How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Divergence right inverse on bounded connected Lipschitz domains
Statement
Let be nonempty, bounded, connected and Lipschitz, with . Under Countable Choice there is a bounded linear map such that For a chosen finite cover and tree decomposition from Finite star-shaped cover of a bounded Lipschitz domain and Zero-mean L2 decomposition over a finite cover, one valid bound is ; it is finite and independent of any finite-element mesh.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; a bounded connected Lipschitz domain, the finite star-shaped cover, its zero-mean decomposition constants, and the local Bogovskii right inverses.
Countable Choice is inherited through the local L2 divergence right-inverse extension. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The cover has finitely many star-shaped and every decomposes linearly into with and . (Finite star-shaped cover of a bounded Lipschitz domain, Zero-mean L2 decomposition over a finite cover)
Each local operator maps boundedly into with divergence and gradient bound . (Bounded Bogovskii right inverse on a star-shaped domain)
Zero-boundary fields on bounded open sets have zero-mean divergence. (Zero mean of the divergence of a zero-boundary field)
Proof
For , form by [F1], apply the local theorem [F2], extend each by zero to , and define . The extension belongs to : approximate in by compactly supported smooth fields and extend those by zero.
Zero extension preserves weak derivatives because the approximating functions are compactly supported inside ; hence is the zero extension of . Summing and using [F1] gives . Linearity follows from the linear decomposition and local operators.
The triangle inequality and [F1]–[F2] yield . Each sum is finite, and its ingredients depend only on the chosen domain cover, not on a mesh parameter.
Conversely, any has zero-mean divergence by [F3], so is the compatible pressure range. The identity in step 2.1 proves that every such datum is attained by the constructed right inverse.
Depends on
Used by
- An energy Navier–Stokes velocity on the square without endpoint-integrable pressure Counterexample
- Integrated pressure recovery and MINI pressure-primitive convergence Lemma
- Korn coercivity with a partial Dirichlet segment Lemma
- Mean-zero pressure recovery from a solenoidal residual Lemma
- Continuous mixed Darcy well-posedness with pressure gauge Theorem
- Continuous Stokes divergence inf-sup on a Lipschitz domain Theorem
- Two-dimensional uniqueness and conditional three-dimensional weak–strong uniqueness Theorem
- Uniform RT0/P0 divergence lift and inf-sup bound Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Chapters 53–54 (complete course notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi, Michel Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications (complete textbook) (standard reference, not scraped)