How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Truncated Fourier formula for derivatives of the Bogovskii operator
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let and be as in The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set. For and , use and define As these converge in distributions to . The part with satisfies When , the Bogovskii formula satisfies distributionally.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; bounded star-shaped , the normalized bump of The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set, smooth compactly supported real , and the displayed Fourier convention.
Countable Choice is required by the affine Lebesgue change-of-variables supplier used in [F2] and the Fourier/Plancherel suppliers in [F1]. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Plancherel and Fourier transformation agree with the integral transform on smooth integrable functions, and weak differentiation transforms to multiplication by . (Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers)
In the Bogovskii formula . For , dilation scales Lebesgue measure by and translation by preserves it, so their composition has . The integral identity follows for indicators, then by simple-function approximation and positive and negative parts for integrable functions. (The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set, A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation)
Fubini applies to the compactly supported truncated integral and its Fourier transform. (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product)
The kernel proof bounds its absolute integrand after integration in by for ; this radial bound is integrable uniformly in each variable. The Bogovskii field and all its truncations have support in the compact set of segments joining to . (Support, integrability, and divergence identity for the Bogovskii kernel)
An integrable absolute majorant permits passing an almost-everywhere limit through the integral. (Dominated convergence)
Proof
For , pair with a Schwartz test function . This difference integrates only over , where the change of variables and Fubini are absolutely justified. The inner pairing contains . Integration by parts in changes its integral to ; the factor has canceled. Its absolute value is at most , uniformly in . Thus the paired difference is bounded by , so has a distributional limit as .
For , Fourier transform in and use , whose Jacobian is . The factor cancels the Jacobian and . Integration by parts in gives by [F1]; the remaining integral is . Hence the truncated transform is . The integrals converge pointwise in , and their absolute values are bounded uniformly in by . Against any Schwartz test function this is an integrable majorant, so [F5] gives convergence in . Step 1.1 gives convergence in as well, since its bound uses the Schwartz seminorm . Fourier transformation therefore identifies the displayed integral with the same limit.
For , let be the defining integral truncated to . For fixed , the kernel integrand is zero for all sufficiently small , because nonzero values require . By [F4], the absolute integral is bounded by . Its product with is integrable in by the annular bound and Fubini. Applying [F5] to this absolute majorant proves convergence of the truncated fields to in and hence in distributions; no sign condition on is required. Rewrite the -th component using from [F2] as the integral of against . Differentiating the truncated fields in , then using step 1.1 for the distributional limit, gives ; the minus sign comes from the second term.
Depends on
- The Bogovskii integral on a star-shaped set
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- A linear map $T$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with $\lambda_n(T[E])=|\det T|\,\lambda_n(E)$ when $T$ is invertible and $T[E]$ Lebesgue null when it is not
- Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
- Dominated convergence
- Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms
- Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Support, integrability, and divergence identity for the Bogovskii kernel
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ricardo G. Durán, An elementary proof of the continuity from L2_0(Omega) to H1_0(Omega)^n of Bogovskii’s right inverse of the divergence (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi, Michel Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications (complete textbook) (standard reference, not scraped)