributional limit, gives Txkω,jf−Tω,j(ykf); the minus sign comes from the second term.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources