Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divergence right inverse on bounded connected Lipschitz domains

Statement

Let D⊂Rd be nonempty, bounded, connected and Lipschitz, with d∈{2,3}. Under Countable Choice there is a bounded linear map BD:L02(D)→H01(D;Rd) such that div⁡BDq=q,∥∇BDq∥2≤Cdiv(D)∥q∥2. For a chosen finite cover and tree decomposition from Finite star-shaped cover of a bounded Lipschitz domain and Zero-mean L2 decomposition over a finite cover, one valid bound is Cdiv(D)=∑iCUiDi; it is finite and independent of any finite-element mesh.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; a bounded connected Lipschitz domain, the finite star-shaped cover, its zero-mean decomposition constants, and the local Bogovskii right inverses.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited through the local L2 divergence right-inverse extension. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The cover has finitely many star-shaped Ui and every q∈L02(D) decomposes linearly into qi∈L02(Ui) with q=∑iqi and ∥qi∥2≤Di∥q∥2. (Finite star-shaped cover of a bounded Lipschitz domain, Zero-mean L2 decomposition over a finite cover)

[F2]

Each local operator maps L02(Ui) boundedly into H01(Ui)d with divergence qi and gradient bound CUi. (Bounded Bogovskii right inverse on a star-shaped domain)

[F3]

Zero-boundary fields on bounded open sets have zero-mean divergence. (Zero mean of the divergence of a zero-boundary field)

Proof

1.1A1F1F2construct

For q∈L02(D), form qi by [F1], apply the local theorem [F2], extend each BUiqi by zero to D, and define BDq=∑iBUiqi~. The extension belongs to H01(D)d: approximate in H1(Ui) by compactly supported smooth fields and extend those by zero.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1

Zero extension preserves weak derivatives because the approximating functions are compactly supported inside Ui; hence div⁡BUiqi~ is the zero extension of qi. Summing and using [F1] gives div⁡BDq=q. Linearity follows from the linear decomposition and local operators.

2.2A1F1F2algebrastep 1.1

The triangle inequality and [F1]–[F2] yield ∥∇BDq∥2≤∑iCUi∥qi∥2≤(∑iCUiDi)∥q∥2. Each sum is finite, and its ingredients depend only on the chosen domain cover, not on a mesh parameter.

3.1A1F3step 2.1∎

Conversely, any v∈H01(D)d has zero-mean divergence by [F3], so L02(D) is the compatible pressure range. The identity in step 2.1 proves that every such datum is attained by the constructed right inverse.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources